Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Sep;19(9):1117-22. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
To investigate in which way body mass index (BMI) and alignment affect the risk for knee osteoarthritis (OA) progression.
Radiographs of 181 knees from 155 patients (85% female, mean age 60 years) with radiographic signs of OA were analyzed at baseline and after 6 years. Progression was defined as 1-point increase in joint space narrowing score in the medial or lateral tibiofemoral (TF) compartment or having knee prosthesis during the follow-up for knees with a Kellgren and Lawrence score ≥ 1 at baseline. BMI at baseline was classified as normal (<25 kg/m(2)), overweight (25-30) and obese (>30). Knee alignment on baseline radiographs was categorized as normal (TF angle between 182° and 184°) and malalignment (<182° or >184°). We estimated the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval for knee OA progression for overweight and obese patients and for malaligned knees relative to normal using generalized estimating equations (GEE). Additionally, we estimated the added effect when BMI and malalignment were present together on progression of knee OA. Adjustments were made for age and sex.
Seventy-six knees (42%) showed progression: 27 in lateral and 66 in medial compartment. Knees from overweight and obese patients had an increased risk for progression (RR 2.4 (1.-3.6) and 2.9 (1.7-4.1), respectively). RRs of progression for malaligned, varus and valgus knee were 2.0 (1.3-2.8), 2.3 (1.4-3.1), and 1.7 (0.97-2.6), respectively. When BMI and malalignment were included in one model, the effect of overweight, obesity and malalignment did not change. The added effect when overweight and malalignment were present was 17%.
Overweight is associated with progression of knee OA and shows a small interaction with alignment. Losing weight might be helpful in preventing the progression of knee OA.
探讨体重指数(BMI)和关节对线方式对膝关节骨关节炎(OA)进展的影响。
对 155 例(85%为女性,平均年龄 60 岁)影像学表现有 OA 患者的 181 个膝关节进行基线和 6 年随访时的影像学分析。进展定义为内侧或外侧胫股(TF)间室关节间隙狭窄评分增加 1 分,或在基线时 Kellgren 和 Lawrence 评分≥1 的膝关节在随访期间行膝关节置换术。基线时 BMI 分为正常(<25kg/m²)、超重(25-30kg/m²)和肥胖(>30kg/m²)。基线 X 线片上的膝关节对线方式分为正常(TF 角 182°-184°)和对线不良(<182°或>184°)。采用广义估计方程(GEE)估计超重和肥胖患者以及对线不良膝关节相对于正常膝关节发生 OA 进展的风险比(RR)及其 95%置信区间。此外,还估计了当 BMI 和对线不良同时存在时对膝关节 OA 进展的附加影响。调整因素包括年龄和性别。
76 个膝关节(42%)出现进展:外侧 27 个,内侧 66 个。超重和肥胖患者发生进展的风险增加(RR 分别为 2.4(1.0-3.6)和 2.9(1.7-4.1))。对线不良、内翻和外翻膝关节的进展 RR 分别为 2.0(1.3-2.8)、2.3(1.4-3.1)和 1.7(0.97-2.6)。当 BMI 和对线不良纳入同一模型时,超重、肥胖和对线不良的作用没有改变。超重和对线不良同时存在时的附加效应为 17%。
超重与膝关节 OA 的进展相关,且与对线方式有轻度交互作用。减轻体重可能有助于预防膝关节 OA 的进展。