• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不要把洗澡水和婴儿一起倒掉!

Don'T throw bateman out with the bathwater!

机构信息

Department of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 East 3rd Street, Bloomington, Indiana 47405.

出版信息

Integr Comp Biol. 2005 Nov;45(5):945-51. doi: 10.1093/icb/45.5.945.

DOI:10.1093/icb/45.5.945
PMID:21676845
Abstract

Bateman identified two aspects of sexual selection. The first, called Bateman's principle, is that sexual selection favors increased promiscuity of males but not of females as a result of differences in parental investment in gametes. The second is that the variance in mate number of males is the fundamental cause of a sex difference in fitness variance. We argue that Bateman's insight about the source of sexual selection is more fundamental than his speculation about patterns of parental investment. We show that, when the sex ratio is 1:1, the average female must be as promiscuous as the average male, because each copulation involves one male and one female. Because mean male and female promiscuity are tied together in the same manner as mean male and female fitness, a sex difference in mating propensity must be the result of either (1) a sex difference in the covariance between matings and number offspring, or (2) Fisherian run-away sexual selection, wherein female reluctance to mate is a weak form of female choice. We show how female promiscuity can limit the evolution of male promiscuity, turning the central argument of parental investment theory on its head.

摘要

贝特曼确定了性选择的两个方面。第一个方面,称为贝特曼原理,是指由于配子投资的差异,性选择有利于雄性的滥交增加,但不利于雌性的滥交。第二个方面是,雄性配偶数量的方差是适应度方差存在性别差异的根本原因。我们认为,贝特曼关于性选择来源的洞察力比他关于亲代投资模式的推测更为根本。我们表明,当性别比例为 1:1 时,平均雌性必须像平均雄性一样滥交,因为每次交配都涉及一只雄性和一只雌性。由于平均雄性和雌性的滥交与平均雄性和雌性的适应度以相同的方式联系在一起,因此交配倾向的性别差异必须是以下两种情况之一的结果:(1)交配与后代数量之间的协方差存在性别差异,或(2)费希尔式的逃逸性性选择,其中雌性不愿意交配是一种较弱的雌性选择形式。我们展示了雌性滥交如何限制雄性滥交的进化,从而颠覆了亲代投资理论的核心论点。

相似文献

1
Don'T throw bateman out with the bathwater!不要把洗澡水和婴儿一起倒掉!
Integr Comp Biol. 2005 Nov;45(5):945-51. doi: 10.1093/icb/45.5.945.
2
Mendel's law reveals fatal flaws in Bateman's 1948 study of mating and fitness.孟德尔定律揭示了贝特曼1948年关于交配与适应性研究中的致命缺陷。
Fly (Austin). 2013 Jan-Mar;7(1):28-38. doi: 10.4161/fly.23505. Epub 2013 Jan 1.
3
Patterns of Parental Investment and Sexual Selection in Teleost Fishes: Do They Support Bateman's Principles?硬骨鱼类的亲代投资和性选择模式:它们支持 Bateman 原则吗?
Integr Comp Biol. 2005 Nov;45(5):885-94. doi: 10.1093/icb/45.5.885.
4
Evidence for stronger sexual selection in males than in females using an adapted method of Bateman's classic study of Drosophila melanogaster.利用改良版的巴腾姆(Bateman)经典黑腹果蝇研究方法证明雄性中存在比雌性更强的性选择。
Evolution. 2023 Nov 2;77(11):2420-2430. doi: 10.1093/evolut/qpad151.
5
Terminal Investment Strategies and Male Mate choice: Extreme Tests of Bateman.终端投资策略和男性配偶选择:对 Bateman 的极端检验。
Integr Comp Biol. 2005 Nov;45(5):838-47. doi: 10.1093/icb/45.5.838.
6
Bateman's principle is reversed in a cooperatively breeding bird.贝特曼原理在一种合作繁殖的鸟类中被逆转。
Biol Lett. 2015 Apr;11(4):20150034. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0034.
7
Greater opportunities for sexual selection in male than in female obligate brood parasitic birds.雄性专职巢寄生鸟类比雌性专职巢寄生鸟类有更多的性选择机会。
J Evol Biol. 2019 Nov;32(11):1310-1315. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13537. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
8
The measure and significance of Bateman's principles.贝特曼原理的度量及意义。
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Mar 19;281(1782):20132973. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2973. Print 2014 May 7.
9
Do metrics of sexual selection conform to Bateman's principles in a wind-pollinated plant?风媒传粉植物的性选择测度是否符合贝特曼原则?
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Jun 26;286(1905):20190532. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0532. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
10
Bateman's Principle and Simultaneous Hermaphrodites: A Paradox.贝特曼原理与雌雄同体:一个悖论。
Integr Comp Biol. 2005 Nov;45(5):856-73. doi: 10.1093/icb/45.5.856.

引用本文的文献

1
Diet quality impairs male and female reproductive performance and affects the opportunity for selection in an insect model.饮食质量会损害昆虫模型中雄性和雌性的生殖性能,并影响选择机会。
Ecol Evol. 2022 Nov 22;12(11):e9533. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9533. eCollection 2022 Nov.
2
Evolutionary effects of nitrogen are not easily predicted from ecological responses.氮的进化效应不容易从生态反应中预测。
Am J Bot. 2022 Nov;109(11):1741-1756. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.16095. Epub 2022 Nov 13.
3
Degree of anisogamy is unrelated to the intensity of sexual selection.
雌雄配子大小差异程度与性选择强度无关。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 30;11(1):19424. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98616-2.
4
The repeatable opportunity for selection differs between pre- and postcopulatory fitness components.交配前和交配后适合度成分之间可供选择的可重复机会有所不同。
Evol Lett. 2020 Dec 25;5(1):101-114. doi: 10.1002/evl3.210. eCollection 2021 Feb.
5
Equal fitness among alternative mating strategies in a harem polygynous insect.在一个后宫多配偶制昆虫中,替代交配策略之间的适应性相等。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Jul 29;287(1931):20200975. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0975.
6
The opportunity for sexual selection and the evolution of non-responsiveness to pesticides, sterility inducers and contraceptives.性选择的机会以及对杀虫剂、不育诱导剂和避孕药产生无反应性的进化。
Heliyon. 2018 Nov 29;4(11):e00943. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00943. eCollection 2018 Nov.
7
Structure of sexual networks determines the operation of sexual selection.性网络的结构决定了性选择的运作。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jan 2;115(1):E53-E61. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1710450115. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
8
Why patterns of assortative mating are key to study sexual selection and how to measure them.为什么选型交配模式是研究性选择的关键以及如何衡量这些模式。
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2016;70:209-220. doi: 10.1007/s00265-015-2041-7. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
9
The measure and significance of Bateman's principles.贝特曼原理的度量及意义。
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Mar 19;281(1782):20132973. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2973. Print 2014 May 7.
10
Polyandry: the history of a revolution.一妻多夫制:一场革命的历史。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Jan 21;368(1613):20120335. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0335. Print 2013 Mar 5.