• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

INVESTIGATE-I(手术治疗失禁前的侵入性评估是否增加治疗效果?):一项混合方法研究的研究方案,旨在评估未来对侵入性尿动力学测试临床效用的随机对照试验的可行性。

INVESTIGATE-I (INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?): study protocol for a mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of the clinical utility of invasive urodynamic testing.

机构信息

Directorate of Women's Services, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2011 Jul 6;12:169. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-169.

DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-12-169
PMID:21733166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3152523/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Urinary incontinence is an important health problem to the individual sufferer and to health services. Stress and stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence are increasingly managed by surgery due to advances in surgical techniques. Despite the lack of evidence for its clinical utility, most clinicians undertake invasive urodynamic testing (IUT) to confirm a functional diagnosis of urodynamic stress incontinence before offering surgery for this condition. IUT is expensive, embarrassing and uncomfortable for women and carries a small risk. Recent systematic reviews have confirmed the lack of high quality evidence of effectiveness.The aim of this pilot study is to test the feasibility of a future definitive randomised control trial that would address whether IUT alters treatment decisions and treatment outcome in these women and would test its clinical and cost effectiveness.

METHODS/DESIGN: This is a mixed methods pragmatic multicentre feasibility pilot study with four components:-(a) A multicentre, external pilot randomised trial comparing basic clinical assessment with non-invasive tests and IUT. The outcome measures are rates of recruitment, randomisation and data completion. Data will be used to estimate sample size necessary for the definitive trial.(b) Qualitative interviews of a purposively sampled sub-set of women eligible for the pilot trial will explore willingness to participate, be randomised and their overall trial experience.(c) A national survey of clinicians to determine their views of IUT in this context, the main outcome being their willingness to randomise patients into the definitive trial.(d) Qualitative interviews of a purposively sampled group of these clinicians will explore whether and how they use IUT to inform their decisions.

DISCUSSION

The pilot trial will provide evidence of feasibility and acceptability and therefore inform the decision whether to proceed to the definitive trial. Results will inform the design and conduct of the definitive trial and ensure its effectiveness in achieving its research aim.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN71327395 assigned 7th June 2010.

摘要

背景

尿失禁对患者个人和医疗服务机构而言都是一个重要的健康问题。由于手术技术的进步,压力性和以压力为主的混合性尿失禁越来越多地通过手术来治疗。尽管缺乏其临床应用的证据,但大多数临床医生在为这种疾病提供手术治疗之前,会通过侵入性尿动力学测试(IUT)来确认尿动力学压力性尿失禁的功能诊断。IUT 既昂贵又令女性感到尴尬和不适,而且存在一定的风险。最近的系统评价证实了缺乏高质量的有效性证据。本研究旨在测试未来确定性随机对照试验的可行性,该试验将解决 IUT 是否会改变这些女性的治疗决策和治疗结果,并测试其临床和成本效益。

方法/设计:这是一项混合方法实用多中心可行性先导研究,包括四个部分:(a)一项多中心外部先导随机试验,比较基本临床评估与非侵入性测试和 IUT。主要结局指标是招募率、随机分组率和数据完成率。数据将用于估计确定性试验所需的样本量。(b)对符合试验条件的女性进行有针对性的亚组定性访谈,以探讨其参与、随机分组和总体试验体验的意愿。(c)对临床医生进行全国性调查,以确定他们在这种情况下对 IUT 的看法,主要结局是他们是否愿意将患者随机分配到确定性试验中。(d)对这些临床医生进行有针对性的小组定性访谈,以探讨他们是否以及如何使用 IUT 来为其决策提供信息。

讨论

先导试验将提供可行性和可接受性的证据,从而为是否进行确定性试验做出决策。结果将为确定性试验的设计和实施提供信息,并确保其在实现研究目标方面的有效性。

试验注册

当前对照试验 ISRCTN71327395 于 2010 年 6 月 7 日注册。

相似文献

1
INVESTIGATE-I (INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?): study protocol for a mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of the clinical utility of invasive urodynamic testing.INVESTIGATE-I(手术治疗失禁前的侵入性评估是否增加治疗效果?):一项混合方法研究的研究方案,旨在评估未来对侵入性尿动力学测试临床效用的随机对照试验的可行性。
Trials. 2011 Jul 6;12:169. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-169.
2
INVESTIGATE-I (INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?): a mixed-methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of invasive urodynamic testing prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women.INVESTIGATE - I(尿失禁手术治疗前的侵入性评估是否能带来额外治疗效果?):一项混合方法研究,旨在评估未来针对女性压力性尿失禁手术前进行侵入性尿动力学检测的随机对照试验的可行性。
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Feb;19(15):1-273, vii-viii. doi: 10.3310/hta19150.
3
A mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of invasive urodynamic testing versus clinical assessment and non-invasive tests prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: the INVESTIGATE-I study.一项混合方法研究,旨在评估针对女性压力性尿失禁患者在手术前进行侵入性尿动力学测试与临床评估及非侵入性测试的随机对照试验的可行性:INVESTIGATE-I研究。
Trials. 2015 Sep 8;16:400. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0928-2.
4
Assessing professional equipoise and views about a future clinical trial of invasive urodynamics prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: a survey within a mixed methods feasibility study.评估女性压力性尿失禁手术前侵入性尿动力学未来临床试验的专业平衡和观点:一项混合方法可行性研究中的调查。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2012 Nov;31(8):1223-30. doi: 10.1002/nau.22328. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
5
Invasive urodynamic testing prior to surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence in women: cost-effectiveness and value of information analyses in the context of a mixed methods feasibility study.女性压力性尿失禁手术治疗前的侵入性尿动力学检测:混合方法可行性研究背景下的成本效益与信息价值分析
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Mar 23;4:67. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0255-y. eCollection 2018.
6
Synthetic sling or artificial urinary sphincter for men with urodynamic stress incontinence after prostate surgery: the MASTER non-inferiority RCT.前列腺手术后尿动力学压力性尿失禁男性患者使用合成吊带或人工尿道括约肌:MASTER 非劣效 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Aug;26(36):1-152. doi: 10.3310/TBFZ0277.
7
Understanding variations in patient screening and recruitment in a multicentre pilot randomised controlled trial: a vignette-based study.在一项多中心试点随机对照试验中理解患者筛查与招募的差异:一项基于案例的研究。
Trials. 2016 Oct 26;17(1):522. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1652-2.
8
Urodynamics tests for the diagnosis and management of bladder outlet obstruction in men: the UPSTREAM non-inferiority RCT.尿动力学检查在男性膀胱出口梗阻诊断和治疗中的应用:UPSTREAM 非劣效 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(42):1-122. doi: 10.3310/hta24420.
9
Urodynamic studies for management of urinary incontinence in children and adults.用于儿童和成人尿失禁管理的尿动力学研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 29;2013(10):CD003195. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003195.pub3.
10
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of arthroscopic lavage in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a mixed methods study of the feasibility of conducting a surgical placebo-controlled trial (the KORAL study).关节镜灌洗术治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效和成本效益:一项关于开展手术安慰剂对照试验(KORAL 研究)可行性的混合方法研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jan;14(5):1-180. doi: 10.3310/hta14040.

引用本文的文献

1
Open urethroplasty versus endoscopic urethrotomy for recurrent urethral stricture in men: the OPEN RCT.男性复发性尿道狭窄的尿道切开术与开放尿道成形术的比较:OPEN RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(61):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta24610.
2
Invasive urodynamic testing prior to surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence in women: cost-effectiveness and value of information analyses in the context of a mixed methods feasibility study.女性压力性尿失禁手术治疗前的侵入性尿动力学检测:混合方法可行性研究背景下的成本效益与信息价值分析
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Mar 23;4:67. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0255-y. eCollection 2018.
3
Understanding variations in patient screening and recruitment in a multicentre pilot randomised controlled trial: a vignette-based study.在一项多中心试点随机对照试验中理解患者筛查与招募的差异:一项基于案例的研究。
Trials. 2016 Oct 26;17(1):522. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1652-2.
4
Trial participation as avoidance strategy: a qualitative study.将参与试验作为回避策略:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2016 Dec;19(6):1346-1354. doi: 10.1111/hex.12437. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
5
A mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of invasive urodynamic testing versus clinical assessment and non-invasive tests prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: the INVESTIGATE-I study.一项混合方法研究,旨在评估针对女性压力性尿失禁患者在手术前进行侵入性尿动力学测试与临床评估及非侵入性测试的随机对照试验的可行性:INVESTIGATE-I研究。
Trials. 2015 Sep 8;16:400. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0928-2.
6
Urogynecology digest Presented by Aparna Hegde.《泌尿妇科文摘》 由阿帕娜·赫格德主编
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 May;26(5):765-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2605-5.
7
Urodynamic studies for management of urinary incontinence in children and adults.用于儿童和成人尿失禁管理的尿动力学研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 29;2013(10):CD003195. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003195.pub3.
8
Assessing professional equipoise and views about a future clinical trial of invasive urodynamics prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: a survey within a mixed methods feasibility study.评估女性压力性尿失禁手术前侵入性尿动力学未来临床试验的专业平衡和观点:一项混合方法可行性研究中的调查。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2012 Nov;31(8):1223-30. doi: 10.1002/nau.22328. Epub 2012 Sep 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinicians' views on the feasibility of surgical randomized trials in urogynecology: results of a questionnaire survey.临床医生对尿失禁外科随机试验可行性的看法:问卷调查结果。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Jan;30(1):69-74. doi: 10.1002/nau.20943. Epub 2010 Jul 23.
2
Prioritizing research: Patients, carers, and clinicians working together to identify and prioritize important clinical uncertainties in urinary incontinence.优先研究:患者、照顾者和临床医生共同合作,确定和优先考虑尿失禁的重要临床不确定性。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2010 Jun;29(5):708-14. doi: 10.1002/nau.20816.
3
Design of the Value of Urodynamic Evaluation (ValUE) trial: A non-inferiority randomized trial of preoperative urodynamic investigations.《尿动力学评估价值(ValUE)试验设计:术前尿动力学研究的非劣效性随机试验》
Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 Nov;30(6):531-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2009.07.001. Epub 2009 Jul 25.
4
Protocol for the value of urodynamics prior to stress incontinence surgery (VUSIS) study: a multicenter randomized controlled trial to assess the cost effectiveness of urodynamics in women with symptoms of stress urinary incontinence in whom surgical treatment is considered.压力性尿失禁手术前尿动力学评估价值(VUSIS)研究方案:一项多中心随机对照试验,旨在评估尿动力学检查对考虑手术治疗的压力性尿失禁女性患者的成本效益。
BMC Womens Health. 2009 Jul 21;9:22. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-9-22.
5
A randomized controlled trial of pelvic floor muscle training for stages I and II pelvic organ prolapse.针对I期和II期盆腔器官脱垂的盆底肌训练随机对照试验。
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Jan;20(1):45-51. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0726-4. Epub 2008 Sep 20.
6
Tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: 5-year follow up.经阴道无张力尿道中段吊带术与膀胱颈悬吊术治疗原发性尿动力学压力性尿失禁的5年随访
BJOG. 2008 Jan;115(2):226-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01548.x. Epub 2007 Oct 25.
7
Why, and how, mixed methods research is undertaken in health services research in England: a mixed methods study.为何以及如何在英格兰的卫生服务研究中开展混合方法研究:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Jun 14;7:85. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-85.
8
Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires.提高邮寄问卷调查回复率的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18(2):MR000008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub3.
9
Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension--results of a prospective randomised controlled trial.腹腔镜与开放式阴道悬吊术——一项前瞻性随机对照试验的结果
BJOG. 2006 Sep;113(9):1007-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01035.x.
10
Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence.尿失禁评估方法的系统评价与评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Feb;10(6):1-132, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10060.