• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

毒理学关注阈值值用于工业化学品的非遗传毒性效应:克拉默分类的再评价。

Threshold of toxicological concern values for non-genotoxic effects in industrial chemicals: re-evaluation of the Cramer classification.

机构信息

Institute for Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Toxicol. 2012 Jan;86(1):17-25. doi: 10.1007/s00204-011-0732-z. Epub 2011 Jul 7.

DOI:10.1007/s00204-011-0732-z
PMID:21735231
Abstract

The TTC concept employs available data from animal testing to derive a distribution of NOAELs. Taking a probabilistic view, the 5th percentile of the distribution is taken as a threshold value for toxicity. In this paper, we use 824 NOAELs from repeated dose toxicity studies of industrial chemicals to re-evaluate the currently employed TTC values, which have been derived for substances grouped according to the Cramer scheme (Cramer et al. in Food Cosm Toxicol 16:255-276, 1978) by Munro et al. (Food Chem Toxicol 34:829-867, 1996) and refined by Kroes and Kozianowski (Toxicol Lett 127:43-46, 2002), Kroes et al. 2000. In our data set, consisting of 756 NOAELs from 28-day repeated dose testing and 57 NOAELs from 90-days repeated dose testing, the experimental NOAEL had to be extrapolated to chronic TTC using regulatory accepted extrapolation factors. The TTC values derived from our data set were higher than the currently used TTC values confirming the safety of the latter. We analysed the prediction of the Cramer classification by comparing the classification by this tool with the guidance values for classification according to the Globally Harmonised System of classification and labelling of the United Nations (GHS). Nearly 90% of the chemicals were in Cramer class 3 and assumed as highly toxic compared to 22% according to the GHS. The Cramer classification does underestimate the toxicity of chemicals only in 4.6% of the cases. Hence, from a regulatory perspective, the Cramer classification scheme might be applied as it overestimates hazard of a chemical.

摘要

TTC 概念利用动物测试的可用数据来推导出无可见不良作用水平(NOAEL)的分布。从概率的角度来看,分布的第 5 个百分位数被视为毒性的阈值。在本文中,我们使用了 824 个来自工业化学品重复剂量毒性研究的 NOAEL,重新评估了目前使用的 TTC 值,这些值是由 Munro 等人根据 Cramer 方案(Cramer 等人,1978 年,食品化学毒物学 16:255-276)对物质进行分组而得出的(食品化学毒物学 34:829-867,1996 年),并由 Kroes 和 Kozianowski(毒理学快报 127:43-46,2002 年),Kroes 等人进行了改进。在我们的数据集中,包括 28 天重复剂量测试的 756 个 NOAEL 和 90 天重复剂量测试的 57 个 NOAEL,实验性 NOAEL 必须使用监管部门接受的外推因子外推到慢性 TTC。从我们的数据集中得出的 TTC 值高于目前使用的 TTC 值,证实了后者的安全性。我们通过将该工具的分类与联合国全球统一分类标签制度(GHS)的分类指导值进行比较,分析了 Cramer 分类的预测。近 90%的化学品属于 Cramer 第 3 类,与 GHS 相比,被认为是高度有毒的,占 22%。只有 4.6%的情况下,Cramer 分类法低估了化学品的毒性。因此,从监管的角度来看,Cramer 分类方案可以应用,因为它高估了化学品的危害。

相似文献

1
Threshold of toxicological concern values for non-genotoxic effects in industrial chemicals: re-evaluation of the Cramer classification.毒理学关注阈值值用于工业化学品的非遗传毒性效应:克拉默分类的再评价。
Arch Toxicol. 2012 Jan;86(1):17-25. doi: 10.1007/s00204-011-0732-z. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
2
Evaluation of inhalation TTC values with the database RepDose.评估吸入 TTC 值与 RepDose 数据库。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010 Nov;58(2):259-74. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.06.009. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
3
Improvement of the Cramer classification for oral exposure using the database TTC RepDose--a strategy description.利用 TTC RepDose 数据库改进口腔暴露的 Cramer 分类——策略描述。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011 Dec;61(3):340-50. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.09.005. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
4
Correlation of chemical structure with reproductive and developmental toxicity as it relates to the use of the threshold of toxicological concern.化学结构与生殖和发育毒性的相关性,以及与毒理学关注阈值的使用有关。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2012 Feb;62(1):160-82. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
5
Bolstering the existing database supporting the non-cancer Threshold of Toxicological Concern values with toxicity data on fragrance-related materials.用与香料相关的物质的毒性数据来支持现有的非癌症毒理学关注阈值的现有数据库。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020 Oct;116:104718. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104718. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
6
Inhalation TTC values: A new integrative grouping approach considering structural, toxicological and mechanistic features.吸入性经皮毒性值:一种考虑结构、毒理学和作用机制特征的新型综合分组方法。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016 Jul;78:8-23. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.03.022. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
7
Internal threshold of toxicological concern values: enabling route-to-route extrapolation.毒理学关注阈值:实现不同暴露途径间的外推
Arch Toxicol. 2015 Jun;89(6):941-8. doi: 10.1007/s00204-014-1287-6. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
8
Testing the thresholds of toxicological concern values using a new database for food-related substances.利用新的食品相关物质数据库测试毒理学关注阈值。
Toxicol Lett. 2019 Oct 10;314:117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2019.07.019. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
9
Reliability of the TTC approach: learning from inclusion of pesticide active substances in the supporting database.TTC方法的可靠性:从支持数据库中纳入农药活性物质中汲取经验。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2015 Jan;75:24-38. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2014.10.016. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
10
Comparison of threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) values to oral reference dose (RfD) values.毒理学关注阈值(TTC)值与口服参考剂量(RfD)值的比较。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020 Jun;113:104651. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104651. Epub 2020 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Focusing Points on FSCJ's Guideline Recently Established: Risk Assessment of Food Contact Materials.近期制定的FSCJ指南要点:食品接触材料的风险评估
Food Saf (Tokyo). 2022 Jun 24;10(2):57-69. doi: 10.14252/foodsafetyfscj.D-21-00029. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Development of a New Threshold of Toxicological Concern Database of Non-cancer Toxicity Endpoints for Industrial Chemicals.工业化学品非致癌毒性终点毒理学关注新阈值数据库的开发。
Front Toxicol. 2021 Mar 23;3:626543. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2021.626543. eCollection 2021.
3
A Summary Report of FSCJ Workshop "Future Challenges and Opportunities in Developing Methodologies for Improved Human Risk Assessments".
佛罗里达州南区学院杰克逊维尔分校研讨会“改进人类风险评估方法开发中的未来挑战与机遇”总结报告
Food Saf (Tokyo). 2019 Nov 22;7(4):83-89. doi: 10.14252/foodsafetyfscj.2018017. eCollection 2019 Dec.
4
Evaluating potential refinements to existing Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) values for environmentally-relevant compounds.评估现有毒理学关注阈值 (TTC) 值在环境相关化合物方面的潜在改进。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Dec;109:104505. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.104505. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
5
Innovative Strategies to Develop Chemical Categories Using a Combination of Structural and Toxicological Properties.结合结构和毒理学特性开发化学类别的创新策略。
Front Pharmacol. 2016 Sep 21;7:321. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00321. eCollection 2016.
6
Concepts of predictive toxicology.预测毒理学的概念。
EXCLI J. 2014 Dec 18;13:1292-4. eCollection 2014.