• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

佛罗里达州南区学院杰克逊维尔分校研讨会“改进人类风险评估方法开发中的未来挑战与机遇”总结报告

A Summary Report of FSCJ Workshop "Future Challenges and Opportunities in Developing Methodologies for Improved Human Risk Assessments".

作者信息

Tachibana Kaoruko, Kass George E N, Ono Atsushi, Yamada Takashi, Tong Weida, Doerge Daniel R, Yamazoe Yasushi

机构信息

Department of Environmental Medicine, Kochi Medical School, Kohasu, Oko-cho, Nankoku-shi, Kochi 
783-8505, Japan.

Food Safety Commission of Japan, Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, Akasaka Park Bldg, 22F, 5-2-20 Akasaka, Minatoku, Tokyo 107-6122, Japan.

出版信息

Food Saf (Tokyo). 2019 Nov 22;7(4):83-89. doi: 10.14252/foodsafetyfscj.2018017. eCollection 2019 Dec.

DOI:10.14252/foodsafetyfscj.2018017
PMID:31998592
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6957455/
Abstract

This is a summary report of FSCJ (Food Safety Commission of Japan) workshop entitled "Future Challenges and Opportunities in Developing Methodologies for Improved Human Risk Assessments, which held in November 2018. Scientific advancements have facilitated the development of new methods for chemical risk assessments with the expansion of toxicological databases. They are promising tools to overcome challenges, such as situations of data insufficiency, estimation of internal exposure and prediction of hazard, and enable us to improve our human health risk assessment in food safety. In this review, current understandings on developments in chemical risk assessments, especially focusing on Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) approach, non-testing and approaches (e.g. read-across), and physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) modeling are discussed as possible promising tools. It also discusses future challenges and opportunities regarding social environment buildings in which all stakeholders including scientific experts, risk managers and consumers are able to accept these new risk assessment technologies. International collaboration would increase and enhance the efficiency in forming innovative ideas and in translating them into regulatory practices. It would strengthen technical capacity of experts who contribute to regulatory decisions and also promote acceptance of new methodologies among stakeholders. Cross-sectional collaboration such as making good use of human data of pharmaceutical drugs will facilitate a development of fresh tools for food safety domains. Once a new methodology is recognized in risk assessment agencies as implementable, it needs to be acknowledged and accepted by wider range of different stakeholders. Such stakeholders include scientific experts who conduct risk assessment for the risk assessment agencies, food industries and consumers. Transparency in the risk assessment work performed by regulatory agencies should strengthen their credibility and promote the acceptance of risk assessment including the new methodologies used in it. At the same time, efforts should be continued by regulatory agencies to further communicate with consumers about the concept of risk-based assessment as well as the concept of uncertainty.

摘要

这是日本食品安全委员会(FSCJ)于2018年11月举办的题为“改进人类风险评估方法的未来挑战与机遇”研讨会的总结报告。随着毒理学数据库的扩展,科学进步推动了化学风险评估新方法的发展。它们是应对数据不足、内暴露估计和危害预测等挑战的有前景的工具,使我们能够改进食品安全领域的人类健康风险评估。在本综述中,将讨论化学风险评估发展方面的当前认识,特别是关注毒理学关注阈值(TTC)方法、非测试方法(如类推法)和基于生理的药代动力学(PBPK)建模等可能有前景的工具。还将讨论社会环境建设方面的未来挑战与机遇,在这样的环境中,包括科学专家、风险管理者和消费者在内的所有利益相关者都能够接受这些新的风险评估技术。国际合作将增加并提高形成创新想法并将其转化为监管实践的效率。这将加强为监管决策做出贡献的专家的技术能力,并促进利益相关者对新方法的接受。跨领域合作,如充分利用药品的人体数据,将有助于开发食品安全领域的新工具。一旦一种新方法在风险评估机构中被认为可实施,就需要得到更广泛不同利益相关者的认可和接受。这些利益相关者包括为风险评估机构进行风险评估的科学专家、食品行业和消费者。监管机构进行的风险评估工作的透明度应增强其可信度,并促进包括其中使用的新方法在内的风险评估的接受。与此同时,监管机构应继续努力,就基于风险的评估概念以及不确定性概念与消费者进行进一步沟通。

相似文献

1
A Summary Report of FSCJ Workshop "Future Challenges and Opportunities in Developing Methodologies for Improved Human Risk Assessments".佛罗里达州南区学院杰克逊维尔分校研讨会“改进人类风险评估方法开发中的未来挑战与机遇”总结报告
Food Saf (Tokyo). 2019 Nov 22;7(4):83-89. doi: 10.14252/foodsafetyfscj.2018017. eCollection 2019 Dec.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
EFSA's OpenFoodTox: An open source toxicological database on chemicals in food and feed and its future developments.EFSA 的 OpenFoodTox:一个关于食品和饲料中化学物质的开源毒理学数据库及其未来发展。
Environ Int. 2021 Jan;146:106293. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106293. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Challenges in working towards an internal threshold of toxicological concern (iTTC) for use in the safety assessment of cosmetics: Discussions from the Cosmetics Europe iTTC Working Group workshop.在化妆品安全评估中使用毒理学关注阈值(iTTC)的内部阈值方面面临的挑战:来自欧洲化妆品协会 iTTC 工作组研讨会的讨论。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Apr;103:63-72. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.01.016. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
6
Regulatory forum opinion piece*: supporting the need for international harmonization of safety assessments for food flavoring substances.监管论坛观点文章*:支持食品调味剂安全性评估国际协调的必要性。
Toxicol Pathol. 2014 Aug;42(6):949-53. doi: 10.1177/0192623313495603. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
7
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
8
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
9
Next generation testing strategy for assessment of genomic damage: A conceptual framework and considerations.用于评估基因组损伤的下一代检测策略:一个概念框架及考量因素
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2017 Jun;58(5):264-283. doi: 10.1002/em.22045. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
10
On the Commemorative Ceremony and Symposium for the 20 Anniversary of Food Safety Commission, Cabinet Office, Government of Japan.在日本内阁府食品安全委员会成立20周年纪念仪式暨研讨会上。
Food Saf (Tokyo). 2024 Mar 22;12(1):18-24. doi: 10.14252/foodsafetyfscj.D-24-00005. eCollection 2024 Mar.

引用本文的文献

1
Subject fields in Food Safety during 10 years.十年间食品安全领域的主题
Food Saf (Tokyo). 2021 Jun 25;9(2):25-31. doi: 10.14252/foodsafetyfscj.D-21-00007. eCollection 2021 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the applicability of existing (Q)SAR models for predicting the genotoxicity of pesticides and similarity analysis related with genotoxicity of pesticides for facilitating of grouping and read across: An EFSA funded project.评估现有(定量)构效关系(QSAR)模型在预测农药遗传毒性方面的适用性,以及与农药遗传毒性相关的相似性分析,以促进分组和类推:一项由欧洲食品安全局资助的项目。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020 Jul;114:104658. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104658. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
2
Development of Decision Forest Models for Prediction of Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Humans Using A Large Set of FDA-approved Drugs.利用大型 FDA 批准药物集开发用于预测人类药物性肝损伤的决策森林模型。
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 11;7(1):17311. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17701-7.
3
Predicting drug-induced liver injury: The importance of data curation.预测药物性肝损伤:数据整理的重要性。
Toxicology. 2017 Aug 15;389:139-145. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
4
Carcinogenicity of glycidamide in B6C3F1 mice and F344/N rats from a two-year drinking water exposure.通过两年饮水暴露研究甘氨酰胺对B6C3F1小鼠和F344/N大鼠的致癌性。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2015 Dec;86:104-15. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2015.09.017. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
5
The liver toxicity knowledge base: a systems approach to a complex end point.肝脏毒性知识库:一种系统方法应对复杂终点
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013 May;93(5):409-12. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2013.16. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
6
High lipophilicity and high daily dose of oral medications are associated with significant risk for drug-induced liver injury.高亲脂性和高每日口服药物剂量与药物性肝损伤的显著风险相关。
Hepatology. 2013 Jul;58(1):388-96. doi: 10.1002/hep.26208. Epub 2013 May 27.
7
Evaluation of the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC)--challenges and approaches.毒理学关注阈值(TTC)评估——挑战与方法。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2013 Feb;65(1):168-77. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.03.007. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
8
Tumorigenicity of acrylamide and its metabolite glycidamide in the neonatal mouse bioassay.丙烯酰胺及其代谢物丙烯醛在新生小鼠生物测定中的致癌性。
Int J Cancer. 2012 Nov 1;131(9):2008-15. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27493. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
9
Improvement of the Cramer classification for oral exposure using the database TTC RepDose--a strategy description.利用 TTC RepDose 数据库改进口腔暴露的 Cramer 分类——策略描述。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011 Dec;61(3):340-50. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.09.005. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
10
Threshold of toxicological concern values for non-genotoxic effects in industrial chemicals: re-evaluation of the Cramer classification.毒理学关注阈值值用于工业化学品的非遗传毒性效应:克拉默分类的再评价。
Arch Toxicol. 2012 Jan;86(1):17-25. doi: 10.1007/s00204-011-0732-z. Epub 2011 Jul 7.