Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.
ISME J. 2019 Feb;13(2):290-300. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0270-2. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
Differentiating the contributions of photosynthesis and respiration to the global carbon cycle is critical for improving predictive climate models. Carbonic anhydrase (CA) activity in leaves is responsible for the largest biosphere-atmosphere trace gas fluxes of carbonyl sulfide (COS) and the oxygen-18 isotopologue of carbon dioxide (COO) that both reflect gross photosynthetic rates. However, CA activity also occurs in soils and will be a source of uncertainty in the use of COS and COO as carbon cycle tracers until process-based constraints are improved. In this study, we measured COS and COO exchange rates and estimated the corresponding CA activity in soils from a range of biomes and land use types. Soil CA activity was not uniform for COS and CO, and patterns of divergence were related to microbial community composition and CA gene expression patterns. In some cases, the same microbial taxa and CA classes catalyzed both COS and CO reactions in soil, but in other cases the specificity towards the two substrates differed markedly. CA activity for COS was related to fungal taxa and β-D-CA expression, whereas CA activity for CO was related to algal and bacterial taxa and α-CA expression. This study integrates gas exchange measurements, enzyme activity models, and characterization of soil taxonomic and genetic diversity to build connections between CA activity and the soil microbiome. Importantly, our results identify kinetic parameters to represent soil CA activity during application of COS and COO as carbon cycle tracers.
区分光合作用和呼吸作用对全球碳循环的贡献对于改进预测气候模型至关重要。叶片中的碳酸酐酶 (CA) 活性负责生物圈-大气之间最大的碳酰硫 (COS) 和二氧化碳的氧-18 同位素 (COO) 的痕量气体通量,这两者都反映了总光合作用速率。然而,CA 活性也存在于土壤中,并且在基于过程的限制得到改善之前,将 COS 和 COO 用作碳循环示踪剂将是一个不确定因素。在这项研究中,我们测量了来自一系列生物群落和土地利用类型的土壤中 COS 和 COO 的交换速率,并估计了相应的 CA 活性。土壤 CA 活性对 COS 和 CO 并不均匀,并且发散模式与微生物群落组成和 CA 基因表达模式有关。在某些情况下,相同的微生物类群和 CA 类催化了土壤中 COS 和 CO 的反应,但在其他情况下,两种底物的特异性明显不同。COS 的 CA 活性与真菌类群和β-D-CA 表达有关,而 CO 的 CA 活性与藻类和细菌类群和α-CA 表达有关。本研究综合了气体交换测量、酶活性模型以及土壤分类和遗传多样性的特征,以建立 CA 活性与土壤微生物组之间的联系。重要的是,我们的结果确定了动力学参数,以代表在应用 COS 和 COO 作为碳循环示踪剂时的土壤 CA 活性。