• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

NEI-RQL-42 问卷的分量表评估与 Rasch 分析。

Subscale assessment of the NEI-RQL-42 questionnaire with Rasch analysis.

机构信息

Department of Optometry and Vision Science, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University of South Australia, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jul 29;52(8):5685-94. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-67951.

DOI:10.1167/iovs.10-67951
PMID:21676909
Abstract

PURPOSE

To explore the psychometric properties of the 13 subscales of the NEI-RQL-42 questionnaire using Rasch analysis.

METHODS

The NEI-RQL-42 is a refractive error-related quality of life (QoL) questionnaire with a complex design; its 13 subscales contain 42 questions, which include 16 different question/response category formats. It was completed by 100 laser refractive surgery subjects (spectacle and contact lens wearers) pre- and postoperatively. Rasch analysis was used to assess the use of response categories, success in measuring a single trait per subscale (unidimensionality), ability to discriminate persons (precision), and targeting of the questions to person QoL.

RESULTS

Response categories were misused in four subscales (clarity of vision, diurnal fluctuation, symptoms, and appearance), which required repair before further analyses. Six subscales contained items that did not contribute to a single trait measurement (multidimensional). All subscales were found to be inadequate at distinguishing between persons (person separation >2.0), and targeting of the questions to QoL was poor for six subscales.

CONCLUSIONS

The NEI-RQL-42 questionnaire is deficient for all psychometric properties tested. Clinicians or researchers wishing to measure QoL related to refractive error correction should consider other questionnaires that have been rigorously developed and meet standard psychometric properties.

摘要

目的

使用 Rasch 分析探讨 NEI-RQL-42 问卷的 13 个分量表的心理计量特性。

方法

NEI-RQL-42 是一种与屈光不正相关的生活质量(QoL)问卷,设计复杂;其 13 个分量表包含 42 个问题,其中包含 16 种不同的问题/应答类别格式。它由 100 名激光屈光手术患者(戴眼镜和隐形眼镜者)术前和术后完成。使用 Rasch 分析评估响应类别、每个分量表成功测量单一特征的能力(单维性)、区分个体的能力(精度)以及问题对个体 QoL 的针对性。

结果

四个分量表(视力清晰度、昼夜波动、症状和外观)的响应类别被误用,在进一步分析之前需要修复。六个分量表包含不能对单一特征测量做出贡献的项目(多维)。所有分量表在区分个体方面都不足(个体分离>2.0),并且六个分量表的问题对 QoL 的针对性都很差。

结论

NEI-RQL-42 问卷在所有测试的心理计量特性方面都存在缺陷。希望测量与屈光不正矫正相关的 QoL 的临床医生或研究人员应考虑其他经过严格开发并符合标准心理计量特性的问卷。

相似文献

1
Subscale assessment of the NEI-RQL-42 questionnaire with Rasch analysis.NEI-RQL-42 问卷的分量表评估与 Rasch 分析。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jul 29;52(8):5685-94. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-67951.
2
Psychometric properties of the NEI-RQL-42 questionnaire in keratoconus.角膜混浊患者 NEI-RQL-42 问卷的心理测量特性。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Oct 25;53(11):7370-4. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9969.
3
Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute-Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument.美国国立眼科研究所屈光不正生活质量量表的心理测量学特性。
Ophthalmology. 2003 Dec;110(12):2292-301. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2002.07.001.
4
The Turkish version of the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life Instrument: translation, validity and reliability.土耳其版国家眼科研究所屈光不正生活质量量表:翻译、效度与信度
Qual Life Res. 2008 Dec;17(10):1269-76. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9407-5. Epub 2008 Nov 2.
5
The effect of overnight contact lens corneal reshaping on refractive error-specific quality of life.夜间角膜塑形术对特定屈光不正生活质量的影响。
Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Jun;83(6):354-9. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000221401.33776.54.
6
Quality of life of myopic subjects with different methods of visual correction using the NEI RQL-42 questionnaire.使用 NEI RQL-42 问卷评估不同视觉矫正方法对近视患者生活质量的影响。
Eye Contact Lens. 2012 Mar;38(2):116-21. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e3182480e97.
7
Psychometric properties of the Greek NEI-RQL-42.希腊版国民眼科研究所视觉功能问卷42项的心理测量特性。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2012 May-Jun;22(3):466-76. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000062.
8
Sensitivity of the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument to refractive surgery outcomes.美国国立眼科研究所屈光不正生活质量量表对屈光手术效果的敏感性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Dec;31(12):2313-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.04.033.
9
Rasch analysis of the quality of life and vision function questionnaire.生活质量与视觉功能问卷的拉施分析
Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Jul;86(7):E836-44. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181ae1ec7.
10
Reliability and validity of refractive error-specific quality-of-life instruments.屈光不正特异性生活质量量表的信度和效度
Arch Ophthalmol. 2003 Sep;121(9):1289-96. doi: 10.1001/archopht.121.9.1289.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric Evaluation and Computerized Adaptive Testing Simulations of Myopic Refractive Intervention Quality of Life Item Banks.近视屈光干预生活质量题库的心理测量评估与计算机自适应测试模拟
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2025 Aug 1;14(8):4. doi: 10.1167/tvst.14.8.4.
2
Near vision assessment for adults using the NIH Toolbox.使用美国国立卫生研究院工具箱对成年人进行近视力评估。
Front Neurol. 2025 Jan 20;16:1533382. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1533382. eCollection 2025.
3
Catquest-9SF questionnaire: Validation in a Greek-speaking population using Rasch analysis.
Catquest-9SF 问卷:基于 Rasch 分析的希腊语人群验证。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 7;17(12):e0278683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278683. eCollection 2022.
4
Living with presbyopia: experiences from a virtual roundtable dialogue among impacted individuals and healthcare professionals.与老花眼共存:受影响个体和医疗保健专业人员虚拟圆桌对话的体验。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 May 5;22(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02432-9.
5
Development of the Near Vision Presbyopia Task-based Questionnaire for use in evaluating the impact of presbyopia.用于评估老花眼影响的近视力老花眼任务问卷的开发。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021 Dec 2;5(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00378-y.
6
Bilateral Ultrathin Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty vs. Bilateral Penetrating Keratoplasty in Fuchs' Dystrophy: Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations, Contrast Sensitivity and Quality of Life.双眼超薄Descemet膜剥除自动内皮角膜移植术与双眼穿透性角膜移植术治疗Fuchs角膜内皮营养不良:角膜高阶像差、对比敏感度和生活质量
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Feb 3;57(2):133. doi: 10.3390/medicina57020133.
7
Multifocal acceptance score to evaluate vision: MAS-2EV.多焦点接受评分评估视力:MAS-2EV。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 14;11(1):1397. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81059-0.
8
Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review.老花眼中患者报告的结局指标:文献综述
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul 12;5(1):e000453. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000453. eCollection 2020.
9
Development and Validation of the "Keratoconus End-Points Assessment Questionnaire" (KEPAQ), a Disease-Specific Instrument for Evaluating Subjective Emotional Distress and Visual Function Through Rasch Analysis.“圆锥角膜终点评估问卷”(KEPAQ)的开发与验证,这是一种通过拉施分析评估主观情绪困扰和视觉功能的疾病特异性工具。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 May 12;14:1287-1296. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S254370. eCollection 2020.
10
Case for a new corticosteroid treatment trial in optic neuritis: review of updated evidence.视神经炎新皮质类固醇治疗试验的病例:最新证据综述
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020 Jan;91(1):9-14. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-321653. Epub 2019 Nov 18.