Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Diabetes Care. 2011 Aug;34(8):1804-8. doi: 10.2337/dc11-0182. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
Insulin administered by jet injectors is dispensed over a larger subcutaneous area than insulin injected with a syringe, which may facilitate a more rapid absorption. This study compared the pharmacologic profile of administration of insulin aspart by jet injection to that by conventional insulin pen.
Euglycemic glucose clamp tests were performed in 18 healthy volunteers after subcutaneous administration of 0.2 units/kg body wt of aspart, either administered by jet injection or by conventional pen, using a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, cross over study design. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles were derived from the glucose infusion rate (GIR) needed to maintain euglycemia and from plasma insulin levels, respectively.
The time to maximal GIR was significantly shorter when insulin was injected with the jet injector compared with conventional pen administration (51 ± 3 vs. 105 ± 11 min, P < 0.0001). The time to peak insulin concentration was similarly reduced (31 ± 3 vs. 64 ± 6 min, P < 0.0001) and peak insulin concentrations were increased (108 ± 13 vs. 79 ± 7 mU/L, P = 0.01) when insulin was injected by jet injection compared with conventional pen injection. Jet injector insulin administration reduced the time to 50% glucose disposal by ∼40 min (P < 0.0001). There were no differences in maximal GIR, total insulin absorption, or total insulin action between the two devices.
Administration of insulin aspart by jet injection enhances insulin absorption and reduces the duration of glucose-lowering action. This profile resembles more closely the pattern of endogenous insulin secretion and may help to achieve better meal insulin coverage and correction of postprandial glucose excursions.
与注射器注射相比,通过喷射注射器给予的胰岛素在更大的皮下面积上给药,这可能有助于更快速地吸收。这项研究比较了通过喷射注射器给予门冬胰岛素与通过传统胰岛素笔给予门冬胰岛素的药代动力学特征。
在 18 名健康志愿者中进行了正葡萄糖钳夹试验,在皮下给予 0.2 单位/公斤体重的门冬后,使用随机、双盲、双模拟、交叉研究设计,通过喷射注射器或传统笔给予门冬。药效学和药代动力学特征分别来自于维持正常血糖所需的葡萄糖输注率(GIR)和血浆胰岛素水平。
与传统笔注射相比,通过喷射注射器给予胰岛素时,达到最大 GIR 的时间明显缩短(51 ± 3 与 105 ± 11 分钟,P < 0.0001)。达到胰岛素峰值浓度的时间也相应缩短(31 ± 3 与 64 ± 6 分钟,P < 0.0001),峰值胰岛素浓度增加(108 ± 13 与 79 ± 7 mU/L,P = 0.01),与传统笔注射相比,通过喷射注射器给予胰岛素时。与传统笔注射相比,喷射注射器胰岛素给药将 50%葡萄糖处置时间缩短了约 40 分钟(P < 0.0001)。两种装置之间的最大 GIR、总胰岛素吸收或总胰岛素作用没有差异。
通过喷射注射器给予门冬胰岛素可增强胰岛素吸收并缩短降低血糖作用的持续时间。这种模式更类似于内源性胰岛素分泌的模式,可能有助于更好地覆盖餐时胰岛素并纠正餐后血糖波动。