Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands.
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Sep 1;108(5):711-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.04.023. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
Triplane tissue synchronization imaging (TSI) and real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) provide different characterizations of left ventricular (LV) mechanics and dyssynchrony. Triplane TSI assesses differences in time to peak systolic segmental myocardial tissue velocities, whereas RT3DE evaluates differences in time to minimum end-systolic regional volumes. Whether an approach using the 2 3D techniques predicts better significant reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains unknown. In 166 patients (mean age 66 ± 9 years, 78% men) treated with CRT, baseline LV dyssynchrony was assessed using RT3DE and triplane TSI. LV dyssynchrony was defined by a systolic dyssynchrony index ≥6.4% when assessed with RT3DE and SD of time to peak velocity of 12 segments (Ts-SD-12) ≥33 ms with triplane TSI. CRT response was defined by ≥15% decrease in LV end-systolic volume at 6-month follow-up. Mean LV dyssynchrony using Ts-SD-12 was 48 ± 26 ms and mean systolic dyssynchrony index was 8.51 ± 3.81%. Response to CRT was observed in 86.3% of patients showing LV dyssynchrony with the 2 methods. In contrast, 97% of patients who did not show significant LV dyssynchrony with any of the techniques were nonresponders (p <0.001). Importantly, systolic dyssynchrony index and LV dyssynchrony using Ts-SD-12 were independent predictors of response to CRT (p <0.001 for each technique). Assessment of LV dyssynchrony with the 2 techniques showed incremental value for prediction of significant LV reverse remodeling over its assessment with only 1 technique (chi-square 90.18, p <0.001). In conclusion, the combined use of 2 different 3D techniques to assess LV dyssynchrony permits accurate prediction of response to CRT.
三平面组织同步成像(TSI)和实时三维超声心动图(RT3DE)提供了左心室(LV)力学和不同步的不同特征。三平面 TSI 评估峰值收缩节段心肌组织速度达到峰值的时间差异,而 RT3DE 评估最小收缩末期区域容积的时间差异。使用这两种 3D 技术的方法是否能更好地预测心脏再同步治疗(CRT)后的显著逆重构仍然未知。在 166 例(平均年龄 66±9 岁,78%为男性)接受 CRT 治疗的患者中,使用 RT3DE 和三平面 TSI 评估基线 LV 不同步。LV 不同步定义为 RT3DE 评估的收缩不同步指数≥6.4%,三平面 TSI 的 12 节段峰值速度时间标准差(Ts-SD-12)≥33ms。CRT 反应定义为 6 个月随访时 LV 收缩末期容积减少≥15%。使用 Ts-SD-12 的平均 LV 不同步为 48±26ms,平均收缩不同步指数为 8.51±3.81%。两种方法均显示 LV 不同步的患者中,86.3%的患者对 CRT 有反应。相反,任何一种技术均未显示明显 LV 不同步的患者中,97%的患者为无反应者(p<0.001)。重要的是,收缩不同步指数和 Ts-SD-12 上的 LV 不同步是 CRT 反应的独立预测因子(每种技术的 p<0.001)。使用两种技术评估 LV 不同步对预测 LV 显著逆重构的价值高于仅使用一种技术(卡方 90.18,p<0.001)。总之,使用两种不同的 3D 技术联合评估 LV 不同步可准确预测 CRT 的反应。