• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《国际疾病分类第11版》中的人格障碍:PiCD和SASPD在混合社区与临床样本中的西班牙语验证

Personality Disorders in the ICD-11: Spanish Validation of the PiCD and the SASPD in a Mixed Community and Clinical Sample.

作者信息

Gutiérrez Fernando, Aluja Anton, Ruiz José, García Luis F, Gárriz Miguel, Gutiérrez-Zotes Alfonso, Gallardo-Pujol David, Navarro-Haro Maria V, Alabèrnia-Segura Miquel, Mestre-Pintó Joan Ignasi, Torrens Marta, Peri Josep M, Sureda Bárbara, Soler Joaquim, Pascual Juan Carlos, Vall Gemma, Calvo Natalia, Ferrer Marc, Oltmanns Joshua R, Widiger Thomas A

机构信息

Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.

IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Assessment. 2021 Apr;28(3):759-772. doi: 10.1177/1073191120936357. Epub 2020 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1177/1073191120936357
PMID:32583685
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7961637/
Abstract

The International Classification of Diseases-11th revision (ICD-11) classification of personality disorders is the official diagnostic system that is used all over the world, and it has recently been renewed. However, as yet very few data are available on its performance. This study examines the Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD), which assesses the personality domains of the system, and the Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SASPD), which determines severity. The Spanish versions of the questionnaires were administered to a community ( = 2,522) and a clinical sample ( = 797). Internal consistency was adequate in the PiCD (α = .75 to .84) but less so in the SASPD (α = .64 and .73). Factor analyses suggested a unidimensional or bidimensional structure for severity, while revealing that the personality trait qualifiers are organized into four factors: negative affectivity, detachment, dissociality, and a bipolar domain of disinhibition-anankastia. The mutual relationships between traits and severity were analyzed, as well as the ability of the whole system to identify clinical subjects. Although further improvements are required, the results generally support the use of the PiCD and the SASPD and help substantiate the new ICD-11 taxonomy that underlies them.

摘要

《国际疾病分类第11次修订版》(ICD - 11)的人格障碍分类是全球通用的官方诊断系统,且最近进行了更新。然而,目前关于其性能的数据还非常少。本研究考察了用于评估该系统人格领域的《ICD - 11人格量表》(PiCD)以及用于确定严重程度的《人格障碍严重程度标准化评估》(SASPD)。对一个社区样本(n = 2522)和一个临床样本(n = 797)施测了问卷的西班牙语版本。PiCD的内部一致性良好(α = 0.75至0.84),而SASPD的内部一致性稍差(α = 0.64和0.73)。因素分析表明严重程度呈单维或二维结构,同时揭示人格特质限定词被组织为四个因素:消极情感性、超脱、反社会性以及一个由抑制障碍 - 强迫性构成的双极领域。分析了特质与严重程度之间的相互关系,以及整个系统识别临床受试者的能力。尽管仍需进一步改进,但结果总体上支持PiCD和SASPD的使用,并有助于证实作为其基础的新ICD - 11分类法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6577/7961637/d0d781d979b7/10.1177_1073191120936357-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6577/7961637/d0d781d979b7/10.1177_1073191120936357-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6577/7961637/d0d781d979b7/10.1177_1073191120936357-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Personality Disorders in the ICD-11: Spanish Validation of the PiCD and the SASPD in a Mixed Community and Clinical Sample.《国际疾病分类第11版》中的人格障碍:PiCD和SASPD在混合社区与临床样本中的西班牙语验证
Assessment. 2021 Apr;28(3):759-772. doi: 10.1177/1073191120936357. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
2
Six-month stability and predictive validity of the personality inventory for ICD-11.《ICD-11 人格量表的六个月稳定性和预测效度》。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Nov 16;10(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00979-2.
3
The Personality Inventory for ICD-11: Investigating reliability, structural and concurrent validity, and method variance.《ICD-11 人格量表:信度、结构和同时效度以及方法偏差的研究》
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):8-17. doi: 10.1037/pas0000776. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
4
Assessment of personality disorder in the ICD-11 diagnostic system: Polish validation of the Personality Inventory for ICD-11.《ICD-11 诊断系统中人格障碍的评估:ICD-11 人格量表的波兰验证》
Psychiatr Pol. 2022 Dec 31;56(6):1185-1202. doi: 10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/138563.
5
Structure of clinician-reported ICD-11 personality disorder trait qualifiers.临床医生报告的 ICD-11 人格障碍特质修饰语的结构。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):50-59. doi: 10.1037/pas0000747. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
6
[The Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD): Reliability and Validity of the German Version in a Clinical and Non-Clinical Sample].[国际疾病分类第11版人格量表(PiCD):德文版在临床和非临床样本中的信度和效度]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2023 Feb;73(2):62-69. doi: 10.1055/a-1826-1888. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
7
Reliability and construct validity of the Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD) in Italian adult participants.《国际疾病分类第 11 版人格障碍检查表(PiCD)》在意大利成年参与者中的信度和构念效度。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):29-39. doi: 10.1037/pas0000766. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
8
Alignment of the personality inventory for ICD-11 with the five-factor model of personality.与人格五因素模型的 ICD-11 人格量表的对齐。
Psychol Assess. 2022 Jul;34(7):711-716. doi: 10.1037/pas0001141. Epub 2022 May 5.
9
ICD-11 and DSM-5 personality trait domains capture categorical personality disorders: Finding a common ground.《ICD-11 和 DSM-5 人格特质领域能否涵盖类别性人格障碍:寻找共同点》
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2018 May;52(5):425-434. doi: 10.1177/0004867417727867. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
10
Application of the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders.人格障碍 ICD-11 分类的应用。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 29;18(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1908-3.

引用本文的文献

1
The new ICD-11 diagnosis of personality disorder in forensic psychiatry.法医精神病学中人格障碍的国际疾病分类第11版新诊断标准
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 19;16:1630512. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1630512. eCollection 2025.
2
Perceptions of Adulthood and Mental Health.成年期认知与心理健康。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jun 14;21(6):773. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21060773.
3
Convergence of the dimensional assessment of personality pathology (DAPP-BQ) and the five-factor personality inventory for the international classification of diseases 11th edition (FFiCD) in the context of the five-factor model and personality disorders.

本文引用的文献

1
A psychometric evaluation of the Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SASPD) in nonclinical and clinical German samples.非临床和临床德国样本中人格障碍严重程度标准化评估量表(SASPD)的心理计量学评估。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Oct;32(10):984-990. doi: 10.1037/pas0000926. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
2
Prevalence and structure of self-other problems in SAPAS screening for personality disorder in a National Sample.在全国样本中,通过 SAPAS 筛查人格障碍时,自我-他人问题的普遍性和结构。
Personal Ment Health. 2020 May;14(2):175-185. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1470. Epub 2019 Nov 24.
3
Assessment of the ICD-11 dimensional trait model: An introduction to the special section.
在五因素模型和人格障碍的背景下,人格病理学的维度评估(DAPP-BQ)与国际疾病分类第 11 版的五因素人格量表(FFiCD)的趋同。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 May 21;24(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05835-8.
4
Practical implications of ICD-11 personality disorder classifications.ICD-11 人格障碍分类的实际影响。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 7;24(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05640-3.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of severity measures of ICD-11 and DSM-5 personality disorder: clarifying the clinical landscape with the most up-to-date evidence.《国际疾病分类第11版》(ICD - 11)和《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版》(DSM - 5)人格障碍严重程度测量的诊断准确性:用最新证据厘清临床现状
Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 30;14:1209679. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1209679. eCollection 2023.
6
Cross-walking personality disorder types to ICD-11 trait domains: An overview of current findings.将人格障碍类型与《国际疾病分类第11版》(ICD - 11)特质领域进行交叉对照:当前研究结果概述
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 6;14:1175425. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1175425. eCollection 2023.
7
Severity in the ICD-11 personality disorder model: Evaluation in a Spanish mixed sample.国际疾病分类第11版人格障碍模型中的严重程度:西班牙混合样本评估。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 9;13:1015489. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1015489. eCollection 2022.
8
Clinical Implications of ICD-11 for Diagnosing and Treating Personality Disorders.《ICD-11 对人格障碍诊断和治疗的临床意义》
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2022 Oct;24(10):553-563. doi: 10.1007/s11920-022-01364-x. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
9
The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Primary Care and the Role of Depression Severity and Treatment Attendance.基于正念的认知疗法在初级保健中的有效性以及抑郁严重程度和治疗依从性的作用。
Mindfulness (N Y). 2022;13(2):362-372. doi: 10.1007/s12671-021-01794-3. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
10
Editorial: Entering the Brave New World of ICD-11 Personality Disorder Diagnosis.社论:踏入国际疾病分类第11版人格障碍诊断的全新世界。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 17;12:793133. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.793133. eCollection 2021.
评估 ICD-11 维度特质模型:特刊介绍。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):1-7. doi: 10.1037/pas0000785. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
4
A comprehensive comparison of the ICD-11 and DSM-5 section III personality disorder models.ICD-11 与 DSM-5 第三部分人格障碍模型的全面比较。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):72-84. doi: 10.1037/pas0000772. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
5
The Personality Inventory for ICD-11: Investigating reliability, structural and concurrent validity, and method variance.《ICD-11 人格量表:信度、结构和同时效度以及方法偏差的研究》
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):8-17. doi: 10.1037/pas0000776. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
6
The Five-Factor Personality Inventory for ICD-11: A facet-level assessment of the ICD-11 trait model.《ICD-11 五因素人格量表》:对 ICD-11 特质模型的层面评估。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):60-71. doi: 10.1037/pas0000763. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
7
Reliability and construct validity of the Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD) in Italian adult participants.《国际疾病分类第 11 版人格障碍检查表(PiCD)》在意大利成年参与者中的信度和构念效度。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):29-39. doi: 10.1037/pas0000766. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
8
Structure of clinician-reported ICD-11 personality disorder trait qualifiers.临床医生报告的 ICD-11 人格障碍特质修饰语的结构。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):50-59. doi: 10.1037/pas0000747. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
9
The convergent, discriminant, and structural relationship of the DAPP-BQ and SNAP with the ICD-11, DSM-5, and FFM trait models.DAPP-BQ 和 SNAP 与 ICD-11、DSM-5 和 FFM 特质模型的会聚、区别和结构关系。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):18-28. doi: 10.1037/pas0000757. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
10
Toward an Integrated Model of Pathological Personality Traits: Common Hierarchical Structure of the PID-5 and the DAPP-BQ.迈向病理性人格特质的整合模型:人格障碍五因素问卷(PID-5)与人格障碍诊断替代模型问卷(DAPP-BQ)的共同层次结构
J Pers Disord. 2020 Dec;34(Supplement C):25-39. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2019_33_431. Epub 2019 Jun 18.