Suppr超能文献

颈椎在前向和追尾汽车碰撞后扭伤的状况。

Cervical status after neck sprains in frontal and rear-end car impacts.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Injury. 2012 Apr;43(4):423-30. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.05.020. Epub 2011 Jun 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the cervical status after neck sprains in frontal and rear-end car impacts with respect to earlier proposed neck-sprain injury mechanisms, rotated head at impact, and the seat-belt geometry.

METHODS

A prospective, multidisciplinary, in-depth study was made based on 23 car occupants injured in frontal impacts and 108 injured in rear-end impacts. The active neck mobility was measured in protraction-retraction, flexion-extension, side bending right-left, and rotation right-left. This was done in the acute phase and then three and twelve months later. The maximum range, increase in pain, and level of pain were recorded for each movement. A subgroup with increased pain during movements towards the impact direction, but not in the opposite one, so-called isolated contra-directional pain (ICP), was further analysed. The side bending and rotation mobility were studied in another subgroup, in which the head was rotated inwards or outwards relative the car, i.e. away from or towards the diagonal part of the seat belt.

RESULTS

Rear-end impacts more often than frontal impacts caused greater restrictions of the cervical mobility and more frequently increased pain at the three different times that measurements were recorded, but, with few exceptions, the differences for each movement were not statistically significant. Increased pain during extension was more often noted after rear-end impacts. ICP during pro-/retraction was also more often noted after rear-end impacts. Head-inward rotation in rear-end impacts caused a more restricted mobility in the same direction at the primary examination than head-outward rotation.

CONCLUSIONS

The cervical status after neck sprains in frontal and rear-end car impacts is very similar, and the cervical range of movement in different directions and increased pain during cervical motions do not reveal any specific isolated injury mechanisms. Combined injury mechanisms should be considered, and further studies are recommended to investigate asymmetric loading during impact.

摘要

目的

比较正面和追尾汽车碰撞后颈椎扭伤的颈椎状况,探讨先前提出的颈椎扭伤损伤机制、碰撞时头部旋转以及安全带几何形状的影响。

方法

基于 23 名正面碰撞和 108 名追尾碰撞的汽车乘员进行了前瞻性、多学科、深入的研究。在急性期以及 3 个月和 12 个月后,测量颈椎在牵引-回缩、屈伸、左右侧屈和左右旋转方向的主动活动度。记录每个运动的最大范围、疼痛增加和疼痛水平。对于向碰撞方向运动时疼痛增加但相反方向不增加的亚组(所谓的孤立对向性疼痛,ICP)进行进一步分析。在另一个亚组中研究侧屈和旋转活动度,其中头部相对于汽车向内或向外旋转,即远离或朝向安全带的对角线部分。

结果

与正面碰撞相比,追尾碰撞更常导致颈椎活动度受限,且在记录测量的三个不同时间点更常引起疼痛增加,但除少数例外,每个运动的差异均无统计学意义。追尾碰撞后更常观察到伸展时疼痛增加。追尾碰撞后,前/后缩时 ICP 也更常见。追尾碰撞时头部向内旋转比头部向外旋转在初次检查时更易导致同一方向的活动度受限。

结论

正面和追尾汽车碰撞后颈椎扭伤的颈椎状况非常相似,颈椎在不同方向的活动度和颈椎运动时疼痛增加并没有揭示任何特定的孤立损伤机制。应考虑综合损伤机制,并建议进一步研究以调查碰撞时的不对称加载。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验