Teschke Rolf, Wolff Albrecht, Frenzel Christian, Schwarzenboeck Alexander, Schulze Johannes, Eickhoff Axel
Rolf Teschke, Alexander Schwarzenboeck, Axel Eickhoff, Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum Hanau, Academic Teaching Hospital of the Medical Faculty of the Goethe University of Frankfurt/Main, D-63450 Hanau, Germany.
World J Hepatol. 2014 Jan 27;6(1):17-32. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v6.i1.17.
Causality assessment of suspected drug induced liver injury (DILI) and herb induced liver injury (HILI) is hampered by the lack of a standardized approach to be used by attending physicians and at various subsequent evaluating levels. The aim of this review was to analyze the suitability of the liver specific Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) scale as a standard tool for causality assessment in DILI and HILI cases. PubMed database was searched for the following terms: drug induced liver injury; herb induced liver injury; DILI causality assessment; and HILI causality assessment. The strength of the CIOMS lies in its potential as a standardized scale for DILI and HILI causality assessment. Other advantages include its liver specificity and its validation for hepatotoxicity with excellent sensitivity, specificity and predictive validity, based on cases with a positive reexposure test. This scale allows prospective collection of all relevant data required for a valid causality assessment. It does not require expert knowledge in hepatotoxicity and its results may subsequently be refined. Weaknesses of the CIOMS scale include the limited exclusion of alternative causes and qualitatively graded risk factors. In conclusion, CIOMS appears to be suitable as a standard scale for attending physicians, regulatory agencies, expert panels and other scientists to provide a standardized, reproducible causality assessment in suspected DILI and HILI cases, applicable primarily at all assessing levels involved.
由于缺乏供主治医生及后续各级评估使用的标准化方法,疑似药物性肝损伤(DILI)和草药性肝损伤(HILI)的因果关系评估受到阻碍。本综述的目的是分析肝脏特异性的国际医学科学组织理事会(CIOMS)量表作为DILI和HILI病例因果关系评估标准工具的适用性。在PubMed数据库中搜索了以下术语:药物性肝损伤;草药性肝损伤;DILI因果关系评估;以及HILI因果关系评估。CIOMS的优势在于其作为DILI和HILI因果关系评估标准化量表的潜力。其他优点包括其肝脏特异性,以及基于再暴露试验阳性病例对肝毒性进行验证时具有出色的敏感性、特异性和预测效度。该量表允许前瞻性收集有效因果关系评估所需的所有相关数据。它不需要肝毒性方面的专业知识,其结果随后可能会得到完善。CIOMS量表的缺点包括对其他病因的排除有限以及风险因素的定性分级。总之,CIOMS似乎适合作为主治医生、监管机构、专家小组和其他科学家在疑似DILI和HILI病例中进行标准化、可重复因果关系评估的标准量表,主要适用于所有相关评估层面。