Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland, USA.
Behav Sleep Med. 2011;9(3):184-93. doi: 10.1080/15402002.2011.583906.
Actigraphy provides a non-invasive objective means to assess sleep-wake cycles. In young children, parent logs can also be useful for obtaining sleep-wake information. The authors hypothesized that actigraphy and parent logs were both equally valid instruments in healthy preschool-aged children. The authors studied 59 children aged 3 to 5 years in full-time day care. Each child was screened for medical problems and developmental delays before being fitted with an actigraphy watch, which was worn for 1 week. Parents maintained logs of sleep and wakefulness during the same period, with input from day care workers. In general, parents overestimated the amount of nighttime sleep measured by actigraphy by 13% to 22% (all significant). Although there was no difference in sleep onset times, parents reported later rise times on the weekend and fewer nighttime awakenings. There was no significant difference between parent logs and actigraphy with regard to daytime napping. The authors conclude that parent logs are best utilized in assessing daytime sleep and sleep onset, whereas actigraphy should be used to assess nighttime sleep and sleep offset time.
活动记录仪提供了一种非侵入性的客观手段来评估睡眠-觉醒周期。在幼儿中,家长日志也可以用于获取睡眠-觉醒信息。作者假设活动记录仪和家长日志在健康的学龄前儿童中都是同样有效的工具。作者研究了 59 名 3 至 5 岁的全日托儿童。在为每个孩子佩戴活动记录仪之前,先对他们进行医疗问题和发育迟缓的筛查,佩戴时间为 1 周。在此期间,家长们记录了孩子的睡眠和觉醒情况,并得到了日托工作人员的帮助。总的来说,父母对活动记录仪测量的夜间睡眠时间的估计值高估了 13%至 22%(均有统计学意义)。尽管入睡时间没有差异,但父母报告周末起床时间较晚,夜间醒来次数较少。在白天小睡方面,家长日志和活动记录仪之间没有显著差异。作者得出结论,家长日志最适合评估白天的睡眠和入睡时间,而活动记录仪应用于评估夜间睡眠和睡眠结束时间。