Suppr超能文献

将生物学和认知老化联系起来:努力改善发展时间的特征描述。

Linking biological and cognitive aging: toward improving characterizations of developmental time.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada.

出版信息

J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2011 Jul;66 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i59-70. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbr039.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Chronological age is the most frequently employed predictor in life-span developmental research, despite repeated assertions that it is best conceived as a proxy for true mechanistic changes that influence cognition across time. The present investigation explores the potential that selected functional biomarkers may contribute to the more effective conceptual and operational definitions of developmental time.

METHODS

We used data from the Victoria Longitudinal Study to explore both static and dynamic biological or physiological markers that arguably influence process-specific mechanisms underlying cognitive changes in late life. Multilevel models were fit to test the dynamic coupling between change in theoretically relevant biomarkers (e.g., grip strength, pulmonary function) and change in select cognitive measures (e.g., executive function, episodic and semantic memory).

RESULTS

Results showed that, independent of the passage of developmental time (indexed as years in study), significant time-varying covariation was observed linking corresponding declines for select cognitive outcomes and biological markers.

DISCUSSION

Our findings support the interpretation that cognitive decline is not due to chronological aging per se but rather reflects multiple causal factors from a broad range of biological and physical health domains that operate along the age continuum.

摘要

目的

尽管反复声称,最好将年龄视为影响随时间变化的认知的真正机制变化的代理,但在寿命发展研究中,最常使用的预测因子仍是实际年龄。本研究探讨了选择的功能性生物标志物可能对发展时间的更有效概念和操作定义做出贡献的潜力。

方法

我们使用来自维多利亚纵向研究的数据,探讨了可能影响晚年认知变化背后的特定过程机制的静态和动态生物或生理标志物。拟合多层次模型以测试理论上相关生物标志物(例如握力、肺功能)变化与特定认知测量(例如执行功能、情节和语义记忆)变化之间的动态耦合。

结果

结果表明,独立于发展时间(以研究中的年数为指标)的流逝,观察到与特定认知结果和生物标志物的相应下降相关的显著时变协变。

讨论

我们的研究结果支持这样的解释,即认知能力下降不是由于实际年龄本身,而是反映了沿着年龄连续体运作的广泛的生物和身体健康领域的多个因果因素。

相似文献

3
Tracking cognition-health changes from 55 to 95 years of age.从 55 岁到 95 岁跟踪认知-健康变化。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2011 Jul;66 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i153-61. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbq093. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
7
Grip Strength and Cognitive Abilities: Associations in Old Age.握力与认知能力:老年人群中的关联
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2016 Sep;71(5):841-8. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbv017. Epub 2015 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

4
Association between grip strength and cognitive impairment in older American adults.美国老年人握力与认知障碍之间的关联。
Front Mol Neurosci. 2022 Nov 30;15:973700. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2022.973700. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

6
Human genetic variations: Beacons on the pathways to successful ageing.人类基因变异:通往成功衰老之路的灯塔。
Mech Ageing Dev. 2009 Sep;130(9):553-63. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2009.06.009. Epub 2009 Jul 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验