• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Research planning for the future of psychiatric diagnosis.未来精神疾病诊断的研究规划。
Eur Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;27(7):553-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2009.11.013. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
2
Dimensional approaches to psychiatric diagnosis in DSM-5.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)中精神障碍诊断的维度方法。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2011 Dec;14(4):197-200.
3
Dimensional approaches to psychiatric classification: refining the research agenda for DSM-V: an introduction.精神疾病分类的维度方法:完善《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版的研究议程:引言
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2007;16 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1-5. doi: 10.1002/mpr.209.
4
Paradigm shifts and the development of the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: past experiences and future aspirations.范式转变与《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》的发展:过去的经验与未来的期望。
Can J Psychiatry. 2010 Nov;55(11):692-700. doi: 10.1177/070674371005501102.
5
Relational processes in the DSM-V revision process: comment on the special section.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版修订过程中的关系过程:对特别章节的评论
J Fam Psychol. 2006 Sep;20(3):356-8. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.20.3.356.
6
The DSM-ICD diagnostic approach as an essential bridge between the patient and the "big data".《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》-《国际疾病分类》诊断方法作为患者与“大数据”之间的重要桥梁。
Psychiatriki. 2018 Jul-Sep;29(3):249-256. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2018.293.249.
7
On the road to DSM-V and ICD-11.通往《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版及《国际疾病分类》第十一版之路。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2008 Nov;258 Suppl 5:2-6. doi: 10.1007/s00406-008-5002-6.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Independent review of social and population variation in mental health could improve diagnosis in DSM revisions.对心理健康中的社会和人口变化进行独立审查可以改善 DSM 修订版中的诊断。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 May;32(5):984-93. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0596. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
10
The DSM-V initiative "deconstructing psychosis" in the context of Kraepelin's concept on nosology.在克雷佩林的疾病分类学概念背景下,《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版的“解构精神病”倡议。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2008 Jun;258 Suppl 2:41-7. doi: 10.1007/s00406-008-2009-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Abnormal cerebellar activity and connectivity alterations of the cerebellar-limbic system in post-stroke cognitive impairment: a study based on resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging.中风后认知障碍中小脑活动异常及小脑-边缘系统连接改变:一项基于静息态功能磁共振成像的研究
Front Neurosci. 2025 Mar 19;19:1543760. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1543760. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluating sleep's role in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Evidence from NHANES.评估睡眠在2型糖尿病中的作用:来自美国国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)的证据。
Brain Behav Immun Health. 2025 Jan 23;44:100953. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2025.100953. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Psychometric validation of the Positive Drinking Consequences Questionnaire in adolescents.青少年积极饮酒后果问卷的心理测量学验证
Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2024 Aug;48(8):1565-1576. doi: 10.1111/acer.15387. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
4
Age-related changes in sleep-dependent novel word consolidation.睡眠依赖性新词巩固的年龄相关变化。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 Feb;222:103478. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103478. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
5
Insomnia in the Italian Population During Covid-19 Outbreak: A Snapshot on One Major Risk Factor for Depression and Anxiety.新冠疫情期间意大利人群的失眠状况:关于抑郁和焦虑的一个主要风险因素的简要情况
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Dec 15;11:579107. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.579107. eCollection 2020.
6
Sleep and mental disorders: A meta-analysis of polysomnographic research.睡眠与精神障碍:多导睡眠图研究的荟萃分析
Psychol Bull. 2016 Sep;142(9):969-990. doi: 10.1037/bul0000053. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
7
Procedural validity of the AUDADIS-5 depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder modules: Substance abusers and others in the general population.AUDADIS-5抑郁、焦虑和创伤后应激障碍模块的程序效度:药物滥用者及普通人群中的其他人群
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Jul 1;152:246-56. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.03.027. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
8
The Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-5 (AUDADIS-5): procedural validity of substance use disorders modules through clinical re-appraisal in a general population sample.酒精使用障碍及相关残疾访谈表-5(AUDADIS-5):通过对一般人群样本进行临床重新评估来验证物质使用障碍模块的程序有效性。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Mar 1;148:40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.12.011. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
9
Tracking the impact of translational research in psychiatry: state of the art and perspectives.追踪精神病学转化研究的影响:现状与展望。
J Transl Med. 2012 Aug 28;10:175. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-175.

本文引用的文献

1
On the road to DSM-V and ICD-11.通往《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版及《国际疾病分类》第十一版之路。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2008 Nov;258 Suppl 5:2-6. doi: 10.1007/s00406-008-5002-6.
2
Systematic use of patient-rated depression severity monitoring: is it helpful and feasible in clinical psychiatry?系统使用患者自评抑郁严重程度监测:在临床精神病学中是否有用且可行?
Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Oct;59(10):1148-54. doi: 10.1176/ps.2008.59.10.1148.
3
Reinterpreting comorbidity: a model-based approach to understanding and classifying psychopathology.重新诠释共病现象:一种基于模型的理解和分类精神病理学的方法。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2006;2:111-33. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.2.022305.095213.
4
The structure of common DSM-IV and ICD-10 mental disorders in the Australian general population.澳大利亚普通人群中常见的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)和《国际疾病分类》第十版(ICD-10)精神障碍的结构。
Psychol Med. 2006 Nov;36(11):1593-600. doi: 10.1017/S0033291706008452. Epub 2006 Aug 2.
5
A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7.一种评估广泛性焦虑症的简短量表:GAD-7量表。
Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
6
Psychiatric comorbidity: is more less?精神科共病:是多还是少? (注:原英文表述“is more less?”有误,正确可能是“Is there more or less?” 翻译据此调整)
World Psychiatry. 2004 Feb;3(1):18-23.
7
Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: implications for clinical practice.在STAR*D研究中采用基于测量的护理评估西酞普兰治疗抑郁症的疗效:对临床实践的启示
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;163(1):28-40. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.28.
8
Dimensional versus categorical classification of mental disorders in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and beyond: comment on the special section.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版及以后版本中精神障碍的维度分类与类别分类:对特别章节的评论
J Abnorm Psychol. 2005 Nov;114(4):551-6. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.114.4.551.
9
Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication.全国共病调查复制研究中12个月内DSM-IV疾病的患病率、严重程度及共病情况。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;62(6):617-27. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.617.
10
Using survey results to improve the validity of the standard psychiatric nomenclature.利用调查结果提高标准精神科术语的效度。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004 Dec;61(12):1188-94. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.12.1188.

未来精神疾病诊断的研究规划。

Research planning for the future of psychiatric diagnosis.

机构信息

American Psychiatric Institute for Research and Education, Division of Research, American Psychiatric Association, 1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209, USA.

出版信息

Eur Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;27(7):553-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2009.11.013. Epub 2011 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2009.11.013
PMID:21676595
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3502041/
Abstract

More than 10 years prior to the anticipated 2013 publication of DSM-5, processes were set in motion to assess the research and clinical issues that would best inform future diagnostic classification of mental disorders. These efforts intended to identify the clinical and research needs within various populations, examine the current state of the science to determine the empirical evidence for improving criteria within and across disorders, and stimulate research in areas that could potentially provide evidence for change. In the second phase of the revision process, the American Psychiatric Institute for Research and Education (APIRE) recently completed the 5-year international series of 13 diagnostic conferences convened by APA/APIRE in collaboration with the World Health Organization and the National Institutes of Health (NIH), under a cooperative grant funded by the NIH. From these conferences, the DSM-5 Task Force and Work Groups have developed plans for potential revisions for DSM-5, including the incorporation of dimensional approaches within and across diagnostic groups to clarify heterogeneity, improve diagnostic validity, and enhance clinical case conceptualization. Use of dimensions for measurement-based care has been shown to be feasible in psychiatric and primary care settings and may inform monitoring of disorder threshold, severity, and treatment outcomes. The integration of dimensions with diagnostic categories represents an exciting and potentially transformative approach for DSM-5 to simultaneously address DSM-IV's clinical short-comings and create novel pathways for research in neurobiology, genetics, and psychiatric epidemiology.

摘要

早在 2013 年出版 DSM-5 之前的 10 多年前,就已经开始着手评估最能为未来精神障碍的诊断分类提供信息的研究和临床问题。这些努力旨在确定不同人群中的临床和研究需求,检查当前科学的状况,以确定在障碍内和跨障碍改善标准的经验证据,并在可能提供变革证据的领域激发研究。在修订过程的第二阶段,美国精神病学研究所(APIRE)最近完成了 APA/APIRE 与世界卫生组织和美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)合作,根据 NIH 资助的合作协议,进行的为期 5 年的 13 次国际诊断会议系列。从这些会议中,DSM-5 工作组制定了 DSM-5 可能进行修订的计划,包括在诊断组内和跨诊断组采用维度方法,以澄清异质性,提高诊断有效性,并增强临床病例概念化。在精神病学和初级保健环境中,使用维度进行基于测量的护理已被证明是可行的,并且可以为监测障碍阈值、严重程度和治疗结果提供信息。将维度与诊断类别相结合,为 DSM-5 提供了一种令人兴奋且具有潜在变革性的方法,可以同时解决 DSM-IV 的临床缺陷,并为神经生物学、遗传学和精神流行病学研究开辟新途径。