Phelan Shanon K
Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Field of Occupational Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, 1201 Western Rd., London, ON N6G 1H1.
Can J Occup Ther. 2011 Jun;78(3):164-72. doi: 10.2182/cjot.2011.78.3.4.
Within professional and practice knowledge there are many assumptions about disability that underpin occupational therapy philosophy.
The objectives of this paper are to (a) critically examine how disability has been constructed in mainstream society by introducing perspectives from contemporary disability studies theories, and (b) apply a critically reflexive lens informed by disability studies perspectives to occupational therapy practice.
Drawing upon critical disability perspectives, notions of "nondisabled" versus "disabled"; metanarratives of disability; built environments and social structures; and social and attitudinal constructions of disability and identity are examined. Key issues pertaining to rehabilitation, norms, client-centred practice, language, and education within occupational therapy are discussed.
This critically reflexive examination has revealed the ways in which occupational therapy and society at large are embedded in discourses that may reinforce negative connotations around disability. A renewed understanding of disability may challenge current practices.
在专业知识和实践知识中,存在许多关于残疾的假设,这些假设构成了职业治疗理念的基础。
本文的目标是:(a)通过引入当代残疾研究理论的观点,批判性地审视主流社会中残疾是如何被建构的;(b)运用由残疾研究观点所启发的批判性反思视角,审视职业治疗实践。
借鉴批判性残疾视角,审视“非残疾”与“残疾”的概念;残疾的元叙事;建筑环境与社会结构;以及残疾与身份的社会和态度建构。讨论了职业治疗中与康复、规范、以客户为中心的实践、语言和教育相关的关键问题。
这种批判性反思审视揭示了职业治疗和整个社会是如何深陷于可能强化围绕残疾的负面含义的话语之中的。对残疾的重新理解可能会挑战当前的实践。