Division of Immunobiology and Bioinformatics, Athlomics Pty Ltd, Jephson Street, Toowong, QLD 4066, Australia.
Crit Care. 2011 Jun 20;15(3):R149. doi: 10.1186/cc10274.
INTRODUCTION: Sepsis is a complex immunological response to infection characterized by early hyper-inflammation followed by severe and protracted immunosuppression, suggesting that a multi-marker approach has the greatest clinical utility for early detection, within a clinical environment focused on Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) differentiation. Pre-clinical research using an equine sepsis model identified a panel of gene expression biomarkers that define the early aberrant immune activation. Thus, the primary objective was to apply these gene expression biomarkers to distinguish patients with sepsis from those who had undergone major open surgery and had clinical outcomes consistent with systemic inflammation due to physical trauma and wound healing. METHODS: This was a multi-centre, prospective clinical trial conducted across four tertiary critical care settings in Australia. Sepsis patients were recruited if they met the 1992 Consensus Statement criteria and had clinical evidence of systemic infection based on microbiology diagnoses (n = 27). Participants in the post-surgical (PS) group were recruited pre-operatively and blood samples collected within 24 hours following surgery (n = 38). Healthy controls (HC) included hospital staff with no known concurrent illnesses (n = 20). Each participant had minimally 5 ml of PAXgene blood collected for leucocyte RNA isolation and gene expression analyses. Affymetrix array and multiplex tandem (MT)-PCR studies were conducted to evaluate transcriptional profiles in circulating white blood cells applying a set of 42 molecular markers that had been identified a priori. A LogitBoost algorithm was used to create a machine learning diagnostic rule to predict sepsis outcomes. RESULTS: Based on preliminary microarray analyses comparing HC and sepsis groups, a panel of 42-gene expression markers were identified that represented key innate and adaptive immune function, cell cycling, WBC differentiation, extracellular remodelling and immune modulation pathways. Comparisons against GEO data confirmed the definitive separation of the sepsis cohort. Quantitative PCR results suggest the capacity for this test to differentiate severe systemic inflammation from HC is 92%. The area under the curve (AUC) receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve findings demonstrated sepsis prediction within a mixed inflammatory population, was between 86 and 92%. CONCLUSIONS: This novel molecular biomarker test has a clinically relevant sensitivity and specificity profile, and has the capacity for early detection of sepsis via the monitoring of critical care patients.
简介:败血症是一种复杂的免疫反应,其特征是感染早期的过度炎症,随后是严重和持久的免疫抑制,这表明多标志物方法对于在以全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)分化为重点的临床环境中进行早期检测具有最大的临床效用。使用马败血症模型的临床前研究确定了一组基因表达生物标志物,这些标志物定义了早期异常的免疫激活。因此,主要目标是应用这些基因表达生物标志物来区分败血症患者与那些接受过大手术且临床结局与物理创伤和伤口愈合引起的全身炎症一致的患者。
方法:这是一项在澳大利亚四个三级重症监护中心进行的多中心前瞻性临床试验。如果符合 1992 年共识声明标准且临床证据表明存在全身感染的败血症患者(n=27),则招募败血症患者。术后(PS)组的参与者在术前招募,并在手术后 24 小时内采集血液样本(n=38)。健康对照组(HC)包括无已知合并症的医院工作人员(n=20)。每位参与者均采集了至少 5 毫升 PAXgene 血液,用于白细胞 RNA 分离和基因表达分析。应用一组预先确定的 42 个分子标记物,进行 Affymetrix 阵列和多重串联(MT)-PCR 研究,以评估循环白细胞中的转录谱。使用 LogitBoost 算法创建机器学习诊断规则来预测败血症结果。
结果:基于比较 HC 和败血症组的初步微阵列分析,确定了一组 42 个基因表达标志物,这些标志物代表关键的先天和适应性免疫功能、细胞周期、白细胞分化、细胞外重塑和免疫调节途径。与 GEO 数据的比较证实了该败血症队列的明确分离。定量 PCR 结果表明,该测试区分严重全身炎症与 HC 的能力为 92%。曲线下面积(AUC)接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线的发现表明,在混合炎症人群中进行败血症预测的 AUC 在 86%至 92%之间。
结论:这种新的分子生物标志物测试具有临床相关的敏感性和特异性特征,并且通过监测重症监护患者,具有早期检测败血症的能力。
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2014-3
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015-6
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025-8-12
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025-1-3
N Engl J Med. 2010-4-22
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2009-8
Nat Med. 2009-5
Thromb Haemost. 2009-1
Nat Genet. 2007-3