Departamento de Anestesiología, Facultad de Medicina, Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.
Br J Anaesth. 2011 Oct;107(4):593-600. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer198. Epub 2011 Jul 9.
The performance of eight currently available paediatric propofol pharmacokinetic models in target-controlled infusions (TCIs) was assessed, in healthy children from 3 to 26 months of age.
Forty-one, ASA I-II children, aged 3-26 months were studied. After the induction of general anaesthesia with sevoflurane and remifentanil, a propofol bolus dose of 2.5 mg kg(-1) followed by an infusion of 8 mg kg(-1) h(-1) was given. Arterial blood samples were collected at 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 20, 40, and 60 min post-bolus, at the end of surgery, and at 1, 3, 5, 30, 60, and 120 min after stopping the infusion. Model performance was visually inspected with measured/predicted plots. Median performance error (MDPE) and the median absolute performance error (MDAPE) were calculated to measure bias and accuracy of each model.
Performance of the eight models tested differed markedly during the different stages of propofol administration. Most models underestimated propofol concentration 1 min after the bolus dose, suggesting an overestimation of the initial volume of distribution. Six of the eight models tested were within the accepted limits of performance (MDPE<20% and MDAPE<30%). The model derived by Short and colleagues performed best.
Our results suggest that six of the eight models tested perform well in young children. Since most models overestimate the initial volume of distribution, the use for TCI might result in the administration of larger bolus doses than necessary.
评估了 8 种现有的儿科丙泊酚药代动力学模型在小儿靶控输注(TCI)中的表现,研究对象为 3 至 26 个月龄的健康儿童。
研究纳入 41 例 ASA I-II 级的 3-26 月龄儿童。在七氟醚和瑞芬太尼诱导全身麻醉后,给予 2.5mg/kg 的丙泊酚负荷剂量,然后以 8mg/kg/h 的速度输注。在推注后 1、2、3、5、10、20、40 和 60 分钟,手术结束时,以及停止输注后 1、3、5、30、60 和 120 分钟时采集动脉血样。通过实测/预测图对模型表现进行直观检查。计算中位数性能误差(MDPE)和中位数绝对性能误差(MDAPE)以衡量每个模型的偏差和准确性。
在丙泊酚给药的不同阶段,所测试的 8 种模型的性能差异显著。大多数模型在推注后 1 分钟低估丙泊酚浓度,提示初始分布容积估计过高。所测试的 8 种模型中有 6 种符合性能接受标准(MDPE<20%和 MDAPE<30%)。由 Short 等人推导的模型表现最佳。
我们的结果表明,在所测试的 8 种模型中有 6 种在幼儿中表现良好。由于大多数模型高估了初始分布容积,因此 TCI 的应用可能导致给予比必要更大的负荷剂量。