Elliot Diane L, Goldberg Linn, Duncan Terry E, Kuehl Kerry S, Moe Esther L, Breger Rosemary K R, DeFrancesco Carol L, Ernst Denise B, Stevens Victor J
Division of Health Promotion & Sports Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA.
Am J Health Behav. 2004 Jan-Feb;28(1):13-23. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.28.1.2.
To assess efficacy of 2 worksite health promotion interventions.
Randomly assign 3 fire stations to (a) team-based curriculum, (b) individual counselor meetings, and (c) control.
Both interventions were feasible and acceptable, and they resulted in significant reductions in LDL cholesterol. The team approach significantly increased coworker cohesion, personal exercise habits, and coworkers' healthy behaviors. The one-on-one strategy significantly increased dietary self-monitoring, decreased fat intake, and reduced depressed feelings.
Although both interventions promoted healthy behaviors, specific outcomes differed and reflected their conceptual underpinnings. The team-based curriculum is innovative and may enlist influences not accessed with individual formats.
评估两种工作场所健康促进干预措施的效果。
将3个消防站随机分配至（a）基于团队的课程、（b）个人咨询会议和（c）对照组。
两种干预措施均可行且可接受，并且它们均使低密度脂蛋白胆固醇显著降低。团队方法显著提高了同事间的凝聚力、个人锻炼习惯以及同事的健康行为。一对一策略显著提高了饮食自我监测能力，降低了脂肪摄入量，并减轻了抑郁情绪。
尽管两种干预措施都促进了健康行为，但具体结果有所不同，反映了它们的概念基础。基于团队的课程具有创新性，可能会带来个体形式无法产生的影响。
