Department of General Practice, Department of Orthopaedics, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Department Radiology, Maasstad Hospital and Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of General Practice, Department of Orthopaedics, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Department Radiology, Maasstad Hospital and Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.Department of General Practice, Department of Orthopaedics, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Department Radiology, Maasstad Hospital and Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014 Sep;53(9):1618-24. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu141. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
The present study aims to investigate the associations between malalignment and incident knee OA after 2.5 years in a high-risk group of 333 middle-aged overweight women (BMI ≥ 27 kg/m(2)) free of clinical and radiological knee OA at baseline.
The primary outcome measure was the incidence of knee OA, defined as the incidence of radiographic knee OA (Kellgren and Lawrence grade ≥2), clinical knee OA (ACR criteria) or medial or lateral joint space narrowing (≥1.0 mm). Using generalized estimating equations, associations between valgus and varus alignment (compared with neutrally aligned knees) and the primary outcome measure and all its items separately were studied.
Neither varus- nor valgus-aligned knees had a significantly increased risk for incident knee OA according to the primary outcome measure. A significantly increased risk for the development of radiographic knee OA was found for varus-aligned knees [odds ratio (OR) 3.3, 95% CI 1.5, 7.3]. Valgus-aligned knees showed a borderline increased OR (2.8, 95% CI 1.0, 8.0) for the development of radiographic knee OA. No statistically significant effects were found for varus and valgus alignment on the incidence of clinical knee OA or medial or lateral joint space narrowing.
Since this study was performed in a true target population, current data suggest that malalignment might be a target for the prevention of radiographic knee OA in overweight and obese women.
本研究旨在探讨 333 名中年超重女性(BMI≥27kg/m2)中,2.5 年后,在存在膝关节 OA 风险的情况下,对线不良与新发膝关节 OA 的相关性。
主要终点是膝关节 OA 的发生率,定义为放射学膝关节 OA(Kellgren 和 Lawrence 分级≥2)、临床膝关节 OA(ACR 标准)或内侧或外侧关节间隙狭窄(≥1.0mm)的发生率。采用广义估计方程,研究了外翻和内翻对线(与中立对线膝关节相比)与主要终点及所有项目的相关性。
外翻或内翻对线膝关节与新发膝关节 OA 的风险均无显著相关性。外翻对线膝关节发生放射学膝关节 OA 的风险显著增加[比值比(OR)3.3,95%可信区间(CI)1.5,7.3]。内翻对线膝关节发生放射学膝关节 OA 的风险有增加的趋势(OR 2.8,95%CI 1.0,8.0)。外翻和内翻对线膝关节对临床膝关节 OA 或内侧或外侧关节间隙狭窄的发生率均无统计学意义。
由于本研究是在真正的目标人群中进行的,目前的数据表明,对线不良可能是超重和肥胖女性预防放射学膝关节 OA 的一个靶点。