Great Lakes WATER Institute, UW-Milwaukee, 600 E. Greenfield Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53204, USA.
Water Res. 2011 Aug;45(14):4081-91. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.04.049. Epub 2011 May 10.
Human sewage contamination of surface waters is a major human health concern. We found urban stormwater systems that collect and convey runoff from impervious surfaces act as a conduit for sewage originating from breeches in sanitary sewer infrastructure. A total of 828 samples at 45 stormwater outfalls were collected over a four-year period and assessed by culture based methods, PCR, and quantitative PCR (qPCR) to test for traditional and alternative indicators of fecal pollution. All outfalls had the HF183 (human) Bacteroides genetic marker detected in at least one sample, suggesting sewage contamination is nearly ubiquitous in the urban environment. However, most outfalls were intermittently positive, ranging from detection in 11%-100% of the samples. Positive results did not correlate with seasonality, rainfall amounts, or days since previous rainfall. Approximately two-thirds of the outfalls had high (>5000 copy number, i.e. CN, per 100 ml) or moderate levels (1000-5000 CN per 100 ml) of the human Bacteroides genetic marker. Escherichia coli (E. coli) and enterococci levels did not correlate to human Bacteroides. A total of 66% of all outfall samples had standard fecal indicator levels above 10,000 CFU per 100 ml. A tiered assessment using this benchmark to identify high priority sites would have failed to flag 35% of the samples that had evidence of sewage contamination. In addition, high fecal indicators would have flagged 33% of samples as priority that had low or no evidence of sewage. Enteric virus levels in one outfall with high levels of the human Bacteroides genetic marker were similar to untreated wastewater, which illustrates stormwater can serve as a pathway for pathogen contamination. The major source of fecal pollution at four of five river sites that receive stormwater discharge appeared to be from sewage sources rather than non-human sources based on the ratios of human Bacteroides to total Bacteroides spp. This study shows the feasibility and benefits of employing molecular methods to test for alternative indicators of fecal pollution to identify sewage sources and potential health risks and for prioritization of remediation efforts.
人类污水污染地表水是一个主要的人类健康问题。我们发现,收集和输送不透水表面径流的城市雨水系统是卫生污水基础设施破裂处产生的污水的渠道。在四年的时间里,我们在 45 个雨水出水口收集了 828 个样本,并通过基于培养的方法、PCR 和定量 PCR(qPCR)进行评估,以测试传统和替代粪便污染指标。所有出水口都至少在一个样本中检测到 HF183(人类)拟杆菌遗传标记,这表明污水污染在城市环境中几乎无处不在。然而,大多数出水口都是间歇性阳性的,从 11%到 100%的样本都有阳性结果。阳性结果与季节性、降雨量或上次降雨后的天数无关。大约三分之二的出水口的人类拟杆菌遗传标记数量较高(每 100 毫升超过 5000 个拷贝数,即 CN)或中等水平(每 100 毫升 1000-5000 CN)。大肠杆菌(E. coli)和肠球菌水平与人类拟杆菌无关。总共 66%的出水口样本的标准粪便指示物水平超过每 100 毫升 10000 CFU。使用这一基准进行分层评估来确定高优先级地点的方法将无法标记 35%的有污水污染证据的样本。此外,高粪便指示物将标记 33%的低或无污水证据的样本为优先级。一个出水口的人类拟杆菌遗传标记水平较高,肠病毒水平与未经处理的废水相似,这说明了雨水系统可以成为病原体污染的途径。五个接受雨水排放的河流地点中的四个地点的主要粪便污染源似乎来自污水源,而不是非人类源,这是基于人类拟杆菌与总拟杆菌 spp 的比值。本研究表明,采用分子方法测试替代粪便污染指标来识别污水源和潜在健康风险,并对修复工作进行优先级排序是可行的,也是有益的。