Environmental Sciences and Energy Research, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Plant Physiol. 2011 Sep;157(1):509-17. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.176578. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
Carbonyl sulfide (COS) and C(18)OO exchange by leaves provide potentially powerful tracers of biosphere-atmosphere CO(2) exchange, and both are assumed to depend on carbonic anhydrase (CA) activity and conductance along the diffusive pathway in leaves. We investigated these links using C(3) and C(4) plants, hypothesizing that the rates of COS and C(18)OO exchange by leaves respond in parallel to environmental and biological drivers. Using CA-deficient antisense lines of C(4) and C(3) plants, COS uptake was essentially eliminated and discrimination against C(18)OO exchange ((18)Δ) greatly reduced, demonstrating CA's key role in both processes. (18)Δ showed a positive linear correlation with leaf relative uptake (LRU; ratio of COS to CO(2) assimilation rates, A(s)/A(c), normalized to their respective ambient concentrations), which reflected the effects of stomatal conductance on both COS and C(18)OO exchange. Unexpectedly, a decoupling between A(s) and (18)Δ was observed in comparing C(4) and C(3) plants, with a large decrease in (18)Δ but no parallel reduction in A(s) in the former. This could be explained by C(4) plants having higher COS concentrations at the CA site (maintaining high A(s) with reduced CA) and a high phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase/CA activity ratio (reducing (18)O exchange efficiency between CO(2) and water, but not A(s)). Similar A(s) but higher A(c) in C(4) versus C(3) plants resulted in lower LRU values in the former (1.16 ± 0.20 and 1.82 ± 0.18 for C(4) and C(3), respectively). LRU was, however, relatively constant in both plant types across a wide range of conditions, except low light (<191 μmol photon m(-2) s(-1)).
羰基硫(COS)和 C(18)OO 通过叶片的交换为生物圈-大气 CO(2)交换提供了潜在的强大示踪剂,并且两者都被认为取决于碳酸酐酶(CA)的活性和叶片扩散途径中的传导能力。我们使用 C(3)和 C(4)植物对此进行了研究,假设叶片中 COS 和 C(18)OO 交换的速率会与环境和生物驱动因素平行响应。我们使用 C(4)和 C(3)植物的 CA 缺陷反义系,实质上消除了 COS 的吸收,并且极大地降低了 C(18)OO 交换的歧视性(18)Δ,这证明了 CA 在这两个过程中的关键作用。(18)Δ与叶片相对吸收(LRU;COS 与 CO(2)同化率的比值,A(s)/A(c),归一化为各自的环境浓度)呈正线性相关,这反映了气孔导度对 COS 和 C(18)OO 交换的影响。出乎意料的是,在比较 C(4)和 C(3)植物时,观察到 A(s)与(18)Δ之间的解耦,(18)Δ大幅下降,但 A(s)没有相应减少。这可以用 C(4)植物在 CA 位点具有较高的 COS 浓度(在减少 CA 的情况下保持高 A(s))和较高的磷酸烯醇丙酮酸羧化酶/CA 活性比(降低 CO(2)和水之间的(18)O 交换效率,但不降低 A(s))来解释。C(4)植物的 A(s)相似但 A(c)高于 C(3)植物,导致前者的 LRU 值较低(C(4)和 C(3)分别为 1.16 ± 0.20 和 1.82 ± 0.18)。然而,除了低光(<191 μmol 光子 m(-2) s(-1))之外,LRU 在两种植物类型中在广泛的条件下相对稳定。