Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2011 Aug;19(4):403-12. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572011005000017. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
The aim of this study was to compare the polimerization ability of three different light-curing units (quartz tungsten halogen, light-emitting diodes and plasma arc) and their exposure modes (high-intensity and soft-start) by determination of microhardness, water sorption and solubility, and diametral tensile strength of 5 dual-curing resin cements.
A total of 720 disc-shaped samples (1 mm height and 5 mm diameter) were prepared from different dual-curing resin cements (Duolink, Nexus, Bifix-QM, Panavia F and RelyX Unicem). Photoactivation was performed by using quartz tungsten halogen (high-power and soft-up modes), light-emitting diode (standard and exponential modes) and plasma arc (normal and ramp-curing modes) curing units through ceramic discs. Then the samples (n=8/per group) were stored dry in the dark at 37°C for 24 h. The Vickers hardness test was performed on the resin cement layer with a microhardness tester (Shimadzu HMV). For sorption and solubility tests; the samples were stored in a desiccator at 37°C and weighed to a constant mass. The samples were weighed both before and after being immersed in deionized water for different periods of time (24 h and 7 days) and being desiccated. The diametral tensile strength of the samples was tested in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed statistically by nonparametric Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests at 5% significance level.
Resin cement and light-curing unit had significant effects (p<0.05) on microhardness, diametral tensile strength, water solubility and sorption. However, no significant differences (p>0.05) were obtained with different modes of LCUs.
The study indicates that polymerization of resin cements with different light-curing units may result in various polymer structures, and consequently different mechanical and physical properties.
本研究旨在比较三种不同的光固化单元(石英钨卤素、发光二极管和等离子电弧)及其曝光模式(高强度和软启动)的聚合能力,通过测定 5 种双固化树脂水门汀的显微硬度、吸水和溶胀率以及直径拉伸强度来评估。
从不同的双固化树脂水门汀(Duolink、Nexus、Bifix-QM、Panavia F 和 RelyX Unicem)中制备了 720 个圆盘状样本(高度 1mm,直径 5mm)。通过陶瓷盘用光固化单元(高功率和软启动模式)、发光二极管(标准和指数模式)和等离子电弧(正常和斜坡固化模式)对样本进行光固化。然后将样本(n=8/组)在 37°C 下黑暗中干燥保存 24 小时。使用显微硬度计(Shimadzu HMV)对树脂水门汀层进行维氏硬度测试。为了进行吸水和溶胀测试,将样本储存在 37°C 的干燥器中,并在恒质量下称重。将样本在不同时间段(24 小时和 7 天)浸入去离子水中并干燥后,分别进行称重。使用万能试验机以 0.5mm/min 的十字头速度测试样本的直径拉伸强度。在 5%的显著性水平下,采用非参数 Kruskal Wallis 和 Mann-Whitney U 检验对数据进行统计分析。
树脂水门汀和光固化单元对显微硬度、直径拉伸强度、水溶解度和吸水有显著影响(p<0.05)。然而,LCU 的不同模式之间没有得到显著差异(p>0.05)。
研究表明,不同光固化单元聚合树脂水门汀可能导致不同的聚合结构,进而产生不同的机械和物理性能。