Suppr超能文献

基因筛查。

Genetic screening.

机构信息

Department of Bioethics and Humanities, A204 Health Sciences Building, Box 357120, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

出版信息

Epidemiol Rev. 2011;33(1):148-64. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxr008. Epub 2011 Jun 27.

Abstract

Current approaches to genetic screening include newborn screening to identify infants who would benefit from early treatment, reproductive genetic screening to assist reproductive decision making, and family history assessment to identify individuals who would benefit from additional prevention measures. Although the traditional goal of screening is to identify early disease or risk in order to implement preventive therapy, genetic screening has always included an atypical element-information relevant to reproductive decisions. New technologies offer increasingly comprehensive identification of genetic conditions and susceptibilities. Tests based on these technologies are generating a different approach to screening that seeks to inform individuals about all of their genetic traits and susceptibilities for purposes that incorporate rapid diagnosis, family planning, and expediting of research, as well as the traditional screening goal of improving prevention. Use of these tests in population screening will increase the challenges already encountered in genetic screening programs, including false-positive and ambiguous test results, overdiagnosis, and incidental findings. Whether this approach is desirable requires further empiric research, but it also requires careful deliberation on the part of all concerned, including genomic researchers, clinicians, public health officials, health care payers, and especially those who will be the recipients of this novel screening approach.

摘要

目前的遗传筛查方法包括新生儿筛查,以确定哪些婴儿需要早期治疗;生殖遗传筛查,以帮助生殖决策;家族史评估,以确定哪些人需要采取额外的预防措施。虽然筛查的传统目标是识别早期疾病或风险,以便实施预防治疗,但遗传筛查一直包括一个非典型的元素——与生殖决策相关的信息。新技术提供了越来越全面的遗传疾病和易感性识别。基于这些技术的测试正在产生一种不同的筛查方法,旨在为个人提供有关其所有遗传特征和易感性的信息,这些信息可用于快速诊断、计划生育以及加速研究,以及传统的改善预防的筛查目标。在人群筛查中使用这些测试将增加遗传筛查计划中已经遇到的挑战,包括假阳性和模棱两可的测试结果、过度诊断和偶然发现。这种方法是否可取需要进一步的实证研究,但也需要所有相关方,包括基因组研究人员、临床医生、公共卫生官员、医疗保健支付者,特别是那些将成为这种新的筛查方法接受者的人,进行仔细考虑。

相似文献

1
Genetic screening.基因筛查。
Epidemiol Rev. 2011;33(1):148-64. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxr008. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
3
Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies.单胎妊娠胎儿非整倍体的产前筛查。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011 Jul;33(7):736-750. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34961-1.
5
Genetic screening: marvel or menace?基因筛查:奇迹还是威胁?
Science. 1984 Jul 13;225(4658):138-44. doi: 10.1126/science.6729472.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Options for Down syndrome screening: what will women choose?唐氏综合征筛查的选项:女性会如何选择?
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2005 May-Jun;50(3):211-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2005.01.008.
10
On the current dilemma of Down syndrome screening.论唐氏综合征筛查当前面临的困境
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jan;107(1):2-3. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000195237.90130.7e.

引用本文的文献

6
The evolution of prenatal care delivery guidelines in the United States.美国产前护理指南的演变。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr;224(4):339-347. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.12.016. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
7
Assessing the implications of positive genomic screening results.评估基因组筛查阳性结果的影响。
Per Med. 2020 Mar;17(2):101-109. doi: 10.2217/pme-2019-0067. Epub 2020 Mar 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic Counseling: Clinical Geneticists' Views.遗传咨询:临床遗传学家的观点。
J Genet Couns. 1999 Oct;8(5):275-87. doi: 10.1023/A:1022930215375.
8
Preparing for a consumer-driven genomic age.为消费者驱动的基因组时代做准备。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 16;363(12):1099-103. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1006202. Epub 2010 Aug 18.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验