• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重边缘型和未特定型人格障碍患者的协作式护理:基于过程和结果的比较性多案例研究

Collaborative Care for patients with severe borderline and NOS personality disorders: a comparative multiple case study on processes and outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and EMGO institute, VU University Medical Center/GGZ inGeest, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Jun 24;11:102. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-102.

DOI:10.1186/1471-244X-11-102
PMID:21699740
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3135521/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Structured psychotherapy is recommended as the preferred treatment of personality disorders. A substantial group of patients, however, has no access to these therapies or does not benefit. For those patients who have no (longer) access to psychotherapy a Collaborative Care Program (CCP) is developed. Collaborative Care originated in somatic health care to increase shared decision making and to enhance self management skills of chronic patients. Nurses have a prominent position in CCP's as they are responsible for optimal continuity and coordination of care. The aim of the CCP is to improve quality of life and self management skills, and reduce destructive behaviour and other manifestations of the personality disorder.

METHODS/DESIGN: Quantitative and qualitative data are combined in a comparative multiple case study. This makes it possible to test the feasibility of the CCP, and also provides insight into the preliminary outcomes of CCP. Two treatment conditions will be compared, one in which the CCP is provided, the other in which Care as Usual is offered. In both conditions 16 patients will be included. The perspectives of patients, their informal carers and nurses are integrated in this study. Data (questionnaires, documents, and interviews) will be collected among these three groups of participants. The process of treatment and care within both research conditions is described with qualitative research methods. Additional quantitative data provide insight in the preliminary results of the CCP compared to CAU. With a stepped analysis plan the 'black box' of the application of the program will be revealed in order to understand which characteristics and influencing factors are indicative for positive or negative outcomes.

DISCUSSION

The present study is, as to the best of our knowledge, the first to examine Collaborative Care for patients with severe personality disorders receiving outpatient mental health care. With the chosen design we want to examine how and which elements of the CC Program could contribute to a better quality of life for the patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Register (NTR): NTR2763.

摘要

背景

结构性心理治疗被推荐为治疗人格障碍的首选方法。然而,相当一部分患者无法获得这些治疗或从中获益。对于那些无法(再)接受心理治疗的患者,开发了一种协作护理计划(CCP)。协作护理最初起源于躯体保健,旨在增加共同决策,并提高慢性患者的自我管理技能。护士在 CCP 中占有突出地位,因为他们负责最佳的连续性和护理协调。CCP 的目的是提高生活质量和自我管理技能,减少破坏性行为和人格障碍的其他表现。

方法/设计:定量和定性数据结合在一项比较性多案例研究中。这使得测试 CCP 的可行性成为可能,同时也提供了对 CCP 初步结果的洞察。将比较两种治疗条件,一种提供 CCP,另一种提供常规护理。在这两种情况下,将纳入 16 名患者。本研究整合了患者、他们的非正式照顾者和护士的观点。将从这三组参与者中收集数据(问卷、文件和访谈)。将使用定性研究方法描述两种研究条件下的治疗和护理过程。额外的定量数据提供了 CCP 与 CAU 相比的初步结果的见解。通过逐步分析计划,揭示程序应用的“黑箱”,以了解哪些特征和影响因素对积极或消极结果具有指示性。

讨论

就我们所知,目前的研究是首次检查协作护理对接受门诊心理健康护理的严重人格障碍患者的应用。通过选择的设计,我们希望研究 CCP 的哪些元素以及如何有助于改善患者的生活质量。

试验注册

荷兰试验注册处(NTR):NTR2763。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9e4/3135521/4dbb7e7539f0/1471-244X-11-102-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9e4/3135521/4dbb7e7539f0/1471-244X-11-102-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9e4/3135521/4dbb7e7539f0/1471-244X-11-102-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Collaborative Care for patients with severe borderline and NOS personality disorders: a comparative multiple case study on processes and outcomes.严重边缘型和未特定型人格障碍患者的协作式护理:基于过程和结果的比较性多案例研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Jun 24;11:102. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-102.
2
Collaborative care for patients with bipolar disorder: a randomised controlled trial.双相障碍患者的协作式护理:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Aug 17;11:133. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-133.
3
An intervention for parents with severe personality difficulties whose children have mental health problems: a feasibility RCT.一项针对有严重人格障碍且其子女有心理健康问题的父母的干预措施:一项可行性 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Mar;24(14):1-188. doi: 10.3310/hta24140.
4
Psychological Support for Personality (PSP) versus treatment as usual: study protocol for a feasibility randomized controlled trial of a low intensity intervention for people with personality disorder.人格心理支持(PSP)与常规治疗对比:一项针对人格障碍患者的低强度干预可行性随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Oct 10;19(1):547. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2920-0.
5
Collaborative Care for Patients With Severe Personality Disorders: Preliminary Results and Active Ingredients From a Pilot Study (Part I).严重人格障碍患者的协作护理:一项试点研究的初步结果及有效成分(第一部分)
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2015 Jul;51(3):180-9. doi: 10.1111/ppc.12079. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
6
Collaborative Care for Patients With Severe Personality Disorders: Analyzing the Execution Process in a Pilot Study (Part II).重度人格障碍患者的协作护理:一项试点研究中的执行过程分析(第二部分)
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2015 Jul;51(3):220-7. doi: 10.1111/ppc.12087. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
7
Psychoeducation with problem-solving (PEPS) therapy for adults with personality disorder: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial to determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a manualised intervention to improve social functioning.针对成人人格障碍患者的问题解决式心理教育(PEPS)疗法:一项实用随机对照试验,以确定一种标准化干预措施改善社会功能的临床疗效和成本效益。
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Jul;20(52):1-250. doi: 10.3310/hta20520.
8
Design of a multicentered randomized controlled trial on the clinical and cost effectiveness of schema therapy for personality disorders.多中心随机对照试验设计:图式疗法治疗人格障碍的临床与成本效益研究
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jan 24;12:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-75.
9
PRO*BPD: effectiveness of outpatient treatment programs for borderline personality disorder: a comparison of Schema therapy and dialectical behavior therapy: study protocol for a randomized trial.PRO*BPD:边缘型人格障碍门诊治疗项目的效果:图式治疗与辩证行为治疗的比较:一项随机试验研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 19;18(1):341. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1905-6.
10
COllaborative Shared care to IMprove Psychosis Outcome (COSIMPO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.协作共享护理改善精神病结局(COSIMPO):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Oct 10;18(1):462. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2187-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards collaborative care for severe and enduring Anorexia Nervosa - a mixed-method approach.迈向严重及持久性神经性厌食症的协作式照护——一种混合方法研究路径
J Eat Disord. 2024 Aug 26;12(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s40337-024-01091-z.
2
Evaluation of a Collaborative Care Program for Patients With Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: Protocol for a Multiple Case Study.难治性精神分裂症患者协作护理项目评估:多案例研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jun 13;11(6):e35336. doi: 10.2196/35336.
3
Research on a Health Care Personnel Training Model Based on Multilayered Knowledge Mapping for the Integration of Nursing Courses and Examinations.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of an intervention program to increase effective behaviours by patients and clinicians in psychiatric services: Intervention Mapping study.制定干预计划以增加精神科服务中患者和临床医生的有效行为:干预映射研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Oct 25;10:293. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-293.
2
What makes community psychiatric nurses label non-psychotic chronic patients as 'difficult': patient, professional, treatment and social variables.是什么让社区精神科护士将非精神病性慢性患者贴上“难相处”的标签:患者、专业、治疗和社会变量。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2011 Oct;46(10):1045-53. doi: 10.1007/s00127-010-0264-5. Epub 2010 Jul 3.
3
基于多层知识图谱的护理课程与考试整合的医护人员培训模式研究。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Feb 9;2022:3826413. doi: 10.1155/2022/3826413. eCollection 2022.
4
Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long-term health conditions.为患有慢性或长期健康问题的成年人制定个性化护理计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 3;2015(3):CD010523. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010523.pub2.
5
Challenges in measuring outcomes for caregivers of people with mental health problems.衡量心理健康问题患者照料者的结果所面临的挑战。
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2014 Jun;16(2):159-69. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2014.16.2/xzendjidjian.
Mental health nursing from a solution focused perspective.
从解决焦点视角看心理健康护理。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2010 Jun;19(3):210-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2009.00659.x.
4
Time to attainment of recovery from borderline personality disorder and stability of recovery: A 10-year prospective follow-up study.从边缘型人格障碍中恢复的时间和恢复的稳定性:一项为期 10 年的前瞻性随访研究。
Am J Psychiatry. 2010 Jun;167(6):663-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09081130. Epub 2010 Apr 15.
5
Problems in psychiatric care of 'difficult patients': a Delphi-study.“棘手患者”精神科护理中的问题:一项德尔菲研究。
Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2009 Oct-Dec;18(4):323-30.
6
Clinical problems in community mental health care for patients with severe borderline personality disorder.严重边缘型人格障碍患者社区精神卫生保健中的临床问题。
Community Ment Health J. 2009 Dec;45(6):508-16. doi: 10.1007/s10597-009-9259-7. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
7
Community psychiatric nursing in the Netherlands: a survey of a thriving but threatened profession.荷兰社区精神科护理:一项蓬勃发展但受到威胁的职业调查。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2009 Nov;16(9):822-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2009.01461.x.
8
Collaborative mental health care versus care as usual in a primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial.基层医疗环境中协作式精神卫生护理与常规护理的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Jan;60(1):74-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.1.74.
9
Risk management by early recognition of warning signs in patients in forensic psychiatric care.通过早期识别法医精神病护理患者的警示信号进行风险管理。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2008 Aug;22(4):208-16. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2007.06.012.
10
Attitudes of staff towards patients with personality disorder in community mental health teams.社区精神卫生团队中工作人员对人格障碍患者的态度。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2008 Jul;42(7):572-7. doi: 10.1080/00048670802119739.