Advanced Heart Disease Section, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02446, USA.
J Card Fail. 2011 Jul;17(7):561-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2011.02.013. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
In patients with advanced heart failure (HF), elevated jugular venous pressure (JVP) is the most reliable sign of elevated left-sided filling pressures. However, discordance between right- and left-sided filling pressures (R-L mismatch) could lead to inadequate or excessive therapy guided by JVP. We determined the prevalence of R-L mismatch in the current era and investigated whether mismatch might be identified from clinical information.
Right-sided heart catheterization was performed in 537 consecutive patients hospitalized with advanced HF during complete transplantation evaluation. Patients with high filling pressures were categorized as matched (right atrial pressure (RAP) ≥10 mm Hg and pulmonary wedge pressure (PCWP) ≥22 mm Hg), high-R mismatch (RAP ≥10 but PCWP <22 mm Hg) or high-L mismatch (PCWP ≥22 but RAP <10 mm Hg). Among all of the patients, 195 (36%) were matched low and 194 (36%) were matched high, and 148 (28%) had R-L mismatch. Among patients with high filling pressures, 194 (57%) were matched high and 82 (24%) had high-L and 66 (19%) high-R mismatch. Mismatches were not associated with differences in demographic or clinical data, including pulmonary and hepatic function, or severity of valvular regurgitation and right ventricular function by echo. However, among all patients with RAP ≥10 mm Hg, pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) was higher in those patients with matched high left- and right-sided pressures (59 ± 12 mm Hg) versus high-R mismatch (41 ± 13 mm Hg; P < .0001). Similarly among all patients with low RAP, PASP was lower in patients with matched low right- and left-side pressures (33 ± 11 mm Hg) versus high-L mismatch (53 ± 13 mm Hg; P < .0001).
R-L mismatch was present in >1 in 4 total patients, and >1 in 3 with elevated filling pressures. Regardless of clinical history, when empiric therapy to optimize volume status to JVP is not effective, additional measurement should be considered to establish the R-L relationship.
在患有晚期心力衰竭(HF)的患者中,颈静脉压(JVP)升高是左心充盈压升高的最可靠征象。然而,右心和左心充盈压之间的不匹配(R-L 不匹配)可能导致基于 JVP 的治疗不足或过度。我们确定了在当前时代 R-L 不匹配的患病率,并研究了是否可以从临床信息中识别出不匹配。
对 537 例因晚期 HF 接受完整移植评估而住院的患者进行了右侧心导管检查。高充盈压患者分为匹配组(右心房压(RAP)≥10mmHg 和肺楔压(PCWP)≥22mmHg)、高-R 不匹配组(RAP≥10mmHg 但 PCWP<22mmHg)或高-L 不匹配组(PCWP≥22mmHg 但 RAP<10mmHg)。在所有患者中,195 例(36%)为低匹配,194 例(36%)为高匹配,148 例(28%)为 R-L 不匹配。在高充盈压患者中,194 例(57%)为高匹配,82 例(24%)为高-L 不匹配,66 例(19%)为高-R 不匹配。不匹配与人口统计学或临床数据(包括肺和肝功能)或瓣膜反流和右心室功能的严重程度无差异,通过超声心动图评估。然而,在所有 RAP≥10mmHg 的患者中,与左、右心压力匹配的高值患者相比(59±12mmHg),RAP 不匹配的患者的肺动脉收缩压(PASP)更高(41±13mmHg;P<.0001)。同样,在所有 RAP 低值患者中,与左、右心压力匹配的低值患者相比(33±11mmHg),RAP 不匹配的患者的 PASP 更低(53±13mmHg;P<.0001)。
在所有患者中,>1/4 的患者存在 R-L 不匹配,>1/3 的患者存在充盈压升高。无论临床病史如何,如果基于 JVP 优化容量状态的经验性治疗无效,应考虑额外测量以确定 R-L 关系。