Medical Intensive Care Unit, Department of General Internal Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Crit Care. 2011;15(3):223. doi: 10.1186/cc10109. Epub 2011 Jun 10.
Acute kidney injury is common in intensive care patients and continuous renal replacement therapy is the preferred treatment for this in most centres. Although these techniques have been adopted internationally, there remains significant variation with regard to their clinical application. This is particularly pertinent when one considers that the fundamental questions regarding any treatment, such as initiation, dose and length of treatment, remain a source of debate and have not as yet all been fully answered. In this narrative review we consider the timing of renal replacement therapy, highlighting the relative paucity of high quality data regarding this fundamental question. We examine the role of the usual biochemical criteria as well as conventional clinical indications for commencing renal replacement therapy together with the application of recent classification systems, namely RIFLE and AKIN. We discuss the potential role of biomarkers for acute kidney injury as predictors for the need for renal support and discuss commencing therapy for indications other than acute kidney injury.
急性肾损伤在重症监护患者中很常见,在大多数中心,连续肾脏替代治疗是这种疾病的首选治疗方法。尽管这些技术已经在国际上得到采用,但在其临床应用方面仍存在显著差异。当考虑到任何治疗方法的基本问题,如起始、剂量和治疗时间,仍然存在争议,尚未完全得到解答时,这一点尤其重要。在这篇叙述性评论中,我们考虑了肾脏替代治疗的时机,强调了关于这个基本问题的高质量数据相对较少。我们检查了通常的生化标准以及开始肾脏替代治疗的常规临床指征,以及最近的分类系统,即 RIFLE 和 AKIN 的应用。我们讨论了急性肾损伤生物标志物作为肾脏支持需求预测因子的潜在作用,并讨论了除急性肾损伤以外的指征开始治疗的问题。