Suppr超能文献

化疗联合使用集落刺激因子:节省成本和改善预后的机会。

Use of colony-stimulating factors with chemotherapy: opportunities for cost savings and improved outcomes.

机构信息

Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 3300 Whitehaven St NW, Ste 4100, Washington, DC 20007, USA.

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Jun 22;103(12):979-82. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr152. Epub 2011 Jun 13.

Abstract

Myeloid colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) decrease the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) from high-risk chemotherapy regimens administered to patients at 20% or greater risk of FN, but little is known about their use in clinical practice. We evaluated CSF use in a multiregional population-based cohort of lung and colorectal cancer patients (N = 1849). Only 17% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 8% to 26%) patients treated with high-risk chemotherapy regimens received CSFs, compared with 18% (95% CI = 16% to 20%) and 10% (95% CI = 8% to 12%) of patients treated with intermediate- (10%-20% risk of FN) and low-risk (<10% risk of FN) chemotherapy regimens, respectively. Using a generalized estimating equation model, we found that enrollment in a health maintenance organization (HMO) was strongly associated with a lower adjusted odds of discretionary CSF use, compared with non-HMO patients (odds ratio = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.32 to 0.60, P < .001). All statistical tests were two-sided. Overall, 96% (95% CI = 93% to 98%) of CSFs were administered in scenarios where CSF therapy is not recommended by evidence-based guidelines. This finding suggests that policies to decrease CSF use in patients at lower or intermediate risk of FN may yield substantial cost savings without compromising patient outcomes.

摘要

髓系集落刺激因子 (CSF) 可降低高危化疗方案治疗的患者发生发热性中性粒细胞减少症 (FN) 的风险,高危化疗方案的 FN 风险为 20%或更高,但人们对其在临床实践中的应用知之甚少。我们评估了多区域基于人群的肺癌和结直肠癌患者队列 (N = 1849) 中 CSF 的使用情况。仅 17%(95%置信区间 [CI] = 8%至 26%)接受高危化疗方案治疗的患者接受了 CSF,而接受中危(FN 风险 10%-20%)和低危(FN 风险 <10%)化疗方案治疗的患者分别为 18%(95% CI = 16%至 20%)和 10%(95% CI = 8%至 12%)。使用广义估计方程模型,我们发现与非 HMO 患者相比,参加健康维护组织 (HMO) 与使用 CSF 的可能性显著降低(优势比 = 0.44,95% CI = 0.32 至 0.60,P <.001)。所有统计检验均为双侧。总体而言,96%(95% CI = 93%至 98%)的 CSF 是在循证指南不推荐 CSF 治疗的情况下使用的。这一发现表明,针对 FN 风险较低或中等的患者降低 CSF 使用的政策可能会带来大量成本节约,而不会影响患者的预后。

相似文献

1
Use of colony-stimulating factors with chemotherapy: opportunities for cost savings and improved outcomes.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Jun 22;103(12):979-82. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr152. Epub 2011 Jun 13.
2
Personalized medicine and cancer supportive care: appropriate use of colony-stimulating factor support of chemotherapy.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Jun 22;103(12):910-3. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr195. Epub 2011 Jun 13.
3
Primary prophylactic colony-stimulating factors for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD007913. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007913.pub2.
4
Colony-stimulating factors for the management of neutropenia in cancer patients.
Drugs. 2002;62 Suppl 1:1-15. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200262001-00001.
8
Colony-stimulating factors as an adjunct to chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer.
Eur Respir J. 1996 Mar;9(3):596-602. doi: 10.1183/09031936.96.09030596.
9
Prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors: where are we now?
Support Care Cancer. 2010 May;18(5):529-41. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0816-y. Epub 2010 Feb 27.
10
The colony-stimulating factors: use to prevent and treat neutropenia and its complications.
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2004 Dec;4(12):1897-910. doi: 10.1517/14712598.4.12.1897.

引用本文的文献

1
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor promotes regeneration of severed facial nerve in rats.
Front Neurosci. 2024 Dec 5;18:1442614. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1442614. eCollection 2024.
8
Sulfated polymannuroguluronate TGC161 ameliorates leukopenia by inhibiting CD4 T cell apoptosis.
Carbohydr Polym. 2020 Nov 1;247:116728. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116728. Epub 2020 Jul 6.

本文引用的文献

2
Adverse events among the elderly receiving chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Feb 1;28(4):620-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.8485. Epub 2009 Dec 28.
3
Impact of primary prophylaxis on febrile neutropenia within community practices in the US.
J Med Econ. 2009 Sep;12(3):203-10. doi: 10.3111/13696990903238603.
4
Use of colony-stimulating factors for chemotherapy-associated neutropenia: review of current guidelines.
Semin Hematol. 2007 Jul;44(3):148-56. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2007.04.002.
5
Myeloid growth factors. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2007 Feb;5(2):188-202. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2007.0019.
6
2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline.
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jul 1;24(19):3187-205. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.4451. Epub 2006 May 8.
7
NCCN guidelines advocate wider use of colony-stimulating factor.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 May 18;97(10):710-1. doi: 10.1093/jnci/97.10.710.
9
Prognostic importance of comorbidity in a hospital-based cancer registry.
JAMA. 2004 May 26;291(20):2441-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.20.2441.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验