• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Individual differences in the joint effects of semantic priming and word frequency: The role of lexical integrity.语义启动和词频联合效应中的个体差异:词汇完整性的作用。
J Mem Lang. 2009 Oct 1;61(3):303. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.07.001.
2
Parallel distributed processing and lexical-semantic effects in visual word recognition: are a few stages necessary?视觉单词识别中的并行分布式处理和词汇语义效应:需要几个阶段?
Psychol Rev. 2006 Jan;113(1):181-95; discussion 196-200. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.1.181.
3
The influence of relatedness proportion on the joint relationship among word frequency, stimulus quality, and semantic priming in the lexical decision task.在词汇判断任务中,亲属关系比例对词频、刺激质量和语义启动之间联合关系的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Oct;72(10):2452-2461. doi: 10.1177/1747021819845317. Epub 2019 Apr 28.
4
Semantic processing in visual word recognition: activation blocking and domain specificity.视觉单词识别中的语义处理:激活阻断与领域特异性
Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Dec;8(4):778-84. doi: 10.3758/bf03196217.
5
Additive and interactive effects in semantic priming: Isolating lexical and decision processes in the lexical decision task.语义启动中的附加和交互效应:在词汇判断任务中分离词汇和决策过程。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Jan;39(1):140-58. doi: 10.1037/a0028520. Epub 2012 May 21.
6
Exploring the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency: the influence of local and list-wide prime relatedness.探究刺激质量和词频的累加效应:局部和列表范围内启动词相关性的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(1):91-107. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.698628. Epub 2012 Aug 21.
7
How semantic is automatic semantic priming?自动语义启动的语义程度如何?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992 Nov;18(6):1191-210. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.18.6.1191.
8
Interactive activation in visual word recognition: constraints imposed by the joint effects of spatial attention and semantics.视觉单词识别中的交互激活:空间注意力和语义的联合效应所施加的限制
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Dec;30(6):1064-76. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.6.1064.
9
Semantic priming in visual word recognition: Activation blocking and domains of processing.视觉词汇识别中的语义启动:激活阻断与加工领域。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Jun;3(2):249-53. doi: 10.3758/BF03212427.
10
The time course of semantic ambiguity in visual word recognition: behavioral and ERP evidence for the lexical-semantic effect.视觉单词识别中语义歧义的时间进程:词汇 - 语义效应的行为学和事件相关电位证据
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 9;15:1378125. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1378125. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
The German Auditory and Image (GAudI) vocabulary test: A new German receptive vocabulary test and its relationships to other tests measuring linguistic experience.德国听觉与图像(GAudI)词汇测试:一项新的德语接受性词汇测试及其与其他衡量语言经验的测试之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 28;20(4):e0318115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318115. eCollection 2025.
2
The Slow Development of Real-Time Processing: Spoken-Word Recognition as a Crucible for New Thinking About Language Acquisition and Language Disorders.实时处理的缓慢发展:口语单词识别作为语言习得和语言障碍新思维的熔炉
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2022 Aug;31(4):305-315. doi: 10.1177/09637214221078325. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
3
Visual Motor Reaction Times Predict Receptive and Expressive Language Development in Early School-Age Children.视觉运动反应时间可预测学龄儿童早期的接受性和表达性语言发展。
Brain Sci. 2023 Jun 19;13(6):965. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13060965.
4
CCLOOW: Chinese children's lexicon of oral words.儿童汉语词汇表
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Feb;56(2):846-859. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02077-6. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
5
The influence of oral vocabulary knowledge on individual differences in a computational model of reading.口语词汇知识对阅读计算模型中个体差异的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 30;13(1):1680. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28559-3.
6
CLAD: A corpus-derived Chinese Lexical Association Database.CLAD:基于语料库的汉语词汇联想数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Oct;51(5):2310-2336. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01208-2.
7
Extending the Simple View of Reading to Account for Variation Within Readers and Across Texts: The Complete View of Reading (CVR).将阅读的简单观点扩展以解释读者内部和文本之间的差异:阅读的完整观点(CVR)。
Remedial Spec Educ. 2018 Sep;39(5):274-288. doi: 10.1177/0741932518772904. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
8
Vocabulary Knowledge Predicts Lexical Processing: Evidence from a Group of Participants with Diverse Educational Backgrounds.词汇知识可预测词汇处理:来自一群具有不同教育背景参与者的证据。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 13;8:1164. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01164. eCollection 2017.
9
The onset and time course of semantic priming during rapid recognition of visual words.视觉单词快速识别过程中语义启动的起始与时间进程。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 May;43(5):881-902. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000377. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
10
Print exposure modulates the effects of repetition priming during sentence reading.印刷曝光调节句子阅读中重复启动的效果。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Dec;24(6):1935-1942. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1248-1.

本文引用的文献

1
The evidence for a temporal processing deficit linked to dyslexia: A review.与阅读障碍有关的时间加工缺陷的证据:综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Dec;2(4):460-93. doi: 10.3758/BF03210983.
2
Dynamics of the attentional control of word retrieval: analyses of response time distributions.词汇检索的注意控制动态:反应时间分布分析
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 May;137(2):303-23. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.303.
3
On the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in lexical decision: evidence for opposing interactive influences revealed by RT distributional analyses.关于词汇判断中刺激质量和词频的相加效应:反应时分布分析揭示的相反交互影响的证据
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 May;34(3):495-513. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.495.
4
Constraints on computational models of basic processes in reading.阅读基本过程计算模型的限制因素。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Feb;34(1):242-50. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.242.
5
Semantic priming from letter-searched primes occurs for low- but not high-frequency targets: automatic semantic access may not be a myth.来自字母搜索启动项的语义启动效应在低频目标词上出现,而在高频目标词上不出现:自动语义通达可能并非虚构。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Nov;33(6):1143-61. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.1143.
6
The English Lexicon Project.英语词汇项目
Behav Res Methods. 2007 Aug;39(3):445-59. doi: 10.3758/bf03193014.
7
Attentional control and the relatedness proportion effect in semantic priming.注意控制与语义启动中的关联性比例效应
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Jul;33(4):645-62. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.645.
8
Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition.视觉单词识别中反应时间分布的相加和交互作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Mar;33(2):274-96. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.274.
9
Additive and interactive effects of word frequency and masked repetition in the lexical decision task.词汇判断任务中词频和掩蔽重复的相加效应与交互效应。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Aug;13(4):668-73. doi: 10.3758/bf03193979.
10
Single- versus dual-process models of lexical decision performance: insights from response time distributional analysis.词汇判断表现的单进程与双进程模型:来自反应时间分布分析的见解
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Dec;32(6):1324-44. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1324.

语义启动和词频联合效应中的个体差异:词汇完整性的作用。

Individual differences in the joint effects of semantic priming and word frequency: The role of lexical integrity.

作者信息

Yap Melvin J, Tse Chi-Shing, Balota David A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore.

出版信息

J Mem Lang. 2009 Oct 1;61(3):303. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.07.001.

DOI:10.1016/j.jml.2009.07.001
PMID:20161653
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2818444/
Abstract

Word frequency and semantic priming effects are among the most robust effects in visual word recognition, and it has been generally assumed that these two variables produce interactive effects in lexical decision performance, with larger priming effects for low-frequency targets. The results from four lexical decision experiments indicate that the joint effects of semantic priming and word frequency are critically dependent upon differences in the vocabulary knowledge of the participants. Specifically, across two Universities, additive effects of the two variables were observed in participants with more vocabulary knowledge, while interactive effects were observed in participants with less vocabulary knowledge. These results are discussed with reference to Borowsky and Besner's (1993) multistage account and Plaut and Booth's (2000) single-mechanism model. In general, the findings are also consistent with a flexible lexical processing system that optimizes performance based on processing fluency and task demands.

摘要

词频和语义启动效应是视觉单词识别中最稳定的效应之一,人们普遍认为这两个变量在词汇判断表现中会产生交互作用,低频目标的启动效应更大。四项词汇判断实验的结果表明,语义启动和词频的联合效应严重依赖于参与者词汇知识的差异。具体而言,在两所大学中,词汇知识较多的参与者中观察到这两个变量的相加效应,而词汇知识较少的参与者中观察到交互作用。这些结果将参照博罗夫斯基和贝斯纳(1993年)的多阶段理论以及普劳特和布斯(2000年)的单机制模型进行讨论。总体而言,这些发现也与一个灵活的词汇处理系统相一致,该系统基于处理流畅性和任务需求来优化表现。