• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 NEI RQL-42 问卷评估不同视觉矫正方法对近视患者生活质量的影响。

Quality of life of myopic subjects with different methods of visual correction using the NEI RQL-42 questionnaire.

机构信息

Department of Physics, Clinical and Experimental Optometry Research Lab, Center of Physics, School of Sciences, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.

出版信息

Eye Contact Lens. 2012 Mar;38(2):116-21. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e3182480e97.

DOI:10.1097/ICL.0b013e3182480e97
PMID:22293405
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate different aspects of the visual-related quality of life using the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life (NEI RQL)-42 questionnaire in low and moderate myopic subjects corrected with different refractive treatments including laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), orthokeratology (OK), soft contact lenses (SCLs), and spectacles.

METHODS

The NEI RQL-42 questionnaire was administered to 217 subjects at one single clinic. All the questions consisted of 13 different subscales that were analyzed separately. The results from subjects with -1.00 to -3.00 diopter myopia corrected with LASIK (n=41), OK (n=37), SCLs (n=44), or spectacles (n=45) were compared with each other and with emmetropic subjects (n=50).

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences among all groups were found in all subscales, except for satisfaction with correction (P=0.135). The average decrease in quality of life compared with emmetropes were -7.1% (P=0.021) for LASIK, -13.0% (P<0.001) for OK, -15.8% (P<0.001) for spectacles, and -17.3% (P<0.001) for SCLs.

CONCLUSIONS

Although all patients in each group were considered to be successfully visually corrected, quality of life related to vision was markedly different in certain NEI RQL-42 categories. LASIK showed the lowest average decrease in quality of vision compared with emmetropes. OK was comparable with LASIK in independence of visual correction, and SCL wear was superior to LASIK and OK lens wear in glare. Except for glare and diurnal fluctuations, contact lenses (SCL and OK) were comparable with or superior to spectacle correction.

摘要

目的

使用国家眼科研究所屈光不正生活质量问卷(NEI RQL)-42 评估经不同屈光矫正治疗(包括激光辅助原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)、角膜塑形术(OK)、软性隐形眼镜(SCL)和眼镜)矫正的低度和中度近视患者的视觉相关生活质量的不同方面。

方法

在一家诊所,对 217 名患者进行了 NEI RQL-42 问卷评估。所有问题均由 13 个不同的亚量表组成,分别进行分析。将近视 -1.00 至 -3.00 屈光度经 LASIK(n=41)、OK(n=37)、SCL(n=44)或眼镜(n=45)矫正的患者与正视眼患者(n=50)的结果进行比较。

结果

在所有亚量表中,各组之间均存在统计学显著差异,除了矫正满意度(P=0.135)外。与正视眼相比,生活质量平均下降幅度分别为 LASIK 组 -7.1%(P=0.021)、OK 组 -13.0%(P<0.001)、眼镜组 -15.8%(P<0.001)和 SCL 组 -17.3%(P<0.001)。

结论

虽然每组中的所有患者都被认为视力矫正成功,但在某些 NEI RQL-42 类别中,视觉相关的生活质量存在明显差异。与正视眼相比,LASIK 组的视力质量平均下降幅度最低。在视觉矫正的独立性方面,OK 与 LASIK 相当,而在眩光方面,SCL 比 LASIK 和 OK 镜片更具优势。除了眩光和昼夜波动外,隐形眼镜(SCL 和 OK)与眼镜矫正相当或更优。

相似文献

1
Quality of life of myopic subjects with different methods of visual correction using the NEI RQL-42 questionnaire.使用 NEI RQL-42 问卷评估不同视觉矫正方法对近视患者生活质量的影响。
Eye Contact Lens. 2012 Mar;38(2):116-21. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e3182480e97.
2
Sensitivity of the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument to refractive surgery outcomes.美国国立眼科研究所屈光不正生活质量量表对屈光手术效果的敏感性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Dec;31(12):2313-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.04.033.
3
Vision-Specific Quality of Life: Laser-Assisted in situ Keratomileusis Versus Overnight Contact Lens Wear.特定视力的生活质量:准分子原位角膜磨镶术与夜间佩戴隐形眼镜的比较。
Eye Contact Lens. 2019 Jan;45(1):34-39. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000538.
4
Myopia control with orthokeratology contact lenses in Spain: a comparison of vision-related quality-of-life measures between orthokeratology contact lenses and single-vision spectacles.西班牙角膜塑形术控制近视:角膜塑形术接触镜与单焦眼镜的视力相关生活质量测量指标比较。
Eye Contact Lens. 2013 Mar;39(2):153-7. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e31827a0241.
5
Functional outcomes and patient satisfaction after laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of myopia.准分子原位角膜磨镶术矫正近视后的功能结果及患者满意度
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Oct;31(10):1943-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.08.022.
6
Corneal morphology and visual outcomes in LASIK patients after orthokeratology: A pilot study.角膜塑形术后 LASIK 患者的角膜形态和视觉效果:一项初步研究。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018 Dec;41(6):507-512. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
7
[Multicentric study regarding assessment of the driving ability of LASIK and orthokeratology patients compared with conventionally corrected persons].[关于LASIK和角膜塑形术患者与传统矫正者相比驾驶能力评估的多中心研究]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2013 Mar;230(3):255-64. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1328253. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
8
Patient and parent perceptions of myopia modalities.患者和家长对近视矫正方式的看法。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2023 Apr;46(2):101772. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2022.101772. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
9
The effect of overnight contact lens corneal reshaping on refractive error-specific quality of life.夜间角膜塑形术对特定屈光不正生活质量的影响。
Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Jun;83(6):354-9. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000221401.33776.54.
10
[Quality of life after LASIK: part II. Quality of life and satisfaction of a population of patients treated with LASIK].[准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后的生活质量:第二部分。接受准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗患者群体的生活质量与满意度]
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2011 May;34(5):294-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2011.01.007. Epub 2011 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of dual-focus contact lenses and DIMS spectacle lenses for myopia control in patients with low astigmatism: a retrospective study.双焦点隐形眼镜与离焦软镜对低散光近视患者近视控制的比较有效性:一项回顾性研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 18;12:1524700. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1524700. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparative study on the quality of life and clinical efficacy of orthokeratology lens, defocus spectacle lens and single vision spectacles in myopic children and adolescents in China.中国近视儿童青少年使用角膜塑形镜、离焦眼镜和单光眼镜的生活质量及临床疗效比较研究
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2025 May 27;10(1):e002168. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002168.
3
Peripheral Defocus in Orthokeratology Myopia Correction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
角膜塑形术矫正近视中的周边离焦:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 21;14(3):662. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030662.
4
Quality of Life After Laser Vision Correction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.激光视力矫正后的生活质量:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan 6;2025:8833830. doi: 10.1155/joph/8833830. eCollection 2025.
5
Benefits and risks of orthokeratology treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.角膜塑形术治疗的益处和风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Jun 21;44(1):239. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03175-w.
6
Comparison of myopic control between orthokeratology contact lenses and defocus incorporated multiple segments spectacle lenses.角膜塑形术与离焦多焦点框架眼镜对近视控制效果的比较。
Int J Med Sci. 2024 May 19;21(7):1329-1336. doi: 10.7150/ijms.93643. eCollection 2024.
7
The Effect of Myopic Control between the Dual-Focus Contact Lenses and High-Concentration Atropine in an Asian Population.双焦点隐形眼镜与高浓度阿托品对亚洲人群近视控制的效果。
Life (Basel). 2024 Jan 13;14(1):118. doi: 10.3390/life14010118.
8
Quality of life following LASIK surgery at a tertiary center in North India.印度北部一家三级中心的 LASIK 手术后的生活质量。
Acta Biomed. 2023 Oct 17;94(5):e2023216. doi: 10.23750/abm.v94i5.14791.
9
The impact of spectacle correction on the well-being of children with vision impairment due to uncorrected refractive error: a systematic review.未矫正屈光不正导致视力损害儿童戴镜矫正对其健康状况的影响:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 18;23(1):1575. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16484-z.
10
Comparison of Functional Vision and Eye-Related Quality of Life between Myopic Children Treated with Orthokeratology and Single-Vision Spectacles in Southern China.中国南方地区接受角膜塑形术和单光眼镜治疗的近视儿童的功能性视力和与眼睛相关的生活质量比较。
J Ophthalmol. 2023 Apr 8;2023:7437935. doi: 10.1155/2023/7437935. eCollection 2023.