Suppr超能文献

臀位分娩方式的婴儿的胎儿结局:资深产科医生待命服务系统的经验及产妇对分娩方式的选择。

Fetal outcome for infants in breech by method of delivery: experiences with a stand-by service system of senior obstetricians and women's choices of mode of delivery.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.

出版信息

J Perinat Med. 2011 Jul;39(4):385-90. doi: 10.1515/jpm.2011.044.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To show that the fetal outcome in vaginal deliveries (VD) of breech presentation in a setting of a senior obstetrician stand-by system is as good as in planned cesarean sections.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This observational prospective intent-to-treat study (n=211 singleton breech presentation pregnancies of ≥35 weeks of gestation) compared two groups of breech deliveries: planned cesarean sections (PCS, n=126) and intended VD (IVD, n=85) resulting in vaginal deliveries (VD, n=46) as well as secondary cesarean sections (SCS, n=39). Women's informed choice as well as strict pre-selection criteria for vaginally intended breech presentation deliveries was followed.

RESULTS

Fetal outcome of vaginal breech deliveries and of primary as well as SCS (45.9% of IVD) was comparable in terms of cord blood pH, base excess, Apgar score, fetal trauma, and transfer to neonatal intensive care unit.

CONCLUSIONS

Vaginal breech delivery is a safe option in a stand-by system of senior obstetricians with controlled decision-making before labor.

摘要

目的

展示在有资深产科医生待命的情况下,臀位阴道分娩(VD)的胎儿结局与计划性剖宫产(PCS)一样好。

患者和方法

这是一项观察性、前瞻性意向治疗研究(n=211 例≥35 周妊娠的单胎臀位分娩),比较了两组臀位分娩:计划性剖宫产(PCS,n=126)和意向性 VD(IVD,n=85),最终阴道分娩(VD,n=46)以及继发性剖宫产(SCS,n=39)。遵循了产妇知情选择以及严格的阴道分娩意向臀位分娩的预筛选标准。

结果

阴道分娩臀位分娩以及原发性和 SCS(IVD 的 45.9%)的胎儿结局在脐血 pH 值、碱剩余、阿普加评分、胎儿创伤以及转入新生儿重症监护病房方面相似。

结论

在资深产科医生待命的情况下,阴道分娩臀位是一种安全的选择,在分娩前可以进行控制决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验