Suppr超能文献

组织背景很重要:开展综合护理举措标准化案例研究的研究工具包。

Organizational Context Matters: A Research Toolkit for Conducting Standardized Case Studies of Integrated Care Initiatives.

作者信息

Evans Jenna M, Grudniewicz Agnes, Gray Carolyn Steele, Wodchis Walter P, Carswell Peter, Baker G Ross

机构信息

Cancer Care Ontario, CA.

Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, CA.

出版信息

Int J Integr Care. 2017 Jun 27;17(2):9. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2502.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The variable success of integrated care initiatives has led experts to recommend tailoring design and implementation to the organizational context. Yet, organizational contexts are rarely described, understood, or measured with sufficient depth and breadth in empirical studies or in practice. We thus lack knowledge of when and specifically how organizational contexts matter. To facilitate the accumulation of evidence, we developed a research toolkit for conducting case studies using standardized measures of the (inter-)organizational context for integrating care.

THEORY AND METHODS

We used a multi-method approach to develop the research toolkit: (1) development and validation of the Context and Capabilities for Integrating Care (CCIC) Framework, (2) identification, assessment, and selection of survey instruments, (3) development of document review methods, (4) development of interview guide resources, and (5) pilot testing of the document review guidelines, consolidated survey, and interview guide.

RESULTS

The toolkit provides a framework and measurement tools that examine 18 organizational and inter-organizational factors that affect the implementation and success of integrated care initiatives.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The toolkit can be used to characterize and compare organizational contexts across cases and enable comparison of results across studies. This information can enhance our understanding of the influence of organizational contexts, support the transfer of best practices, and help explain why some integrated care initiatives succeed and some fail.

摘要

引言

综合护理举措的成效参差不齐,这使得专家们建议根据组织背景来定制设计与实施方案。然而,在实证研究或实践中,组织背景很少得到足够深入和广泛的描述、理解或衡量。因此,我们并不清楚组织背景在何时以及具体如何产生影响。为了促进证据的积累,我们开发了一个研究工具包,用于使用整合护理的(组织间)背景的标准化测量方法进行案例研究。

理论与方法

我们采用多方法途径来开发研究工具包:(1)整合护理的背景与能力(CCIC)框架的开发与验证,(2)调查工具的识别、评估和选择,(3)文件审查方法的开发,(4)访谈指南资源的开发,以及(5)文件审查指南、综合调查和访谈指南的试点测试。

结果

该工具包提供了一个框架和测量工具,用于考察影响综合护理举措实施与成效的18个组织和组织间因素。

讨论与结论

该工具包可用于描述和比较不同案例的组织背景,并实现不同研究结果的比较。这些信息可以增进我们对组织背景影响的理解,支持最佳实践的推广,并有助于解释为何一些综合护理举措成功而一些失败。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0249/5624120/da58c729d6cd/ijic-17-2-2502-g1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验