Solbakk Jan Helge
Section for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, Norway.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2011 Jul;20(3):341-55. doi: 10.1017/S096318011100003X.
At the end of a paper on international research ethics published in the July-August 2010 issue of the Hastings Center Report, London and Zollman argue the need for grounding our duties in international medical and health-related research within a broader normative framework of social, distributive, and rectificatory justice. The same goes for Thomas Pogge, who, in a whole range of publications during the past years, has argued for a human-rights-based approach to international research. In a thought-provoking paper in the June 2010 issue of the American Journal of Bioethics, Angela J. Ballantyne argues that “the global bioethics priority” in medical and health-related research ethics today is how to do research fairly in an unjust world.
在发表于《黑斯廷斯中心报告》2010年7 - 8月期的一篇关于国际研究伦理的论文结尾,伦敦和佐尔曼主张,有必要将我们在国际医学及与健康相关研究中的职责,置于一个包含社会、分配和矫正正义的更广泛规范框架内。托马斯·波格也是如此,在过去几年的一系列出版物中,他主张采用基于人权的方法进行国际研究。在2010年6月期《美国生物伦理学杂志》上一篇引人深思的论文中,安吉拉·J·巴兰坦指出,当今医学及与健康相关研究伦理中的“全球生物伦理学优先事项”是如何在一个不公正的世界中公正地开展研究。