• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神科患者的人格病理学中心领域。

The central domains of personality pathology in psychiatric patients.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Pers Disord. 2011 Jun;25(3):364-77. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2011.25.3.364.

DOI:10.1521/pedi.2011.25.3.364
PMID:21699397
Abstract

There is general agreement that the classification of personality disorders in DSM-IV is unsatisfactory. We systematically reviewed all studies that have analyzed patterns of personality disorder symptoms and signs in psychiatric patients; twenty-two papers were included in the final synthesis. There is reasonable consistency over the number and type of personality pathology traits reported despite differing samples, varying assessment methods, and different statistical manipulations. There are three or four high order traits; an externalizing factor incorporating borderline, narcissistic, histrionic, and antisocial traits (the latter is sometimes recorded as a separate trait); an internalizing factor incorporating avoidant and dependent traits; a schizoid factor; and often a compulsive factor. Using these domains of personality pathology would simplify classification, have higher clinical utility, and allow relatively easy translation of current research.

摘要

普遍认为,DSM-IV 中的人格障碍分类并不令人满意。我们系统地回顾了所有分析精神病人人格障碍症状和体征模式的研究;最终综合分析包括 22 篇论文。尽管样本不同、评估方法不同、统计处理方法不同,但所报告的人格病理特征的数量和类型具有相当的一致性。有三四个高阶特质;一个外显因素包含边缘型、自恋型、表演型和反社会型特质(后者有时被记录为一个单独的特质);一个内隐因素包含回避型和依赖型特质;一个分裂型特质;通常还有一个强迫型特质。使用这些人格病理领域将简化分类,具有更高的临床实用性,并允许当前研究相对容易地转化。

相似文献

1
The central domains of personality pathology in psychiatric patients.精神科患者的人格病理学中心领域。
J Pers Disord. 2011 Jun;25(3):364-77. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2011.25.3.364.
2
Integrating normal and abnormal personality structure: a proposal for DSM-V.整合正常和异常人格结构:DSM-V 的建议。
J Pers Disord. 2011 Jun;25(3):338-63. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2011.25.3.338.
3
Factor structure of self-reported clinical disorders and personality disorders: a review of the existing literature and a factor analytical study.自报告临床障碍和人格障碍的因子结构:现有文献综述和因子分析研究。
J Clin Psychol. 2012 Jun;68(6):645-60. doi: 10.1002/jclp.21841. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
4
[Personality disorders in a nonclinical sample of adolescents].[青少年非临床样本中的人格障碍]
Encephale. 2002 Nov-Dec;28(6 Pt 1):520-4.
5
The relationship between the MCMI personality scales and DSM-III, axis II.米隆临床多轴问卷(MCMI)人格量表与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)轴II之间的关系。
J Pers Assess. 1990 Winter;55(3-4):698-707. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674105.
6
The Five-Factor Model of personality disorder and DSM-5.人格障碍的五因素模型与 DSM-5
J Pers. 2012 Dec;80(6):1697-720. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00771.x.
7
Personality assessment in DSM-5: empirical support for rating severity, style, and traits.DSM-5 中的人格评估:对严重程度、风格和特质进行评分的实证支持。
J Pers Disord. 2011 Jun;25(3):305-20. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2011.25.3.305.
8
A five-factor model perspective on psychopathy and comorbid Axis-II disorders in a forensic-psychiatric sample.从五因素模型角度看法医精神病学样本中的精神病态与共病的轴II障碍
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2008 Oct-Nov;31(5):394-406. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2008.08.008. Epub 2008 Sep 13.
9
The structure of axis II disorders in adolescents: a cluster- and factor-analytic investigation of DSM-IV categories and criteria.青少年轴II障碍的结构:对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版类别及标准的聚类分析和因素分析研究
J Pers Disord. 2005 Aug;19(4):440-61. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2005.19.4.440.
10
Maladaptively high and low openness: the case for experiential permeability.适应不良的高和低开放性:经验渗透性的案例。
J Pers. 2012 Dec;80(6):1641-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00777.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The new ICD-11 diagnosis of personality disorder in forensic psychiatry.法医精神病学中人格障碍的国际疾病分类第11版新诊断标准
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 19;16:1630512. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1630512. eCollection 2025.
2
Association of Intronic C>T Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (rs782440) with Borderline Personality Disorder: A Case-Control Study.内含子C>T单核苷酸多态性(rs782440)与边缘型人格障碍的关联:一项病例对照研究。
Cell J. 2023 Nov 28;25(11):783-789. doi: 10.22074/cellj.2023.2004323.1321.
3
ICD-11 Personality Disorders: Utility and Implications of the New Model.
《国际疾病分类第11版》中的人格障碍:新模式的效用与影响
Front Psychiatry. 2021 May 10;12:655548. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.655548. eCollection 2021.
4
The Utility of ICD-11 and DSM-5 Traits for Differentiating Patients With Personality Disorders From Other Clinical Groups.国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM - 5)人格特质在区分人格障碍患者与其他临床群体中的效用
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 16;12:633882. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.633882. eCollection 2021.
5
Integration of the and Dimensional Systems for Personality Disorders Into a Unified Taxonomy With Non-overlapping Traits.将人格障碍的[具体两个维度系统名称未给出]维度系统整合为具有非重叠特质的统一分类法。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 6;12:591934. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.591934. eCollection 2021.
6
The case for cautious paternalism in the emergency management of patients with borderline personality disorder.边缘型人格障碍患者应急管理中谨慎家长主义的情况
BJPsych Bull. 2021 Apr;45(2):86-89. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2020.148.
7
Personality Disorders in the ICD-11: Spanish Validation of the PiCD and the SASPD in a Mixed Community and Clinical Sample.《国际疾病分类第11版》中的人格障碍:PiCD和SASPD在混合社区与临床样本中的西班牙语验证
Assessment. 2021 Apr;28(3):759-772. doi: 10.1177/1073191120936357. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
8
Symptom-level analysis of DSM-IV/DSM-5 personality pathology in later life: Hierarchical structure and predictive validity across self- and informant ratings.晚年 DSM-IV/DSM-5 人格病理学的症状水平分析:自我和知情者评定的层次结构和预测效度。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2019 Jul;128(5):365-384. doi: 10.1037/abn0000444.
9
A Life Span Perspective on Borderline Personality Disorder.从生命全程视角看边缘型人格障碍。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Jun 4;21(7):51. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1040-1.
10
Evaluating the assessment of the ICD-11 personality disorder diagnostic system.评估 ICD-11 人格障碍诊断系统的评估。
Psychol Assess. 2019 May;31(5):674-684. doi: 10.1037/pas0000693. Epub 2019 Jan 10.