Suppr超能文献

一项关于电子健康干预促进身体活动的系统评价:对研究设计、干预措施特征和结局的分析。

A systematic review of e-health interventions for physical activity: an analysis of study design, intervention characteristics, and outcomes.

机构信息

Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.

出版信息

Telemed J E Health. 2011 Sep;17(7):509-23. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0013. Epub 2011 Jun 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This systematic literature review of e-health interventions targeting physical activity (PA) from January 2006 to November 2010 provides an updated and critical picture of the state of e-health as a facilitator for PA interventions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search yielded 31 articles that fit into the inclusion/exclusion criteria, which were analyzed in terms of study design quality, intervention characteristics, and support for e-health in PA interventions.

RESULTS

The included articles met most of the study design criteria, but many did not isolate e-health technologies or use power analyses to calculate sample sizes. The interventions reflected a variety of technologies, audiences, and methods, and showed consistent use of theoretical frameworks to guide the interventions. Results regarding support for e-health's effectiveness in PA interventions were mixed and cannot provide definite conclusions. Only seven studies used pure control groups, and of those, four demonstrated support for e-health but the others showed no significant differences. The majority of studies using comparison groups showed no significant differences between conditions. No notable patterns emerged among the studies that did show support for e-health.

CONCLUSIONS

Future research should utilize more rigorous methods that allow for better comparison across studies, such as power analyses, pure control groups, and objective PA measurements, which could lead to more definitive results regarding e-health's effectiveness for PA interventions.

摘要

目的

本系统文献回顾于 2006 年 1 月至 2010 年 11 月间,针对电子健康干预措施对身体活动(PA)的影响进行了研究,为电子健康作为 PA 干预措施的促进因素提供了最新且具有批判性的观点。

材料与方法

系统搜索得到 31 篇符合纳入/排除标准的文章,从研究设计质量、干预措施特征以及对 PA 干预措施中电子健康的支持等方面进行了分析。

结果

纳入的文章基本符合研究设计标准,但许多文章并未隔离电子健康技术或使用功效分析来计算样本量。干预措施反映了各种技术、受众和方法,并一致使用理论框架来指导干预措施。关于电子健康对 PA 干预措施有效性的支持结果喜忧参半,无法得出明确的结论。只有 7 项研究使用了纯对照组,其中 4 项研究支持电子健康,但其余研究并未显示出显著差异。使用比较组的大多数研究在条件之间也未显示出显著差异。在支持电子健康的研究中并未出现明显的模式。

结论

未来的研究应采用更严格的方法,例如功效分析、纯对照组和客观的 PA 测量,从而能够在研究之间进行更好的比较,为电子健康对 PA 干预措施的有效性提供更明确的结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验