Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2011 Aug;21(4):616-22. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2011.05.025. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
Neurophysiological recordings in the cerebellar cortex of awake-behaving animals are revolutionizing the way we think about the role of Purkinje cells in sensori-motor calibration. Early theorists suggested that if a movement became miscalibrated, Purkinje cell output would be changed to adjust the motor command and restore good performance. The finding that Purkinje cell activity changed in many sensori-motor calibration tasks was taken as strong support for this hypothesis. Based on more recent data, however, it has been suggested that changes in Purkinje cell activity do not contribute to the motor command directly; instead, they are used either as a teaching signal, or to predict the altered kinematics of the movement after calibration has taken place. I will argue that these roles are not mutually exclusive, and that Purkinje cells may contribute to command generation, teaching, and prediction at different times during sensori-motor calibration.
在清醒动物的小脑皮层进行神经生理学记录正在彻底改变我们对浦肯野细胞在感觉运动校准中的作用的看法。早期的理论家认为,如果运动出现校准错误,浦肯野细胞的输出将会改变,以调整运动指令并恢复良好的性能。在许多感觉运动校准任务中发现浦肯野细胞活动发生变化,这被视为对该假说的有力支持。然而,基于最近的数据,有人认为浦肯野细胞活动的变化不会直接影响运动指令;相反,它们被用作教学信号,或者用于预测校准后运动的运动学变化。我将认为这些作用并不相互排斥,浦肯野细胞可能在感觉运动校准的不同时间对命令生成、教学和预测做出贡献。