• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

这完全是名称的问题,还是另有原因?标签对健康状况值的影响。

It's all in the name, or is it? The impact of labeling on health state values.

机构信息

Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, UK (DR, JB, AT, TY)

Department of Economics, University of Sheffield, UK (AT)

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2012 Jan-Feb;32(1):31-40. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11408435. Epub 2011 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X11408435
PMID:21685376
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many descriptions of health used in vignettes and condition-specific measures name the medical condition. This article assesses the impact of referring to the medical condition in the descriptions of health states valued by members of the general population.

METHODS

A valuation study was conducted using face-to-face interviews involving the time trade-off valuation technique. All respondents valued essentially the same health states, but for each respondent, the descriptions featured an irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) label, a cancer label, or no label. Random effects generalized least squares regressions were used to estimate the impact of each label and experience of the condition on health state values.

DATA

A sample of 241 members of the UK general population each valued 8 states, generating 1910 observations (response rate = 39%, completion rate = 99% for all states).

RESULTS

The authors find no significant difference between health state values when the description contains no label or an IBS label. They find that the inclusion of a cancer label in health state descriptions affects health state values and that the impact is dependent on the severity of the state, with a significant reduction in values for more severe health states (up to -0.25 for the worst possible state) but no significant difference for mild states.

CONCLUSIONS

A condition label can affect health state values, but this is dependent on the specific condition and severity. The authors recommend avoiding condition labels in health state descriptions (where possible) to ensure that values are not affected by prior knowledge or preconception of the condition that may distort the health state being valued.

摘要

背景

在病例描述和特定疾病的测量中使用的许多健康描述都提到了医学疾病。本文评估了在一般人群成员评估的健康状态描述中提及医疗条件对健康状态价值的影响。

方法

使用涉及时间权衡评估技术的面对面访谈进行了一项评估研究。所有受访者都对基本相同的健康状态进行了评估,但对于每个受访者,描述都有肠易激综合征(IBS)标签、癌症标签或没有标签。随机效应广义最小二乘法回归用于估计每个标签和疾病经历对健康状态价值的影响。

数据

英国普通人群的样本中的 241 名成员每人评估了 8 个状态,共产生了 1910 个观察值(响应率=39%,所有状态的完成率=99%)。

结果

作者发现当描述中没有标签或有 IBS 标签时,健康状态值之间没有显著差异。他们发现,在健康状态描述中包含癌症标签会影响健康状态值,并且影响取决于状态的严重程度,对于更严重的健康状态,价值显著降低(对于最差的状态可达-0.25),但对于轻度状态则没有显著差异。

结论

疾病标签可能会影响健康状态值,但这取决于具体疾病和严重程度。作者建议在健康状态描述中避免使用疾病标签(在可能的情况下),以确保不受可能扭曲正在评估的健康状态的条件的先验知识或偏见的影响。

相似文献

1
It's all in the name, or is it? The impact of labeling on health state values.这完全是名称的问题,还是另有原因?标签对健康状况值的影响。
Med Decis Making. 2012 Jan-Feb;32(1):31-40. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11408435. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
2
"Naming and Framing": The Impact of Labeling on Health State Values for Multiple Sclerosis.“命名与框架构建”:标签对多发性硬化症健康状态价值的影响
Med Decis Making. 2017 Aug;37(6):703-714. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17705637. Epub 2017 May 21.
3
Valuing Health Using Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiment Methods: Does Dimension Order Impact on Health State Values?使用时间权衡法和离散选择实验法评估健康:维度顺序会影响健康状态值吗?
Value Health. 2016 Mar-Apr;19(2):210-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.11.005. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
4
Learning effects in time trade-off based valuation of EQ-5D health states.基于时间权衡法的 EQ-5D 健康状态估值中的学习效应。
Value Health. 2012 Mar-Apr;15(2):340-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.10.010. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
5
Comparison of general population, patient, and carer utility values for dementia health states.痴呆健康状态下普通人群、患者及照料者效用值的比较。
Med Decis Making. 2015 Jan;35(1):68-80. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14557178. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
6
An Empirical Study of Two Alternative Comparators for Use in Time Trade-Off Studies.用于时间权衡研究的两种替代比较器的实证研究。
Value Health. 2016 Jan;19(1):53-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.10.012. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
7
The effect of time of onset on community preferences for health states: an exploratory study.发病时间对社区健康状态偏好的影响:一项探索性研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 Jan 20;9:6. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-6.
8
Valuation of EQ-5D health states in Poland: first TTO-based social value set in Central and Eastern Europe.波兰的 EQ-5D 健康状态评估:中东欧首个基于 TTO 的社会价值集。
Value Health. 2010 Mar-Apr;13(2):289-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00596.x. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
9
Estimation and comparison of EQ-5D health states' utility weights for pneumococcal and human papillomavirus diseases in Argentina, Chile, and the United Kingdom.评估和比较阿根廷、智利和英国的肺炎球菌病和人乳头瘤病毒病的 EQ-5D 健康状况效用权重。
Value Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;14(5 Suppl 1):S60-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.05.007.
10
The impact of social and psychological consequences of disease on judgments of disease severity: An experimental study.疾病的社会和心理后果对疾病严重程度判断的影响:一项实验研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 17;13(4):e0195338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195338. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Health state utilities associated with X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP).与X连锁视网膜色素变性(XLRP)相关的健康状态效用值。
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Mar 17. doi: 10.1007/s10198-025-01761-y.
2
One or many labels? a longitudinal qualitative study of patients' journey to diagnosis at a specialist NHS Postural Tachycardia Syndrome (PoTS) clinic.一个或多个标签?一项纵向定性研究,探讨患者在 NHS 体位性心动过速综合征(PoTS)专科诊所就诊的诊断过程。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 10;19(7):e0302723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302723. eCollection 2024.
3
Health state utility values for metastatic pancreatic cancer using a composite time trade-off based on the vignette-based approach in Japan.
基于日本 vignette 法的复合时间权衡法得出的转移性胰腺癌的健康状态效用值。
Health Econ Rev. 2022 Dec 24;12(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13561-022-00413-8.
4
The FACT-8D, a new cancer-specific utility algorithm based on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapies-General (FACT-G): a Canadian valuation study.FACT-8D,一种新的基于癌症治疗功能评估一般量表(FACT-G)的癌症专用效用算法:一项加拿大评估研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Jun 16;20(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-02002-z.
5
Adolescent valuation of CARIES-QC-U: a child-centred preference-based measure of dental caries.青少年对 CARIES-QC-U 的评估:一种以儿童为中心的基于偏好的龋齿测量方法。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Feb 3;20(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01918-w.
6
Valuing child and adolescent health: a qualitative study on different perspectives and priorities taken by the adult general public.重视儿童和青少年健康:一项关于普通成年人群不同观点和优先事项的定性研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Sep 23;19(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01858-x.
7
Proxy responses to ICECAP-A: Exploring variation across multiple proxy assessments of capability well-being for the same individuals.针对 ICECAP-A 的代理反应:探索同一人群的多个代理能力幸福感评估之间的差异。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 28;15(7):e0236584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236584. eCollection 2020.
8
Valuing the AD-5D Dementia Utility Instrument: An Estimation of a General Population Tariff.重视 AD-5D 痴呆效用量表:一般人群关税的估算。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Aug;38(8):871-881. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00913-7.
9
Comparison of health state utility estimates from instrument-based and vignette-based methods: a case study in kidney disease.基于工具法和基于 vignette 法的健康状态效用估计值比较:以肾脏疾病为例的研究
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Jul 8;12(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4413-y.
10
Health state utilities associated with attributes of migraine preventive treatments based on patient and general population preferences.基于患者和一般人群偏好的偏头痛预防治疗属性相关的健康状态效用。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Sep;28(9):2359-2372. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02163-3. Epub 2019 Mar 28.