Edelman Gerald M, Gally Joseph A, Baars Bernard J
The Neurosciences Institute San Diego CA, USA.
Front Psychol. 2011 Jan 25;2:4. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00004. eCollection 2011.
The Dynamic Core and Global Workspace hypotheses were independently put forward to provide mechanistic and biologically plausible accounts of how brains generate conscious mental content. The Dynamic Core proposes that reentrant neural activity in the thalamocortical system gives rise to conscious experience. Global Workspace reconciles the limited capacity of momentary conscious content with the vast repertoire of long-term memory. In this paper we show the close relationship between the two hypotheses. This relationship allows for a strictly biological account of phenomenal experience and subjectivity that is consistent with mounting experimental evidence. We examine the constraints on causal analyses of consciousness and suggest that there is now sufficient evidence to consider the design and construction of a conscious artifact.
动态核心假说和全局工作空间假说分别被提出,旨在为大脑如何产生有意识的心理内容提供具有机制性和生物学合理性的解释。动态核心假说提出,丘脑皮质系统中的折返式神经活动会产生有意识的体验。全局工作空间假说则将瞬间有意识内容的有限容量与长期记忆的大量储备协调起来。在本文中,我们展示了这两种假说之间的密切关系。这种关系使得对现象体验和主观性能够进行严格的生物学解释,这与越来越多的实验证据相一致。我们研究了对意识因果分析的限制,并表明现在有足够的证据来考虑设计和构建一个有意识的人工制品。