Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Chang Zheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, China.
Am J Surg. 2011 Jul;202(1):82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.10.016.
The LigaSure vessel sealing system (Valleylab, Boulder, CO) has been tested, with excellent results, in different fields of surgery. However, no study has evaluated the efficiency of the LigaSure in open esophagogastric decongestion and splenectomy in a randomized trial to date.
Patients scheduled to undergo esophagogastric decongestion and splenectomy were assigned to the use of either the LigaSure or a conventional clamp-and-tie technique. Primary outcome measures were operating time and intraoperative blood loss. Secondary outcome measures were postoperative drainage volume, complications such as spleen fever, bleeding, portal vein thrombosis, length of incision, pain, and time to discharge.
Sixty patients were randomized to the LigaSure (n = 30) and clamp-and-tie (n = 30) groups. The groups were well matched with respect to liver function, associated illnesses, and grading of esophageal varices. Postoperative outcomes in drainage and major complications did not differ between the groups, while operative time and the volume of blood loss were significantly decreased in the LigaSure group compared with the clamp-and-tie group (P < .001).
The use of the LigaSure is safe and effective in vessel division and homeostasis in the esophagogastric decongestion and splenectomy, with statistically significant decreases in operative time and intraoperative blood loss and without significantly modifying postoperative results.
LigaSure 血管密封系统(瓦力拉,博尔德,CO)已在不同的外科领域进行了测试,结果非常出色。然而,迄今为止,尚无研究评估 LigaSure 在开放性食管胃去充血和脾切除术中的效率。
计划进行食管胃去充血和脾切除术的患者被分配使用 LigaSure 或传统的夹钳技术。主要观察指标为手术时间和术中出血量。次要观察指标为术后引流量、脾热、出血、门静脉血栓形成、切口长度、疼痛以及出院时间等并发症。
60 例患者随机分为 LigaSure 组(n = 30)和夹钳组(n = 30)。两组在肝功能、合并症和食管静脉曲张分级方面具有良好的可比性。引流和主要并发症的术后结果两组间无差异,而 LigaSure 组的手术时间和出血量明显低于夹钳组(P <.001)。
LigaSure 在食管胃去充血和脾切除术中用于血管分离和止血是安全有效的,可显著减少手术时间和术中出血量,而不会显著改变术后结果。