School of Psychology, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4222, Queensland, Australia.
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):2704-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Jun 25.
We tested whether developmental coordination disorder (DCD) and mixed receptive expressive language disorder (RELD) are valid diagnoses by assessing whether they are separated from each other, from other childhood disorders, and from normality by natural boundaries termed zones of rarity. Standardized measures of intelligence, language, motor skills, social cognition, and executive functioning were administered to children with DCD (n = 22), RELD (n = 30), autistic disorder (n = 30), mental retardation (n = 24), attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (n = 53) and to a representative sample of children (n = 449). Discriminant function scores were used to test whether there were zones of rarity between the DCD, RELD, and other groups. DCD and RELD were reliably distinguishable only from the mental retardation group. Cluster and latent class analyses both resulted in only two clusters or classes being identified, one consisting mainly of typical children and the other of children with a disorder. Fifty percent of children in the DCD group and 20% in the RELD group were clustered with typical children. There was no evidence of zones of rarity between disorders. Rather, with the exception of mental retardation, the results imply there are no natural boundaries between disorders or between disorders and normality.
我们通过评估发育性协调障碍 (DCD) 和混合性接受性表达性语言障碍 (RELD) 是否通过被称为稀有区的自然边界彼此分离、与其他儿童障碍分离以及与正常状态分离,来检验它们是否为有效诊断。对患有 DCD(n=22)、RELD(n=30)、自闭症障碍(n=30)、智力迟钝(n=24)、注意力缺陷/多动障碍(n=53)的儿童以及代表性样本儿童(n=449)进行了标准化的智力、语言、运动技能、社会认知和执行功能测量。判别函数得分用于检验 DCD、RELD 和其他组之间是否存在稀有区。只有 DCD 和 RELD 与智力迟钝组可靠地区分开来。聚类和潜在类别分析都只确定了两个聚类或类别,一个主要由典型儿童组成,另一个由患有障碍的儿童组成。50%的 DCD 组儿童和 20%的 RELD 组儿童与典型儿童聚类在一起。在疾病之间没有发现稀有区的证据。相反,除智力迟钝外,结果表明,疾病之间或疾病与正常状态之间没有自然边界。