• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统评价代理报告问卷评估 0-5 岁幼儿的身体活动、久坐行为和/或睡眠。

A systematic review of proxy-report questionnaires assessing physical activity, sedentary behavior and/or sleep in young children (aged 0-5 years).

机构信息

Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081, BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Health Promotion, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Feb 14;19(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01251-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12966-022-01251-x
PMID:35164783
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8845346/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurate proxy-report questionnaires, adapted to the child's developmental stage, are required to monitor 24-h movement behaviors in young children, especially for large samples and low-resource settings.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to summarize available studies evaluating measurement properties of proxy-report questionnaires assessing physical activity, sedentary behavior and/or sleep in children aged 0-5 years.

METHODS

Systematic literature searches were carried out in the PubMed, Embase and SPORTDiscus databases, up to January 2021. For physical activity and sedentary behavior questionnaires this is a review update, whereas for sleep questionnaires we included all relevant studies published up to now. Studies had to evaluate at least one of the measurement properties of a proxy-report questionnaire assessing at least duration and/or frequency of physical activity, sedentary behavior and/or sleep in 0- to 5-year-old children. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline was used to evaluate the quality of evidence.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies were included, examining a total of 37 questionnaires. Ten questionnaires were designed for infants, two for toddlers, 11 for preschoolers, and 14 for a broader age range targeting multiple of these age groups. Twenty questionnaires assessed constructs of sleep, four assessed constructs of physical activity, two assessed screen behavior, five assessed constructs of both physical activity and sedentary behavior, and six assessed constructs of all 24-h movement behaviors. Content validity was evaluated for six questionnaires, structural validity for two, internal consistency for three, test-retest reliability for 16, measurement error for one, criterion validity for one, and construct validity for 26 questionnaires. None of the questionnaires were considered sufficiently valid and/or reliable for assessing one or more movement behaviors in 0- to 5-year-old children, and the quality of evidence was mostly low or very low.

CONCLUSIONS

Valid and/or reliable questionnaires assessing 24-h movement behaviors in 0- to 5-year-olds are lacking. High-quality studies are therefore required, to develop proxy-report questionnaires and evaluate their measurement properties.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020169268.

摘要

背景

为了监测幼儿 24 小时的运动行为,特别是对于大样本和资源匮乏的环境,需要使用经过儿童发育阶段调整的准确代理报告问卷。

目的

本综述旨在总结评估 0-5 岁儿童体力活动、久坐行为和/或睡眠的代理报告问卷的测量特性的现有研究。

方法

系统地在 PubMed、Embase 和 SPORTDiscus 数据库中进行文献检索,检索时间截至 2021 年 1 月。对于体力活动和久坐行为问卷,这是一项综述更新,而对于睡眠问卷,我们纳入了迄今为止所有相关的研究。研究必须评估至少一个代理报告问卷的测量特性,该问卷评估了 0-5 岁儿童的体力活动、久坐行为和/或睡眠的持续时间和/或频率。使用共识基础的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)指南来评估证据的质量。

结果

共纳入 33 项研究,共涉及 37 个问卷。其中 10 个问卷是为婴儿设计的,2 个为学步儿设计的,11 个为学龄前儿童设计的,14 个为针对多个年龄组的更广泛的年龄范围设计的。20 个问卷评估睡眠结构,4 个评估体力活动结构,2 个评估屏幕行为,5 个评估体力活动和久坐行为的结构,6 个评估所有 24 小时运动行为的结构。有 6 个问卷评估了内容效度,2 个评估了结构效度,3 个评估了内部一致性,16 个评估了重测信度,1 个评估了测量误差,1 个评估了标准效度,26 个问卷评估了结构效度。没有一个问卷被认为在评估 0-5 岁儿童的一种或多种运动行为方面足够有效和/或可靠,并且证据质量大多为低或极低。

结论

缺乏评估 0-5 岁儿童 24 小时运动行为的有效和/或可靠问卷。因此,需要高质量的研究来开发代理报告问卷并评估其测量特性。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42020169268。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a38/8845346/5043deee3877/12966_2022_1251_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a38/8845346/5043deee3877/12966_2022_1251_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a38/8845346/5043deee3877/12966_2022_1251_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A systematic review of proxy-report questionnaires assessing physical activity, sedentary behavior and/or sleep in young children (aged 0-5 years).系统评价代理报告问卷评估 0-5 岁幼儿的身体活动、久坐行为和/或睡眠。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Feb 14;19(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01251-x.
2
Systematic review of accelerometer-based methods for 24-h physical behavior assessment in young children (0-5 years old).基于加速度计的 0-5 岁幼儿 24 小时身体活动评估方法的系统评价。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Sep 8;19(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01296-y.
3
A systematic review of tools designed for teacher proxy-report of children's physical literacy or constituting elements.系统评价教师代理报告儿童身体素养或构成要素的工具。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Oct 8;18(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01162-3.
4
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
5
Questionnaires Measuring 24-Hour Movement Behaviors in Childhood and Adolescence: Content Description and Measurement Properties-A Systematic Review.测量儿童和青少年24小时运动行为的问卷:内容描述与测量属性——一项系统综述
J Phys Act Health. 2022 Dec 6;20(1):50-76. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2022-0399. Print 2023 Jan 1.
6
Non-pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in hospitalized children.促进住院儿童睡眠的非药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 15;6(6):CD012908. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012908.pub2.
7
A systematic review of the validity, reliability, and feasibility of measurement tools used to assess the physical activity and sedentary behaviour of pre-school aged children.系统评价用于评估学龄前儿童身体活动和久坐行为的测量工具的有效性、可靠性和可行性。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Nov 4;18(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01132-9.
8
Clinical rating scales for assessing pain in newborn infants.评估新生儿疼痛的临床评定量表。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 14;4(4):MR000064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000064.pub2.
9
School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18.以学校为基础的身体活动计划促进 6 至 18 岁儿童和青少年身体活动和健康。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 23;9(9):CD007651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007651.pub3.
10
Accuracy and Precision of Consumer-Grade Wearable Activity Monitors for Assessing Time Spent in Sedentary Behavior in Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review.消费者级可穿戴活动监测器评估儿童和青少年久坐行为时间的准确性和精密度:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Aug 9;10(8):e37547. doi: 10.2196/37547.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of a movement and music programme on activity, sedentary, and sleep behaviours and motor and musical skills in young children: protocol for the MoviMusi cluster randomised controlled trial.一项运动与音乐项目对幼儿活动、久坐行为、睡眠行为以及运动和音乐技能的有效性:MoviMusi 整群随机对照试验方案
J Act Sedentary Sleep Behav. 2024 Nov 11;3(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s44167-024-00065-5.
2
Validity and reliability of the movement behaviour questionnaire child in Chinese preschoolers.中国学龄前儿童运动行为问卷的效度与信度
Front Pediatr. 2025 Mar 21;13:1544738. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1544738. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review of accelerometer-based methods for 24-h physical behavior assessment in young children (0-5 years old).基于加速度计的 0-5 岁幼儿 24 小时身体活动评估方法的系统评价。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Sep 8;19(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01296-y.
2
Measurement of screen time among young children aged 0-6 years: A systematic review.测量 0-6 岁幼儿的屏幕时间:系统评价。
Obes Rev. 2021 Aug;22(8):e13260. doi: 10.1111/obr.13260. Epub 2021 May 7.
3
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews.
Mapping Evidence on Integrated 24-Hour Movement Behaviors in Children and Adolescents: A Scoping Review of Reviews.
儿童和青少年24小时综合运动行为的证据图谱:综述的范围综述
Children (Basel). 2025 Feb 20;12(3):260. doi: 10.3390/children12030260.
4
24-hour movement behaviours in the early years, potential behavioural determinants and prospective associations with growth, motor and social-emotional development: the My Little Moves study protocol.儿童早期 24 小时活动行为、潜在行为决定因素及与生长、运动和社会情感发育的前瞻性关联:我的小举动研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 22;14(10):e081836. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081836.
5
Validity of the PROMIS Early Childhood Physical Activity Scale among toddlers.幼儿期体力活动量表(PROMIS Early Childhood Physical Activity Scale)在幼儿中的有效性。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Sep 26;21(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01655-x.
6
24-H movement behaviours research in Chinese population: A scoping review.中国人群24小时运动行为研究:一项范围综述。
J Exerc Sci Fit. 2024 Oct;22(4):397-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2024.07.005. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
7
Methodological quality of 100 recent systematic reviews of health-related outcome measurement instruments: an overview of reviews.100 篇近期健康相关结局测评工具系统评价的方法学质量:综述概览。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Oct;33(10):2593-2609. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03706-z. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
8
Tummy Time Tracking: Examining Agreement Between Parent Recall and Direct Observation in Infants.腹爬时间追踪:研究父母回忆与婴儿直接观察之间的一致性。
Am J Occup Ther. 2024 Jul 1;78(4). doi: 10.5014/ajot.2024.050521.
9
Reliability and validity of rapid assessment tools for measuring 24-hour movement behaviours in children aged 0-5 years: the Movement Behaviour Questionnaire Baby (MBQ-B) and child (MBQ-C).用于测量0至5岁儿童24小时运动行为的快速评估工具的信效度:运动行为问卷婴儿版(MBQ-B)和儿童版(MBQ-C)
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Apr 23;21(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01596-5.
10
Influence of moderate-to-high intensity physical activity on depression levels: a study based on a health survey of Chinese university students.中等及以上强度体力活动对抑郁水平的影响:基于中国大学生健康调查的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 12;24(1):1023. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18433-w.
PRISMA 2020 解释和说明:系统评价报告的更新指南和范例。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n160. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n160.
4
Physical activity and prospective associations with indicators of health and development in children aged <5 years: a systematic review.身体活动与<5 岁儿童健康和发育指标的前瞻性关联:系统评价。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Jan 7;18(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01072-w.
5
Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Instruments Measuring Children's Movement Behaviors and Parenting Practices in Brazilian Families.跨文化适应在巴西家庭中测量儿童运动行为和养育实践的工具。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 31;18(1):239. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010239.
6
Associations between parent-reported and objectively measured sleep duration and timing in infants at age 6 months.6 月龄婴儿父母报告的睡眠时间和入睡时间与客观测量值之间的关联。
Sleep. 2021 Apr 9;44(4). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsaa217.
7
Comparison Between Actigraphy Records and Parental Reports of Child's Sleep.活动记录仪记录与家长报告的儿童睡眠情况比较
Front Pediatr. 2020 Sep 24;8:567390. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.567390. eCollection 2020.
8
Exploring the Reliability and Validity of the TechU-Q to Evaluate Device and Purpose Specific Screen Use in Preschool Children and Parents.探索TechU-Q评估学龄前儿童及家长特定设备和目的屏幕使用情况的信效度。
J Child Fam Stud. 2020;29(10):2879-2889. doi: 10.1007/s10826-020-01787-1. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
9
The whole day matters: Understanding 24-hour movement guideline adherence and relationships with health indicators across the lifespan.全天都很重要:了解 24 小时运动指南的遵守情况以及与整个生命周期健康指标的关系。
J Sport Health Sci. 2020 Dec;9(6):493-510. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.07.004. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
10
Pediatric Sleep Tools: An Updated Literature Review.儿科睡眠工具:最新文献综述
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 23;11:317. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00317. eCollection 2020.