• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿奇霉素与交沙霉素对比:89例急性肺炎的治疗

[Azithromycin versus josamycin: treatment of 89 cases of acute pneumonia].

作者信息

Brion J P, Sedallian A, Le Noc P, Briffod J, Micoud M

机构信息

Association pour la Promotion et la Recherche en Information Médicale, Annecy.

出版信息

Pathol Biol (Paris). 1990 Jun;38(5 ( Pt 2)):521-5.

PMID:2166934
Abstract

In an open, multicenter randomized clinical trial on patients with acute pneumonia, 5-day therapy using a new oral macrolide antibiotic, azithromycin (Az), was compared with standard 10-day therapy using another macrolide, josamycin (J). Eighty-nine patients were treated (46 Az, 43 J); both groups were comparable, except in terms of the sex ratios. The causative agent was determined in 31 cases; streptococcal pneumonia was the most common diagnosis (48%). Cure rates were 93% for J and 80% for Az (p greater than 0.30), as judged by a fall in body temperature and an improvement in clinical condition and in radiographic findings. Among 6 failures, there were 4 cases of empyema (1 J, 3 Az). Of 6 deaths, 2 were pneumonia-dependent (1 J and 1 Az, Haemophilus and Streptococcus pneumoniae, respectively). We conclude that 5-day Az is as effective as 10-day J and that such short-course therapy is an advantage in the treatment of pneumonia caused by macrolide susceptible pathogens.

摘要

在一项针对急性肺炎患者的开放性、多中心随机临床试验中,将使用新型口服大环内酯类抗生素阿奇霉素(Az)的5天疗程与使用另一种大环内酯类抗生素交沙霉素(J)的标准10天疗程进行了比较。共治疗了89例患者(46例使用Az,43例使用J);除性别比例外,两组具有可比性。在31例病例中确定了病原体;链球菌性肺炎是最常见的诊断(48%)。根据体温下降、临床状况和影像学表现的改善情况判断,J组的治愈率为93%,Az组为80%(p>0.30)。在6例治疗失败的病例中,有4例为脓胸(1例使用J,3例使用Az)。在6例死亡病例中,2例与肺炎相关(分别为1例使用J和1例使用Az,病原体分别为嗜血杆菌和肺炎链球菌)。我们得出结论,5天的Az疗程与10天的J疗程效果相同,且这种短疗程治疗在治疗由大环内酯类敏感病原体引起的肺炎方面具有优势。

相似文献

1
[Azithromycin versus josamycin: treatment of 89 cases of acute pneumonia].阿奇霉素与交沙霉素对比:89例急性肺炎的治疗
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1990 Jun;38(5 ( Pt 2)):521-5.
2
Comparative randomized trial of azithromycin versus erythromycin and amoxicillin for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in children.阿奇霉素与红霉素及阿莫西林治疗儿童社区获得性肺炎的比较随机试验
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2003 Feb;35(2):91-8. doi: 10.1002/ppul.10180.
3
Is azithromycin monotherapy as efficacious as cefuroxime plus erythromycin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients?阿奇霉素单药治疗对住院患者社区获得性肺炎的疗效是否与头孢呋辛加红霉素相当?
J Fam Pract. 2000 Oct;49(10):883-4.
4
Efficacy and safety of clarithromycin versus josamycin in the treatment of hospitalized patients with bacterial pneumonia.克拉霉素与交沙霉素治疗住院细菌性肺炎患者的疗效及安全性比较
J Int Med Res. 1990 Mar-Apr;18(2):164-70. doi: 10.1177/030006059001800211.
5
Onset of symptom resolution in adults with acute bacterial rhinosinusitis treated with a single dose of azithromycin extended release compared with 10 days of levofloxacin: a retrospective analysis of a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial.与左氧氟沙星治疗10天相比,单剂量缓释阿奇霉素治疗成人急性细菌性鼻窦炎症状缓解的起始情况:一项随机、双盲、双模拟试验的回顾性分析
Clin Ther. 2007 Dec;29(12):2690-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.12.030.
6
The safety and efficacy of short course (5-day) moxifloxacin vs. azithromycin in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.短期(5天)莫西沙星与阿奇霉素治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重患者的安全性和有效性。
Respir Med. 2000 Nov;94(11):1029-37. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2000.0927.
7
Clinical efficacy and tolerance of two new macrolides, clarithromycin and josamycin, in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.两种新型大环内酯类药物(克拉霉素和交沙霉素)治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期患者的临床疗效及耐受性
J Int Med Res. 1990 Mar-Apr;18(2):171-6. doi: 10.1177/030006059001800212.
8
A topical azithromycin preparation for the treatment of acne vulgaris and rosacea.一种用于治疗寻常痤疮和酒渣鼻的局部用阿奇霉素制剂。
J Dermatolog Treat. 2004 Sep;15(5):295-302. doi: 10.1080/09546630410033808.
9
Ofloxacin in community-acquired lower respiratory infections. A comparison with amoxicillin or erythromycin.
Am J Med. 1989 Dec 29;87(6C):52S-56S.
10
Efficacy and safety of 3-day azithromycin versus 5-day moxifloxacin for the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.3日阿奇霉素与5日莫西沙星治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染的疗效与安全性比较
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007 Jan;29(1):56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.08.043.

引用本文的文献

1
Short- vs long-course antibiotic therapy for pneumonia: a comparison of systematic reviews and guidelines for the SIMI Choosing Wisely Campaign.肺炎的短程与长程抗生素治疗:比较系统评价和 SIMI 明智选择活动的指南。
Intern Emerg Med. 2019 Apr;14(3):377-394. doi: 10.1007/s11739-018-1955-2. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
2
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Efficacy of Short-Course Antibiotic Treatments for Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults.系统评价和荟萃分析成人社区获得性肺炎短期抗生素治疗的疗效。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Aug 27;62(9). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00635-18. Print 2018 Sep.
3
Duration of antimicrobial therapy in community acquired pneumonia: less is more.
社区获得性肺炎抗菌治疗的疗程:少即是多。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014 Jan 21;2014:759138. doi: 10.1155/2014/759138. eCollection 2014.
4
Formulary management of macrolide antibiotics.大环内酯类抗生素的处方集管理
Pharmacoeconomics. 1995 Dec;8(6):491-512. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199508060-00005.
5
Azithromycin. A review of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy.阿奇霉素:抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及临床疗效综述
Drugs. 1992 Nov;44(5):750-99. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199244050-00007.