Birmingham City University, School of Property Construction and Planning, City North Campus, England B42 2SU, United Kingdom.
J Environ Manage. 2011 Oct;92(10):2754-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.017. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
Academics and policy makers seeking to deconstruct landscape face major challenges conceptually, methodologically and institutionally. The meaning(s), identity(ies) and management of landscape are controversial and contested. The European Landscape Convention provides an opportunity for action and change set within new governance agendas addressing interdisciplinarity and spatial planning. This paper critically reviews the complex web of conceptual and methodological frameworks that characterise landscape planning and management and then focuses on emerging landscape governance in Scotland within a mixed method approach involving policy analyses, semi-structured interviews and best practice case studies. Using Dower's (2008) criteria from the Articles of the European Landscape Convention, the results show that whilst some progress has been made in landscape policy and practice, largely through the actions of key individuals and champions, there are significant institutional hurdles and resource limitations to overcome. The need to mainstream positive landscape outcomes requires a significant culture change where a one-size-fits-all approach does not work.
学者和政策制定者在试图解构景观时，在概念、方法和制度层面都面临着重大挑战。景观的意义、身份和管理具有争议性和争议性。《欧洲景观公约》为行动和变革提供了机会，这些行动和变革是在解决跨学科性和空间规划的新治理议程的框架内提出的。本文批判性地回顾了景观规划和管理的复杂概念和方法框架网络，然后重点关注苏格兰新兴的景观治理，采用了涉及政策分析、半结构化访谈和最佳实践案例研究的混合方法。使用《欧洲景观公约》第 8 条的多威标准，结果表明，尽管在景观政策和实践方面取得了一些进展，主要是通过关键个人和拥护者的行动，但在机构障碍和资源限制方面仍有很大的改进空间。将积极的景观成果纳入主流需要进行重大的文化变革，因为一刀切的方法行不通。
