Fleming-Castaldy Rita P
Professor, Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Scranton, Scranton, PA.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Jul;106(3):340-351. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.332. Epub 2018 Jul 1.
The study examined the efficacy of an interprofessional information and historical literacy project implemented by an occupational therapy educator and a librarian.
A graduate course was revised to include information and historical literacy objectives and instruction. A course-specific questionnaire administered on the first and last day of class, assignment grades, and course evaluations provided measures of project outcomes for six years. Differences between questionnaire pre- and post-test means were determined using -tests. Course evaluation comments were analyzed to obtain qualitative perceptions.
A significant difference (<0.0001) was found between pre-test (M=3.93, SD=0.48) and post-test (M=4.67, SD=0.30) scores of total information and historical literacy competence across all years (n=242). Responses to individual items also differed significantly (<0.0001). Student ratings (n=189) from the course evaluation historical literacy objectives were high (M=4.6 on a 5-point scale). Assignment quality and grades improved, and course evaluation comments reflected student satisfaction.
The findings supported the hypothesis that students' self-reported information and historical literacy competencies would increase after project participation. Acquired skills were evident in students' assignments. Research to determine if these capabilities were used post-graduation is needed. Because this was a course-specific project, findings are not generalizable; however, the instructional methods developed for this project can serve as a model for effective interprofessional collaboration. The broadening of information literacy instruction to include discipline-specific historical literacy provides a unique opportunity for health sciences librarians and educators. Developing students' historical literacy in their chosen fields can help them understand their profession's present status and be informed participants in shaping its future.
本研究考察了由一名职业治疗教育工作者和一名图书馆员实施的跨专业信息与历史素养项目的效果。
对一门研究生课程进行修订,纳入信息与历史素养目标及教学内容。在课程的第一天和最后一天发放特定课程问卷、作业成绩及课程评估,提供了六年的项目成果衡量指标。使用t检验确定问卷前后测均值之间的差异。对课程评估意见进行分析以获得定性看法。
在所有年份(n = 242)中,信息与历史素养总能力的前测(M = 3.93,SD = 0.48)和后测(M = 4.67,SD = 0.30)得分之间存在显著差异(<0.0001)。对各个项目的回答也存在显著差异(<0.0001)。课程评估中关于历史素养目标的学生评分(n = 189)很高(5分制下M = 4.6)。作业质量和成绩有所提高,课程评估意见反映了学生的满意度。
研究结果支持了这样的假设,即学生参与项目后自我报告的信息与历史素养能力会有所提高。学生作业中明显体现了所获得的技能。需要开展研究以确定这些能力在毕业后是否会被运用。由于这是一个特定课程项目,研究结果不可推广;然而,为该项目开发的教学方法可作为有效的跨专业合作典范。将信息素养教学扩展到包括特定学科的历史素养,为健康科学图书馆员和教育工作者提供了独特机会。培养学生在所选领域的历史素养有助于他们了解本专业的现状,并成为塑造其未来的明智参与者。