• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急慢性腹股沟疝手术的风险因素和结果。

Risk factors and outcomes of acute versus elective groin hernia surgery.

机构信息

VA Boston Healthcare System and Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Sep;213(3):363-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.05.008. Epub 2011 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.05.008
PMID:21680204
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hernia characteristics and patient factors associated with acute compared with elective groin hernia surgery are unknown.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study of 1,034 consecutive groin hernia repair cases performed between 2001 and 2009 at a single Veterans Affairs Hospital was conducted. Patient variables, hernia characteristics, time to surgery, and morbidity and mortality outcomes were abstracted and compared between acute and elective hernia repairs. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for the two groups was also performed. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify associations between type of surgery, patient demographics, and hernia characteristics.

RESULTS

Compared with 971 elective repair patients, the 63 acute repair patients had a higher rate of femoral hernias (2.5% vs 7.4%, p = 0.03), a higher rate of scrotal hernias (16.2% vs 32.4%, p = 0.0006), and a higher rate of recurrent hernias (16.7% vs 30.9%, p = 0.0026). Patient age, femoral, scrotal, and recurrent hernias were significantly associated with acute hernia presentation on univariate and multivariable analyses. Complications occurred in 27% and 15.1% of acute and elective repair patients, respectively (p = 0.01). Intraoperative organ resection was required in 7 (11.1%) acute hernia repairs, and in 2 (0.2%) elective repairs (p < 0.0001). Three acute repair patients (4.8%) underwent reoperation within 30 days after surgery, compared with 15 elective repair patients (1.5%), p = 0.05. Age-adjusted Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a shorter time to death among acute repair patients compared with elective repair patients (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Age, femoral, scrotal, and recurrent groin hernias are associated with increased risk for acute hernia surgery. Acute hernia repair carries a higher morbidity and lower survival.

摘要

背景

与择期腹股沟疝手术相比,急性腹股沟疝手术的疝特征和患者因素尚不清楚。

研究设计

对 2001 年至 2009 年期间在一家退伍军人事务医院进行的 1034 例连续腹股沟疝修补术进行回顾性研究。提取患者变量、疝特征、手术时间以及发病率和死亡率结果,并在急性和择期疝修补术之间进行比较。对两组进行 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析。进行逻辑回归分析以确定手术类型、患者人口统计学和疝特征之间的关联。

结果

与 971 例择期修复患者相比,63 例急性修复患者中股疝发生率较高(2.5%对 7.4%,p=0.03),鞘膜疝发生率较高(16.2%对 32.4%,p=0.0006),复发性疝发生率较高(16.7%对 30.9%,p=0.0026)。在单变量和多变量分析中,患者年龄、股疝、鞘膜疝和复发性疝与急性疝表现显著相关。并发症分别发生在 27%和 15.1%的急性和择期修复患者中(p=0.01)。7 例(11.1%)急性疝修复术需要术中切除器官,2 例(0.2%)择期修复术需要切除器官(p<0.0001)。3 例(4.8%)急性修复患者在手术后 30 天内再次手术,而 15 例(1.5%)择期修复患者再次手术,p=0.05。年龄调整的 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析显示,急性修复患者的死亡时间短于择期修复患者(p<0.0001)。

结论

年龄、股疝、鞘膜疝和复发性腹股沟疝与急性疝手术风险增加相关。急性疝修复术的发病率较高,生存率较低。

相似文献

1
Risk factors and outcomes of acute versus elective groin hernia surgery.急慢性腹股沟疝手术的风险因素和结果。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Sep;213(3):363-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.05.008. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
2
Emergency femoral hernia repair: a study based on a national register.急诊股疝修补术:一项基于国家登记处的研究
Ann Surg. 2009 Apr;249(4):672-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819ed943.
3
Nationwide prospective study of outcomes after elective incisional hernia repair.全国性择期切口疝修补术后结局的前瞻性研究。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Feb;216(2):217-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.10.013. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
4
Open versus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in VA hospitals.退伍军人事务部医院中开放性与血管腔内腹主动脉瘤修复术的比较
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Apr;202(4):577-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.01.005.
5
Predictors of recurrence in veteran patients with umbilical hernia: single center experience.退伍军人脐疝患者复发的预测因素:单中心经验
Am J Surg. 2006 Nov;192(5):627-30. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.08.022.
6
Prevalence, outcomes, and a risk-benefit analysis of diaphragmatic hernia admissions: an examination of the National Inpatient Sample database.膈疝住院患者的患病率、结局和风险-效益分析:对国家住院患者样本数据库的考察。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Oct;142(4):747-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.06.038. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
7
Predictors for duration of hospital stay after abdominal wall hernia repairs.腹壁疝修补术后住院时间的预测因素。
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2012 Jan-Feb;107(1):47-51.
8
More than 150 consecutive open umbilical hernia repairs in a major Veterans Administration Medical Center.一家大型退伍军人管理局医疗中心连续进行了150多例开放性脐疝修补手术。
Am J Surg. 2008 Nov;196(5):647-51. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.07.018.
9
Longterm results of a prospective study of 225 femoral hernia repairs: indications for tissue and mesh repair.225例股疝修补术前瞻性研究的长期结果:组织修补和补片修补的指征
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Sep;207(3):360-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.04.018. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
10
Improved outcomes with the Prolene Hernia System mesh compared with the time-honored Lichtenstein onlay mesh repair for inguinal hernia repair.与历史悠久的Lichtenstein修补术使用的平片修补腹股沟疝相比,使用普理灵疝修补系统补片的治疗效果更佳。
Am J Surg. 2007 Jun;193(6):697-701. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.08.087.

引用本文的文献

1
Natural history of groin hernias in women and factors leading to delay in repair: a single-institution study.女性腹股沟疝的自然病史及导致修复延迟的因素:一项单机构研究。
Surg Endosc. 2025 May;39(5):3377-3385. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11709-1. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
2
Mesh versus non-mesh for emergency groin hernia repair.网片修补与非网片修补用于急诊腹股沟疝修补术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD015160. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015160.pub2.
3
Evaluating the Natural History of Groin Hernia from an "Unplanned" Watchful Waiting Strategy.
从“非计划性”观察等待策略评估腹股沟疝的自然病史。
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 19;12(12):4127. doi: 10.3390/jcm12124127.
4
Implementing an outpatient surgical management in moderated-high risk patients with groin hernia repair.实施门诊手术管理中度高危患者腹股沟疝修补术。
Hernia. 2023 Oct;27(5):1307-1313. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02813-z. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
5
Infection and Recurrence Rates in Rural Inguinal Hernia Repair.农村腹股沟疝修补术的感染率和复发率
Kans J Med. 2023 Mar 15;16(1):65-68. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol16.18552. eCollection 2023.
6
Robot-assisted general surgery is safe during the learning curve: a 5-year Australian experience.机器人辅助普通外科手术在学习曲线期间是安全的:澳大利亚 5 年经验。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1541-1546. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01560-8. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
7
Neutrophil to C-reactive protein ratio: An estimating factor for intestinal ischemia before the surgery of incarcerated inguinal hernia.中性粒细胞与C反应蛋白比值:嵌顿性腹股沟疝手术前肠道缺血的一个评估因素。
North Clin Istanb. 2021 Dec 31;8(6):575-580. doi: 10.14744/nci.2021.26878. eCollection 2021.
8
A steady stream of knowledge: decreased urinary retention after implementation of ERAS protocols in ambulatory minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair.知识的稳定流动:在门诊微创腹股沟疝修补中实施 ERAS 方案后,尿潴留减少。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):6742-6750. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08950-9. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
9
Hematemesis Secondary to Complex Incarcerated Pantaloon Hernia.复杂嵌顿性马裤疝继发呕血
Cureus. 2021 Mar 8;13(3):e13770. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13770.
10
Socioeconomic disparities in the complexity of hernias evaluated at Emergency Departments across the United States.美国各地急诊部评估的疝病复杂性的社会经济差异。
Am J Surg. 2019 Sep;218(3):551-559. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.11.042. Epub 2018 Dec 14.