Suppr超能文献

语义启动和词频联合效应中的个体差异:词汇完整性的作用。

Individual differences in the joint effects of semantic priming and word frequency: The role of lexical integrity.

作者信息

Yap Melvin J, Tse Chi-Shing, Balota David A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore.

出版信息

J Mem Lang. 2009 Oct 1;61(3):303. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.07.001.

Abstract

Word frequency and semantic priming effects are among the most robust effects in visual word recognition, and it has been generally assumed that these two variables produce interactive effects in lexical decision performance, with larger priming effects for low-frequency targets. The results from four lexical decision experiments indicate that the joint effects of semantic priming and word frequency are critically dependent upon differences in the vocabulary knowledge of the participants. Specifically, across two Universities, additive effects of the two variables were observed in participants with more vocabulary knowledge, while interactive effects were observed in participants with less vocabulary knowledge. These results are discussed with reference to Borowsky and Besner's (1993) multistage account and Plaut and Booth's (2000) single-mechanism model. In general, the findings are also consistent with a flexible lexical processing system that optimizes performance based on processing fluency and task demands.

摘要

词频和语义启动效应是视觉单词识别中最稳定的效应之一,人们普遍认为这两个变量在词汇判断表现中会产生交互作用,低频目标的启动效应更大。四项词汇判断实验的结果表明,语义启动和词频的联合效应严重依赖于参与者词汇知识的差异。具体而言,在两所大学中,词汇知识较多的参与者中观察到这两个变量的相加效应,而词汇知识较少的参与者中观察到交互作用。这些结果将参照博罗夫斯基和贝斯纳(1993年)的多阶段理论以及普劳特和布斯(2000年)的单机制模型进行讨论。总体而言,这些发现也与一个灵活的词汇处理系统相一致,该系统基于处理流畅性和任务需求来优化表现。

相似文献

2
Parallel distributed processing and lexical-semantic effects in visual word recognition: are a few stages necessary?
Psychol Rev. 2006 Jan;113(1):181-95; discussion 196-200. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.1.181.
4
Semantic processing in visual word recognition: activation blocking and domain specificity.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Dec;8(4):778-84. doi: 10.3758/bf03196217.
5
Additive and interactive effects in semantic priming: Isolating lexical and decision processes in the lexical decision task.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Jan;39(1):140-58. doi: 10.1037/a0028520. Epub 2012 May 21.
6
Exploring the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency: the influence of local and list-wide prime relatedness.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(1):91-107. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.698628. Epub 2012 Aug 21.
7
How semantic is automatic semantic priming?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992 Nov;18(6):1191-210. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.18.6.1191.
8
Interactive activation in visual word recognition: constraints imposed by the joint effects of spatial attention and semantics.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Dec;30(6):1064-76. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.6.1064.
9
Semantic priming in visual word recognition: Activation blocking and domains of processing.
Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Jun;3(2):249-53. doi: 10.3758/BF03212427.
10
The time course of semantic ambiguity in visual word recognition: behavioral and ERP evidence for the lexical-semantic effect.
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 9;15:1378125. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1378125. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

4
CCLOOW: Chinese children's lexicon of oral words.
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Feb;56(2):846-859. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02077-6. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
6
CLAD: A corpus-derived Chinese Lexical Association Database.
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Oct;51(5):2310-2336. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01208-2.
7
Extending the Simple View of Reading to Account for Variation Within Readers and Across Texts: The Complete View of Reading (CVR).
Remedial Spec Educ. 2018 Sep;39(5):274-288. doi: 10.1177/0741932518772904. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
8
9
The onset and time course of semantic priming during rapid recognition of visual words.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 May;43(5):881-902. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000377. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
10
Print exposure modulates the effects of repetition priming during sentence reading.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Dec;24(6):1935-1942. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1248-1.

本文引用的文献

1
The evidence for a temporal processing deficit linked to dyslexia: A review.
Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Dec;2(4):460-93. doi: 10.3758/BF03210983.
2
Dynamics of the attentional control of word retrieval: analyses of response time distributions.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 May;137(2):303-23. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.303.
4
Constraints on computational models of basic processes in reading.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Feb;34(1):242-50. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.242.
6
The English Lexicon Project.
Behav Res Methods. 2007 Aug;39(3):445-59. doi: 10.3758/bf03193014.
7
Attentional control and the relatedness proportion effect in semantic priming.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Jul;33(4):645-62. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.645.
8
Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Mar;33(2):274-96. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.274.
10
Single- versus dual-process models of lexical decision performance: insights from response time distributional analysis.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Dec;32(6):1324-44. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1324.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验