Suppr超能文献

为何以及如何在英格兰的卫生服务研究中开展混合方法研究:一项混合方法研究。

Why, and how, mixed methods research is undertaken in health services research in England: a mixed methods study.

作者信息

O'Cathain Alicia, Murphy Elizabeth, Nicholl Jon

机构信息

Medical Care Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Jun 14;7:85. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-85.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recently, there has been a surge of international interest in combining qualitative and quantitative methods in a single study--often called mixed methods research. It is timely to consider why and how mixed methods research is used in health services research (HSR).

METHODS

Documentary analysis of proposals and reports of 75 mixed methods studies funded by a research commissioner of HSR in England between 1994 and 2004. Face-to-face semi-structured interviews with 20 researchers sampled from these studies.

RESULTS

18% (119/647) of HSR studies were classified as mixed methods research. In the documentation, comprehensiveness was the main driver for using mixed methods research, with researchers wanting to address a wider range of questions than quantitative methods alone would allow. Interviewees elaborated on this, identifying the need for qualitative research to engage with the complexity of health, health care interventions, and the environment in which studies took place. Motivations for adopting a mixed methods approach were not always based on the intrinsic value of mixed methods research for addressing the research question; they could be strategic, for example, to obtain funding. Mixed methods research was used in the context of evaluation, including randomised and non-randomised designs; survey and fieldwork exploratory studies; and instrument development. Studies drew on a limited number of methods--particularly surveys and individual interviews--but used methods in a wide range of roles.

CONCLUSION

Mixed methods research is common in HSR in the UK. Its use is driven by pragmatism rather than principle, motivated by the perceived deficit of quantitative methods alone to address the complexity of research in health care, as well as other more strategic gains. Methods are combined in a range of contexts, yet the emerging methodological contributions from HSR to the field of mixed methods research are currently limited to the single context of combining qualitative methods and randomised controlled trials. Health services researchers could further contribute to the development of mixed methods research in the contexts of instrument development, survey and fieldwork, and non-randomised evaluations.

摘要

背景

最近,国际上对在一项研究中结合定性和定量方法(通常称为混合方法研究)的兴趣激增。现在是时候思考为什么以及如何在卫生服务研究(HSR)中使用混合方法研究了。

方法

对1994年至2004年间由英国HSR研究资助机构资助的75项混合方法研究的提案和报告进行文献分析。对从这些研究中抽取的20名研究人员进行面对面的半结构化访谈。

结果

18%(119/647)的HSR研究被归类为混合方法研究。在文献中,全面性是使用混合方法研究的主要驱动力,研究人员希望解决比单纯定量方法所能涵盖的更广泛的问题。受访者对此进行了详细阐述,指出需要定性研究来应对健康、医疗保健干预措施以及研究开展环境的复杂性。采用混合方法的动机并不总是基于混合方法研究对于解决研究问题的内在价值;它们可能是战略性的,例如为了获得资金。混合方法研究用于评估背景下,包括随机和非随机设计;调查和实地探索性研究;以及工具开发。研究采用的方法数量有限——特别是调查和个人访谈——但这些方法发挥了广泛的作用。

结论

混合方法研究在英国的HSR中很常见。其使用是由实用主义而非原则驱动的,一方面是因为人们认为仅靠定量方法不足以应对医疗保健研究的复杂性,另一方面也是出于其他更具战略性的收益。方法在一系列背景下结合使用,但目前HSR对混合方法研究领域新出现的方法学贡献仅限于定性方法与随机对照试验相结合这一单一背景。卫生服务研究人员可以在工具开发、调查和实地研究以及非随机评估背景下,进一步为混合方法研究的发展做出贡献。

相似文献

2
Women's Health Hubs: a rapid mixed-methods evaluation.妇女健康中心:快速混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(30):1-138. doi: 10.3310/JYFT5036.
3
The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research.卫生服务研究中混合方法研究的质量。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008 Apr;13(2):92-8. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007074.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验