Bauer Michael, Giamarellos-Bourboulis Evangelos J, Kortgen Andreas, Möller Eva, Felsmann Karen, Cavaillon Jean Marc, Guntinas-Lichius Orlando, Rutschmann Olivier, Ruryk Andriy, Kohl Matthias, Wlotzka Britta, Rußwurm Stefan, Marshall John C, Reinhart Konrad
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07646 Jena, Germany; Center for Sepsis Control & Care, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07646 Jena, Germany.
Center for Sepsis Control & Care, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07646 Jena, Germany; 4th Department of Internal Medicine, University of Athens, Medical School, 1 Rimini Str, 12462 Athens, Greece.
EBioMedicine. 2016 Apr;6:114-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
Development of a dysregulated immune response discriminates sepsis from uncomplicated infection. Currently used biomarkers fail to describe simultaneously occurring pro- and anti-inflammatory responses potentially amenable to therapy. Marker candidates were screened by microarray and, after transfer to a platform allowing point-of-care testing, validated in a confirmation set of 246 medical and surgical patients. We identified up-regulated pathways reflecting innate effector mechanisms, while down-regulated pathways related to adaptive lymphocyte functions. A panel of markers composed of three up- (Toll-like receptor 5; Protectin; Clusterin) and 4 down-regulated transcripts (Fibrinogen-like 2; Interleukin-7 receptor; Major histocompatibility complex class II, DP alpha1; Carboxypeptidase, vitellogenic-like) described the magnitude of immune alterations. The created gene expression score was significantly greater in patients with definite as well as with possible/probable infection than with no infection (median (Q25/Q75): 80 (60/101)) and 81 (58/97 vs. 49 (27/66), AUC-ROC=0.812 (95%-CI 0.755-0.869), p<0.0001). Down-regulated lymphocyte markers were associated with prognosis with good sensitivity but limited specificity. Quantifying systemic inflammation by assessment of both pro- and anti-inflammatory innate and adaptive immune responses provides a novel option to identify patients-at-risk and may facilitate immune interventions in sepsis.
失调的免疫反应的发展可区分脓毒症与单纯感染。目前使用的生物标志物无法同时描述可能适合治疗的促炎和抗炎反应。通过微阵列筛选标志物候选物,并在转移到允许即时检测的平台后,在246名内科和外科患者的确认组中进行验证。我们确定了反映先天效应机制的上调通路,而与适应性淋巴细胞功能相关的通路则下调。由三个上调转录本(Toll样受体5;保护素;聚集素)和四个下调转录本(纤维蛋白原样蛋白2;白细胞介素-7受体;主要组织相容性复合体II类,DPα1;卵黄生成样羧肽酶)组成的一组标志物描述了免疫改变的程度。在确诊以及可能/疑似感染的患者中,所创建的基因表达评分显著高于无感染患者(中位数(第25/75四分位数):80(60/101))和81(58/97对49(27/66)),AUC-ROC=0.812(95%置信区间0.755-0.869),p<0.0001)。下调的淋巴细胞标志物与预后相关,敏感性良好但特异性有限。通过评估促炎和抗炎的先天及适应性免疫反应来量化全身炎症,为识别高危患者提供了一种新选择,并可能促进脓毒症的免疫干预。