Suppr超能文献

在临床环境中使用一种简单方法测量颈椎矢状面平移活动度的可靠性。

Reliability of measuring the cervical sagittal translation mobility with a simple method in a clinical setting.

作者信息

Severinsson Yvonne, Elisson Lena, Bunketorp Olle

机构信息

Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Rehabil Res Pract. 2012;2012:629104. doi: 10.1155/2012/629104. Epub 2012 Nov 4.

Abstract

Introduction. The cervical sagittal translation mobility is related to neck pain. A practical method for measuring the specific cervical mobility is needed. The aim was to describe a simple method for measuring the cervical sagittal translation mobility and to evaluate its reliability in a clinical setting. Method. The head protraction and retraction ranges of thirty healthy seated subjects were measured from a dorsal reference plane by two physiotherapists utilizing a tape measure. A standard inclinometer/goniometer was used to minimize angular movements of the head during the translational movements. The measurements were made twice for each subject with a two-hours interval between each measurement. The inter-rater and intra-rater agreements were evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and with the distribution of the difference of the measurements. The systematic differences were analysed with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results. The intra-rater agreement was good. The inter-rater agreement was moderate in the first measurement and good in the second. A systematic difference was noted between raters in the first measurement but not in the second, possibly indicating a learning effect. Discussion. The method used in the study is simple and reliable and can be recommended for clinical use.

摘要

引言。颈椎矢状面平移活动度与颈部疼痛相关。需要一种测量特定颈椎活动度的实用方法。目的是描述一种测量颈椎矢状面平移活动度的简单方法,并评估其在临床环境中的可靠性。方法。由两名物理治疗师使用卷尺从背部参考平面测量30名健康坐位受试者的头部前伸和后缩范围。使用标准倾斜仪/角度计以尽量减少平移运动期间头部的角运动。对每个受试者进行两次测量,每次测量间隔两小时。采用组内相关系数(ICC)和测量差异分布评估评分者间和评分者内的一致性。用Wilcoxon符号秩检验分析系统差异。结果。评分者内一致性良好。评分者间一致性在第一次测量时为中等,在第二次测量时为良好。在第一次测量时评分者之间存在系统差异,而在第二次测量时没有,这可能表明存在学习效应。讨论。本研究中使用的方法简单可靠,可推荐用于临床。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bce/3503439/84ef88b7d767/RERP2012-629104.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验