Arrighi Roberto, Lunardi Roy, Burr David
Facoltà di Psicologia, Università degli Studi di Firenze Firenze, Italy.
Front Psychol. 2011 Apr 5;2:56. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00056. eCollection 2011.
Our perceptual capacities are limited by attentional resources. One important question is whether these resources are allocated separately to each sense or shared between them. We addressed this issue by asking subjects to perform a double task, either in the same modality or in different modalities (vision and audition). The primary task was a multiple object-tracking task (Pylyshyn and Storm, 1988), in which observers were required to track between 2 and 5 dots for 4 s. Concurrently, they were required to identify either which out of three gratings spaced over the interval differed in contrast or, in the auditory version of the same task, which tone differed in frequency relative to the two reference tones. The results show that while the concurrent visual contrast discrimination reduced tracking ability by about 0.7 d', the concurrent auditory task had virtually no effect. This confirms previous reports that vision and audition use separate attentional resources, consistent with fMRI findings of attentional effects as early as V1 and A1. The results have clear implications for effective design of instrumentation and forms of audio-visual communication devices.
我们的感知能力受到注意力资源的限制。一个重要的问题是,这些资源是分别分配给每种感官,还是在它们之间共享。我们通过要求受试者执行双重任务来解决这个问题,任务要么在同一模态下进行,要么在不同模态下进行(视觉和听觉)。主要任务是多目标跟踪任务(Pylyshyn和Storm,1988),在该任务中,观察者需要在4秒内跟踪2到5个点。同时,他们需要识别在该时间间隔内间隔排列的三个光栅中哪一个在对比度上有所不同,或者在同一任务的听觉版本中,相对于两个参考音调,哪个音调在频率上有所不同。结果表明,虽然同时进行的视觉对比度辨别使跟踪能力降低了约0.7 d',但同时进行的听觉任务几乎没有影响。这证实了先前的报道,即视觉和听觉使用不同的注意力资源,这与早在V1和A1区域就发现的注意力效应的功能磁共振成像结果一致。这些结果对仪器的有效设计以及视听通信设备的形式具有明确的启示。