Department of Endodontics, New Jersey Dental School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, NJ 07101-1709, USA.
J Endod. 2011 Jul;37(7):919-21. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.027. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
Digital radiographic imaging systems have undergone tremendous improvements since their introduction. Advantages of digital radiographs over conventional films include lower radiation doses compared with conventional films, instantaneous images, archiving and sharing images easily, and manipulation of several radiographic properties that might help in diagnosis.
A total of 6 observers including 2 endodontic residents, 3 endodontists, and 1 oral radiologist evaluated 150 molar digital periapical radiographs to determine which of the following conditions existed: normal periapical tissue, widened periodontal ligament, or presence of periapical radiolucency. The evaluators had full control over the radiograph's parameters of the Planmeca Dimaxis software program. All images were viewed on the same computer monitor with ideal vie-wing conditions. The same 6 observers evaluated the same 150 digital images 3 months later. The data were analyzed to determine how well the evaluators agreed with each other (interobserver agreement) for 2 rounds of observations and with themselves (intraobserver agreement).
Fleiss kappa statistical analysis was used to measure the level of agreement among multiple raters. The overall Fleiss kappa value for interobserver agreement for the first round of interpretation was 0.34 (P < .001). The overall Fleiss kappa value for interobserver agreement for the second round of interpretation was 0.35 (P < .001). This resulted in fair (0.2-0.4) agreement among the 6 raters at both observation periods. A weighted kappa analysis was used to determine intraobserver agreement, which showed on average a moderate agreement.
The results indicate that the interpretation of a dental radiograph is subjective, irrespective of whether conventional or digital radiographs are used. The factors that appeared to have the most impact were the years of experience of the examiner and familiarity of the operator with a given digital system.
自问世以来,数字射线成像系统已经取得了巨大的进步。与传统胶片相比,数字射线照片具有以下优点:与传统胶片相比,辐射剂量更低、可即时成像、易于归档和共享图像、以及可对多个可能有助于诊断的射线照相特性进行处理。
共有 6 名观察者(包括 2 名牙髓病学住院医师、3 名牙髓病学家和 1 名口腔放射学家)评估了 150 张磨牙数字化根尖周射线照片,以确定以下哪种情况存在:正常根尖周组织、牙周韧带增宽或根尖周放射透亮区。评估者可以完全控制 Planmeca Dimaxis 软件程序的射线照片参数。所有图像均在相同的计算机监视器上查看,具有理想的观看条件。同 6 名观察者在 3 个月后评估相同的 150 张数字图像。对数据进行了分析,以确定评估者在两轮观察中彼此之间(观察者间一致性)以及他们自己(观察者内一致性)的一致性程度。
使用 Fleiss kappa 统计分析来衡量多位评估者之间的一致性程度。第一轮解释的观察者间总体 Fleiss kappa 值为 0.34(P<.001)。第二轮解释的观察者间总体 Fleiss kappa 值为 0.35(P<.001)。这导致在两轮观察中,6 名评估者的一致性为中等(0.2-0.4)。使用加权 kappa 分析来确定观察者内一致性,结果显示平均为中度一致。
结果表明,无论使用传统射线照片还是数字射线照片,射线照片的解释都是主观的。似乎对评估结果影响最大的因素是检查者的工作经验年限和操作者对特定数字系统的熟悉程度。